project - Research and innovation

BEST PRACTICES AND INNOVATIONS FOR A SUSTAINABLE BEEKEEPING

Project identifier: 2022HE_101059812_B-THENET
Ongoing | 2022 - 2026 Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden
Ongoing | 2022 - 2026 Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden

Kontext

EU beekeepers produce 200 000 tonnes of honey each year. However, this is not enough to cover demand in the EU market. Advances in digitalisation and innovation can help promote beekeeping. In this context, the EU-funded B-THENET project will implement a multi-actor approach to make the EU beekeeping sector more economically viable and sustainable. The approach will involve the entire sustainable agriculture sector in collecting, categorising and helping select best practices and applicable research findings, using a bottom-up methodology. For instance, practices that meet beekeepers’ needs will be selected, shared and customised in a public platform and 13 national sub-networks. The project will consider territorial differences and adapt tailored and validated practices. B-THENET will map out the channels most consulted by beekeepers in a platform available in 15 EU languages.

Objectives

The B-THENET Thematic Network implements a multi actor (MA) approach to modernize the EU beekeeping sector, sharing knowledge that is ready to be put into practice, while fostering innovation and digitalization. Beekeepers will be advanced toward more economically viable and sustainable beekeeping through the knowledge sharing and training of useful and applicable best practices. Our MA approach engages the entire apiculture sector (beekeepers, advisors, researchers, policymakers, industry, consumers, etc.) to collect, categorize and help select best practices and applicable research findings not sufficiently known, using a bottom-up methodology that populates two accessible platforms (“Practices” and “R&I”). Only practices that meet beekeepers’ needs, are effective and ready to use, will be selected, shared and customized in our public platform (“Exchange”) and in national sub-networks (13 National Centres), so we can take into account the differences between territories, and adapt practices to specific regions, languages, equipment, bee genetics, diseases, and the operational scale of beekeeping. This approach will support the setting-up of tailored and validated best practices.
A sociological study will map out the channels most consulted by beekeepers to maximise the dissemination of practices in a specific, long-term platform (“Repository”), which is set up to share best practices in appealing, easy to understand, audio-visual materials, translated into 15 EU languages.
The flow of practical information will be supported by the 13 National Centres, 3 International Centres and by the targeted events (312 national and 6 international), 1 EU manual on best practices, and 1 set of guidelines for advisors in beekeeping, thus contributing to a rapid cross-fertilization process and to a greater acceptance of the final outputs.

Activities

Work package WP1 – TN Coordination and Management:

Ensure appropriate and effective coordination as well as a technical, administrative, and financial procedures for efficient operational management. Coordinate the timely allocation of resources and implementation of procedures to assure proper fulfilment of the Grant Agreement. Establish and apply protocols and measures to manage the risks, monitor and verify the achievement of goals. Develop a Data Management Plan and Ethics and implement a successful AKIS/MAA approach.

Work package WP2 – Collection and Evaluation of Practices:

Build a community on the platforms and identify priority practices and innovations ready to practice with a bottom-up approach. Map all available EU research project results that could provide useful practices and innovations to the TN. Categorize and define a strategy for the analyses of practices and apply a funnelling approach to apply a cost-benefit analysis, the readiness to practice, the sustainability and the scientific criteria. Publish the analysed practices in the Exchange platform.

Work package WP3 – Validation of Practices:

Define and apply the strategy for the validation of practices. Validate practices with the contribution of the activated National B-THENET Centres Identify and standardize the Best Beekeeping Practice concept and compile practice abstracts (EIP-AGRI format) on identified Best Beekeeping Practices Translate Best Beekeeping Practices outputs (defined by the sociological studies) into 15 languages.

Work package WP4 – Dissemination, Communication and Exploitation:

WP4 aims at establishing the TN’s identity and visibility in Europe. It will develop the necessary support to the promotion of TN outcomes and will sustain the expected achievements of the TN. It structures all dissemination, communication and exploitation processes, both within the TN and most importantly, towards the target groups. In particular, it will contribute to set up clustered activities with EIP-AGRI and other sectorial projects; to set up the four platforms and three International B-THENET centers and to maximize the social impact of the research and the activities carried out.

 

Project details
Main funding source
Horizon Europe (EU Research and Innovation Programme)
Type of Horizon project
Multi-actor project - Thematic network
Project acronym
B-THENET
CORDIS Fact sheet
Project contribution to CAP specific objectives
  • Ensuring a fair income for farmers
  • Increasing competitiveness
  • Improving the position of farmers in the food chain
  • Supporting generational renewal
  • Vibrant rural areas
  • Protecting food and health quality
  • Fostering knowledge and innovation
Project contribution to EU Strategies
  • Reducing the use of antimicrobials for farmed animals and in aquaculture
  • Protecting and/or restoring of biodiversity and ecosystem services within agrarian and forest systems

EUR 3 271 891.00

Total budget

Total contributions including EU funding.

EUR 3 271 891.00

EU contribution

Any type of EU funding.

22 Practice Abstracts

Heat treatment of the brood combs to control Varroa mites requires an expensive instrument and time.

The heat treatment method is not widely used and sufficient scientific studies are still lacking. However, various devices are already available on the market. Some heat treatments for Varroa control are carried out on the whole colony, while other systems treat individual brood combs.

The method is based on the different thermotolerance of honey bees and Varroa mites. The operculated brood can tolerate short-term heatings up to 44 °C, while the Varroa mite cannot tolerate temperature above 40 °C. There are two different options for heat treatment: either the brood combs can be removed and exposed to heat treatment, or sensors can be attached to the inside of the hives to treat individual colonies. In both cases, the temperature should be close to 44 °C and kept for a few hours to ensure that it warms up the Varroa mites possibly present in the brood cells over their thermotolerance limit. The possible negative effects on bees (e.g. life-span), have not yet been sufficiently investigated.

Warnings: May depend on the regulations in force in the given country.

Please check out the B-THENET Platform for the Best Beekeeping Practices tailored to each country, co-developed with practicing beekeepers in the National B-THENET Centres of those countries (Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden). 

Queen caging is used to ensure an artificial brood block, both in summer and winter (when necessary).

Numerous queen caging devices are available on the market. The cant differ in size, materials used and relative cost. All such devices are equipped with a queen excluder net that prevents the queen from passing through, but ensures that the worker bees can take care of her.

On average, caging the queen takes longer than treating her with acaricides alone. There are cages made of different materials (e.g. bamboo or plastic) and with different space within the grid.

The two basic types of caging:

  1. Caging separately from the frames (it does not allow ovideposition)
  2. Caging on the frame (it allows ovideposition)

The duration of caging can be variable. The treatments (e.g. oxalic acid treatments) are carried out when all brood has either been removed and there is no receptive brood (in case of using cages that prevent the queen from oviposition) or all brood is removed but there is still receptive brood (in the case of using cages that allow the queen to oviposit).

Isolation with vertical queen excluders can also be mentioned, but the remaining brood must be removed.

Even in case of single-honeycomb caging, the single honeycomb also must be disposed due to the possibly high Varroa mite infestation level. In case of confinement on several combs, new nuclei can be established instead.

As an alternative to the honeycomb cage, a super frame can be used on which the queen excluder is mounted on both sides. The wax sheet can be left unbuilt, but it would be better to remove it completely to allow the bees to pass through and to ensure greater diffusion of the queen's pheromone.

With respect to the positioning of the cage on the frame in summer/winter, the geolocation is also important to be considered (e.g. in summer at high altitudes it might be better to place the cage higher up).

The queen can also be confined for a shorter period of time, restarting the egg-laying activity a few days earlier, allowing a faster recovery for the hive and less stress for the queen. The Varroa mite, in fact, enters the brood cells just before their closing, i.e. on day 9 after oviposition. Therefore, it is possible to release the queen 7 days earlier than the theoretical 24 days, i.e. on day 17. In fact, even assuming that as soon as the queen is released, it begins to lay eggs, the larvae will only be receptive for Varroa mite infestation after 8-9 days, however, in the meantime all the operculated cells present will be hatched. In this way, we can shorten the queen caging period by a week, allowing oviposition to resume earlier, resulting in a faster recovery of the hive. Even if the queen is freed on day 17, anti-varroa treatment must be carried out on day 21 or (in case drone brood is present) on day 24 from the onset of queen caging.

In case of winter caging, the cage containing the queen should remain inside the glomere at all times. In winter, the caging period can be even longer than 24 days and the queen can be released when environmental conditions are favourable for the development of the colony. One strategy for caging the queen during winter is to place the cage above the frames so that the bees can take care of the queen and keep her at a suitable temperature more easily (the heat developed by the hive is streaming upwards).

Conversely, in case of summer caging, the cage containing the queen should be placed on the lower part of the frame, preferably near the hive entrance to ensure optimal ventilation.

Caging on honeycombs can also be performed by placing the frame inside the hive cover.

As observed by beekeepers, the re-acceptance of queens on honeycomb, in summer is higher than that of caged queens. In some cases, honeycomb mortality is lower than cage mortality. Based on field experience, queens that die in cages are assumed to have a priori problems (e.g. low fertility, low pheromone production).

A new alternative to queen caging for brood blocking is the ringing of queens. This technique involves the use of plastic or silicone rings that are placed around the queen's abdomen. These rings prevent the queen from oviposition.

Warnings: May depend on the regulations in force in the given country.

Please check out the B-THENET Platform for the Best Beekeeping Practices tailored to each country, co-developed with practicing beekeepers in the National B-THENET Centres of those countries (Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden). 

Brood removal is a beekeeping technique to remove the brood present to increase the effectiveness of acaricide treatments (e.g. oxalic acid) in the foretic phase.

Tools and materials needed:

  • Possibly a knife or fork,
  • Containers for storing removed frames or honeycomb parts, and a
  • Gas torch to disinfect the knife or fork.

Depending on the quantity of brood and time of the year, the brood can be removed either by removing the entire frames (when there is a lot of brood present, e.g. in spring or summer, taking care not to remove the queen) or by straining/cutting off the brood present (e.g. in autumn-winter).

The removed brood may be destroyed, or, in the case of whole frame removal, used to make artificial nuclei (if te weather conditions are favorable). In the latter case, the brood frames can be removed with or without the bees on them. The brood frames covered with bees must be treated with drugs against the Varroa mites that can be also used in the presence  of brood (formic acid) and/or by letting the brood hatch. It is important not to leave the nuclei in the same apiary to avoid the re-infestation due to drifting.

If a knife or fork is used to remove brood, the tools should be disinfected with gas flame each time a new hive is handled to reduce the risk the transmission of pathogens.

If brood removal is carried out by straining in the autumn period, other health issues might also arise, such as e.g. calcified brood (probably due to the increase of humidity in the nest as a result of the breaking of larval forms and/or the reduction of the number of adult bees that are known to be indispensable for the proper maintenance of temperature in the nest).

It is important to specify that 'straining' and 'knife removal' of brood are two techniques that should only be adopted in the presence of small portions of brood to avoid excessively altering the structure of the nest.

Warnings: May depend on the regulations in force in the given country.

Please check out the B-THENET Platform for the Best Beekeeping Practices tailored to each country, co-developed with practicing beekeepers in the National B-THENET Centres of those countries (Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden). 

The active ingredients that are considered to have a low environmental impact (e.g. thymol, menthol, camphor etc.) might vary among the countries.

Only veterinary medicinal products authorized in the given country should be applied.

Warnings: May depend on the regulations in force in the given country.

Please check out the B-THENET Platform for the Best Beekeeping Practices tailored to each country, co-developed with practicing beekeepers in the National B-THENET Centres of those countries (Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden). 

Thymol is an active ingredient that is able to kill Varroa mites only outside the brood cells.

However, thymol-based veterinary medicinal products can also be used in the presence of brood, administering them at the times indicated in the package leaflets. Thymol is a natural active ingredient and permitted in organic beekeeping (please also check out the relevant national legislation).

Thymol spreads by evaporation and the rate of evaporation is influenced by the temperature outside the hive. In case of high ambiental temperature, the evaporation rate might be too fast, which can cause even serious damage to hives (absconding). If such temperature is too low, the evaporation speed may be too low thus hindering the efficacy of the treatment.

The instructions given in the information leaflet of the veterinary medicinal product must be followed carefully.

Thymol-based veterinary medical products are generally not suitable for winter treatment.

Since thymol acts by evaporation, it is more effective in densely populated hives having good ventilation and thus better diffusion of the active ingredient within the hive. Therefore, during the treatment with thymol, the mesh bottom of the hives as well as any gaps (e.g. the space between the coverlet and the nest) must be closed to prevent dispersion of the active ingredient, which could reduce the efficacy of the treatment.

To allow the bees to get used to the thymol treatment, it can be started the evening before by applyng a reduced dosage.

Warnings: May depend on the regulations in force in the given country.

Please check out the B-THENET Platform for the Best Beekeeping Practices tailored to each country, co-developed with practicing beekeepers in the National B-THENET Centres of those countries (Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden). 

Formic acid is an active ingredient that can kill Varroa mites even within the brood.

Evaporation of formic acid is influenced by temperature. High temperatures may lead to an evaporation rate that is too fast, which may cause damage, even serious, to the hives (absconding, death of adult bees, brood, orphan colonies). Conversely, in case of low ambient temperature, the evaporation speed may be too low which can drastically reduce the effectiveness of the treatment.

The indications given in the information leaflet of the veterinary medicinal product applied must be followed carefully.

The colony strength can determine the success (or failure) of the treatment: in densely populated hives with good ventilation the diffusion of the active ingredient inside the hive is better.

Since formic acid is spread by evaporation, it is necessary to close the mesh bottom of the hives to prevent the dispersion of the active ingredient, which could reduce the effecicay of the treatment. However, removing the flight hatch to facilitate ventilation by the bees in case of high temperature might be advisable.

Some formic acid drugs require specific devices for administration.

Warnings: May depend on the regulations in force in the given country.

Please check out the B-THENET Platform for the Best Beekeeping Practices tailored to each country, co-developed with practicing beekeepers in the National B-THENET Centres of those countries (Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden). 

Oxalic acid is an active ingredient that can only kill Varroa mites present outside the operculated cells. Therefore, the anti-varroa treatments carried out with products containing oxalic acid as active ingredient must be applied in the complete absence of operculated brood.

The factors to be considered in casse of oxalic acid treatments:

  • Registered veterinary medicinal products
  • Liquid drug administration devices (syringes, drippers)
  • Devices for administering drugs by sublimation (sublimators)
  • Personal Protective Equipment (PPE): gloves, white overalls, gas mask with acid and dust filters
  • Devices for caging the queen

Oxalic acid treatment should be administered in the absence of brood to ensure optimal treatment efficacy.
The complete absence of brood can be achieved under natural or artificial conditions.

The complete absence of brood can occur:

  • in winter due to cold weather as well as in summer (in some particularly hot areas, if there is any in the given country),
  • as soon as a natural swarm is collected,
  • by carrying out brood removal,
  • when caging the queen or confining her.

Oxalic acid treatment is authorised in organic beekeeping (please check out also the national regulations). In conventional beekeeping, it is important to remember to rotate the active ingredients used for treating the bees to avoid the development of drug resistance (although no resistance to oxalic acid is currently detected). Liquid oxalic acid should be administered in the form of a sugar solution.

Oxalic acid treatment can be applied by dripping the drug in liquid form (or in glycerol) or by sublimation of the drug using various types of commercially available sublimators. In all cases, the instructions on the drug package leaflets must be follow followed carefully and Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) must be used.

When using drip medication, it can be dispensed with a clean syringe, by dripping slowly onto the bees when most of the bees are in the nest (e.g. early morning or late evening) so that as many bees as possible can come into contact with the medication. If the drug is administered in winter, warming up the solution might be advantegous.

Albeit the sublimation method for the administration of oxalic acid drugs is a very common practice, it has several disadvantages:

  • the need to wear appropriate PPE (full overalls, full-face mask with organic acid and dust filter, e.g. A2 P3),
  • the aftermath of treatments (e.g. the risk of inhaling oxalic acid crystals that persist inside the nest),
  • the need to purchase the sublimator,
  • difficulty in dispensing the drug and ensuring the all the bees could come into contact with the medicament (depending on where the sublimator is inserted).

In terms of advantages, the sublimation of oxalic acid guarantees greater homogeneity of treatment, reduced time for simultaneous administration and allows the operation to be carried out without tne necessity of opening the hives.

The sublimation should be started from the top of the hive, as the vapour generated are heavier than the air and it spreads by gravity more evenly inside the hive (and tend to precipitate downwards). It may be useful to rotate the cover to administer the sublimation treatment from above, to create a sublimation chamber and to optimise the distribution of the product inside the hive. The sublimation should be carried out when most of the bees are present in the hive (early morning or late evening). Sublimation should not be carried out at a too low temperature as the treatment would not be effective with bees clustering within the hives (forming the so-called glomeres).

Warnings: May depend on the regulations in force in the given country.

Please check out the B-THENET Platform for the Best Beekeeping Practices tailored to each country, co-developed with practicing beekeepers in the National B-THENET Centres of those countries (Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden). 

Anti-varroa treatments are necessary to ensure the survival of hives, their health, and productivity.

For the selection of the best time period for anti-varroa treatments the following aspects must be considered:

  • the purpose of beekeeping (honey production, pollination, etc.),
  • production flow phase (e.g. nectariferous),
  • farm strategies (nomadism, nucleus formation time, etc.),
  • the phyto-climatic belts where bees are kept,
  • the density of bees in the area.

In general, two periods that are favourable for anti-varroa treatments can be indicated in temperate and sub-tropical zones:

  1. one in summer, when the nectar flow is low due to heat (or drought);
  2. one in winter, when the amount of brood laying is minimal or completely absent due to the cold weather.

If there are hives in the apiary with a high level of Varroa infestation, it is possible to suspend production and carry out Varroa treatment also at other times of the year.

It is advisable to treat natural swarms as soon as they are harvested (after the swarm has settled and still has no brood), as they are not in production and completely devoid of brood, thus guaranteeing an immediate reduction of the level of Varroa infestation.

In the different countries, depending on the phyto-climatic zones in which bees are kept, the precise moments to check for the absence of brood and to apply different treatments (always bearing in mind the importance of alternating them to avoid resistance to the active ingredients) can be identified.

In general:

  • In mountain areas: check absence of brood in winter due to the harsher climate (consider that evaporating treatments with thymol-based drugs - if they are authozrized in the given country - may be ineffective at low temperatures).
  • In hilly areas: check for absence of brood in winter.
  • In coastal areas: check for absence of brood in winter and summer (note that evaporating treatments with thymol-based medicines - if they are authorized in the given country - may be dangerous for bees at high temperatures).

Warnings: May depend on the regulations in force in the given country.

Please check out the B-THENET Platform for the Best Beekeeping Practices tailored to each country, co-developed with practicing beekeepers in the National B-THENET Centres of those countries (Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden). 

Knowing the level of Varroa infestation is fundamental for all beekeepers, both hobbyists and professionals, as Varroa mite is still the main cause of mortality of bees all over the world.

The main possible components of assessing the Varroa mite infestation level:

  • Powdered sugar testing equipment
  • Equipment for washing in alcohol
  • Hives with mesh bottom and adhesive sheets

The life cycle of Varroa mites includes a dispersive phase on adult bees and a reproductive phase inside the brood cells. The quantity of adult bees and brood at different times of the year, therefore, are two basic data for choosing the method to use for monitoring the level of Varroa infestation. However, not all methods are identical from both a practical and informative point of view. Some methods, in fact, must be applied for 10 consecutive days before obtaining a reliable result; while others can be applied only once every 2-4 weeks and immediately provide the infestation value. The infestation value obtained can only partially reflect the real infestation rate of the hives, therefore, based on the time of year, the method that suits the best should be chosen for the given apiary based on:

  • the development phase of the colonies,
  • the experience of the beekeeper,
  • the time available,
  • the business needs of the apiary, and
  • previously used methods (if available).

Available methods:

NATURAL FALL:

Monitoring the natural fall is easy to implement, it does not disturb the colony but requires time for its appropriate application. On day 1, a mesh bottom to allow the passage of the mites and avoid the destruction of the sheets by the bees should be placed under each hive selected for the monitoring. In the diagnostic hive, place an adhesive sheet or a panel covered with an oily substance (e.g. used oil) arranged with the adhesive part facing upwards. The use of adhesive sheets is more practical as it allows for easy removal and closing, and counting even far away from the hives. After 10 days, count the number of mites present on the adhesive sheet/panel covered with Vaseline and divide this number by 10. In this way, the Varroa mite infestation level will be gained as the number of mites/day. To prevent ants or other insects from removing the mites that have fallen onto the adhesive bottom, some strategies must be adopted such as: immersing the feet of the hive supports in basins filled up with water (which can also act as drinking source for the bees) or glue around the legs of the hive supports. Different types of mites will be found on the adhesive sheets or panels treated with Vaseline: both dark and light. To correctly evaluate the natural fall, only mites having a dark brown/reddish color must be counted as they are the adult ones ready to repeat the reproductive cycle.

VARROA IN DISPERSIVE PHASE

The icing sugar method, like the alcohol washing method, has the purpose of counting the number of Varroa mites present in the dispersive phase from bee sample.

TO SAMPLE BEES FOR ICING SUGAR OR WASHING IN ALCOHOL

For both methods, a sample of 350-450 bees needs to be collected. To standardize the amount, a standard 110-120 milliliter urine sampling jar could be used. Alternatively, another type of jar can also be used with the support of a scale to quantify the number of bees sampled (it is important to know the weight of a bee). The sample of bees must be taken from the first stock frame next to the brood or even better if it is taken from the first brood frame, ensuring that the queen is not present on that frame. If supers are present, the sample can be taken from the first super above the nest to reduce the risk of taking also the queen, however, in the latter case, the number of Varroa mites found can be underestimated. It is important to always carry out the same type of sampling in order to be able to compare the results with each other (e.g. sampling from nurse bees at the center of the nest; sampling from foragers at the sides of the nest; sampling from a super).

To collect the bees you can use a jar with a soft edge or apply a sheet of paper or plastic on which the bees are shaken. Once the bee sample has been taken and placed inside a plastic or glass jar equipped with a mesh cap capable of allowing the Varroa mites to pass through but not the bees. The same type of jar can be used for both methods.

Once the jar with the mesh cap has been constructed and the bee sample has been taken, powders or liquids are used to make the Varroa mites detach from the bees. The most commonly used materials are icing sugar or alcohol.

1. Icing sugar method

The icing sugar method consists of placing the freshly collected bee sample in the jar in which there are already three tablespoons of icing sugar. Turn the jar with your hands (keeping it in a vertical position) for 60 seconds so that all the bees are covered by the sugar. The jar is then left in the shade for another 2-3 minutes and is finally shaken like a salt shaker on a white sheet or in a tray of water. The number of mites that have been detached from the bee sample is then counted on the sheet or the tray.

2. Washing in alcohol

The bee sample is placed in the jar filled with mixture of water and alcohol. A 70% solution of alcohol (which can be obtained by adding 285ml of tap water to 1 liter of denatured alcohol having a concentration of 90%) can be used for this method. Before closing the sampling jar with the cap, one cap of 70% alcohol solution must be added to the jar containing the bee sample so that the final sample could be shaken. The number of Varroa mites detaching from the bees depend on the agitation time. The most accurate method is to shake the solution (by hand or in the laboratory) for 15 to 30 minutes. Although this solution is not applicable on a large scale and on-field, a sufficiently accurate estimate is obtained even after just 5 minutes of manual stirring. Automatic shakers are available which increase the accuracy of the measurement. Next, the cap must be removed and exchanged to the mesh cap to separate the bees from the alcohol solution containing the Varroa mites. The solution is placed in a large basin and the mites removed from the bee sample are counted. The alcohol solution can then be filtered through a sock and reused until it becomes too cloudy to visualize the mites well.

As a result of both the alcohol washing method and the icing sugar method, the Varroa infestation level will be givenas a percentage value for the infestation of adult bees: the number of Varroa mites found in the sample must be divided by 350 and then multiplied by 100. For example, if we found 3 Varroa mites after shaking them in the alcohol solution: (3/350)x100=0.85, so the infestation level of adult bees present in the given sample is 0.85%.

WHEN AND HOW TO USE THE DIFFERENT METHODS

Depending on the time of year and the development phase of the colonies, monitoring Varroa mites allows the beekeeper to obtain a lot of information. The best methods to use based on the season and the levels of attention that must not be exceeded are as follows:

IN SPRING: The quantity of brood is generally high and continuously increasing. The method that estimates the Varroa infestation level the best is the natural shedding of the mites, carried out for at least 10 days in a row. Other methods for assessing the level of infestation underestimate the real values ​​as the Varroa mites present on adult bees is only a small part of the total Varroa population in the hive. The only exception may be the collected swarms that can be evaluated with the methods of icing sugar or washing in alcohol before the operculate brood is present. Attention levels: Natural shedding: ≥3 Varroa mites/day. Powdered sugar or alcohol wash (only on swarms): >1%.

IN SUMMER: The summer assessment of Varroa infestation levels can be carried out for two purposes: 1) to choose the best time for treatment and/or 2) to evaluate the effectiveness of the acaricide treatment carried out. Both the natural fall and the icing sugar or alcohol washing method provide a reliable value of the Varroa infestation level. Choose the method that best suits your business needs. Attention levels:

Before anti-varroa treatment:

  • Natural shedding: ≥10 Varroa mite/day
  • Powdered sugar or alcohol wash: >3%

After anti-varroa treatment:

  • Natural shedding: >1 Varroa mite/day
  • Powdered sugar or alcohol wash: >1%

IN AUTUMN: The evaluation of Varroa infestation levels during autumn allows the beekeepers to know if the bees to be born during the winter will have an excessive level of Varroa infestation, and therefore will be prone to honey bee viral diseases. Both the natural fall and the icing sugar or alcohol washing method are reliable to estimate the Varroa mite infestation level. Choose the method that best suits your business needs.

Attention levels:

  • Natural shedding: >1 Varroa mite/day
  • Powdered sugar or alcohol wash: >1%

IN WINTER: During winter, evaluating the level of Varroa mite infestation allows you to know the quantity of Varroa present and to choose the time for winter treatment as well as to verify the effectiveness of the antivarroa treatment carried out. Natural fall is the least invasive method that allows obtaining a reliable value of the Varroa mite infestation level during winter.

Attention levels:

Before anti-varroa treatment:

  • Natural shedding: ≥10 Varroa mite/day

After anti-varroa treatment:

  • Natural shedding: >1 Varroa mite/day

For assessing the average Varroa mite infestation level, each apiary must be considered as a single unit.

The number of bee hives to sample within an apiary depends on the total number of hives present:

1-8 hives in the apiary -> all hives are to be sampled

8-10 hives in the apiary -> 8 hives are to be sampled

10-20 hives in the apiary -> 8 hives are to be sampled

>20 hives in the apiary -> 8 hives to be sampled

The hives selected for monitoring must have average colony strength (based on the number of frames covered with bees and brood) and a viable and laying queen. All infestation data relating to the different apiaries must always be recorded and stored in order comparison with further data. To obtain reliable and comparable results, the Varroa mite infestation level should be assessed always applying the same method at the specific time of the year. The data can be compared only after a few years, and ad hoc treatments/selection plans for the area where we the bees are kept can be developed.

Warnings: May depend on the regulations in force in the given country.

Please check out the B-THENET Platform for the Best Beekeeping Practices tailored to each country, co-developed with practicing beekeepers in the National B-THENET Centres of those countries (Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden). 
 

Theft of both hives and full supers is an increasingly frequent phenomenon that needs to be tackled.

The main type of tools and devices available commercially for preventing hive thefts:

  • Fences
  • Video cameras and camera traps
  • Anti-theft devices

Preventing the theft of hives or other apiary materials and tools can be very important, especially in isolated, abandoned areas. The main precaution that can be applied: keep the hives in closed and fenced areas where it can be easily supervised by the beekeeper or by trusted people (also via video), use anti-theft devices for the hives, and secure the hives to the supports.

Enclosing the apiary with protective nets and gates can be important to discourage or hinder thieves. Furthermore, setting up a fence also helps to prevent damage and burglary.

Photo traps or video surveillance cameras must be used in accordance with the national legislation, including the display of a specific warnings. The video-surveillance area should not extend to places outside one's private property and its immediate vicinity.

Theft alarms send a real-time alarm on the beekeeper's mobile phone and help to geolocate the stolen hive. Such a device can be hidden e.g. in a nest frame. To avoid any theft of the devices, it is advisable to set the device alarm so that it gives the alarm with a certain delay (otherwise the location of those devices can be identified easily).

Branding the hives and frames can also be a method of deterring theft. The tracking devices have an initial and maintenance cost, however, such devices should not be inserted all the hives but only in one or two hives per apiary. 

Warnings: May depend on the regulations in force in the given country.

Please check out the B-THENET Platform for the Best Beekeeping Practices tailored to each country, co-developed with practicing beekeepers in the National B-THENET Centres of those countries (Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden).

Maintaining an adequate distance between apiaries is important for management and health issues.

Regarding the distances between apiaries, it is important to specify whether we are referring to the distances between the apiaries of the same beekeeper or the distances between the apiaries of different beekeepers.

For apiaries belonging to the same beekeeper, it is recommended to have a distance of at least 3 km among the apiaries. In this way, the bees of one apiary will not be in contact with those of other apiaries and also it is possible to move hives or nuclei between one apiary and another without the risk of the foragers returning to their initial position. Furthermore, in the event of diseases or cases of parasitic re-infestations it is possible to intervene or isolate only the apiaries affected, while if they were less than 3 km away it would be necessary to intervene or isolate all those within a 3 km radius of the apiary having health issues.

For the distances between apiaries of different beekeepers, the national legislation can provide a mandatory minimum distance.

Another aspect linked to the distance from other apiaries is productivity (based on the season, flowering, etc.). Maintaining active communication with the neighbouring beekeepers is always important. Abandoned apiaries or those not bearing the registration code can be reported (based on the national legislation). It is also important to consider the geographical qualities of the foraging territory (for example, a pasture between two slopes compared to one on the plain). The distance among small apiaries should also be considered (e.g. many small apiaries close to each other can still create a bigger problem compared to two large apiaries set-up at larger distances apart). Veterinary associations and official veterinary services can disseminate disease prevention and treatment protocols for apiaries, especially in areas with a high density of apiaries. To guarantee genetic isolation, greater distances (even greater than 10 km) between two apiaries could be advantageous.

Warnings: May depend on the regulations in force in the given country.

Please check out the B-THENET Platform for the Best Beekeeping Practices tailored to each country, co-developed with practicing beekeepers in the National B-THENET Centres of those countries (Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden).

Areas exposed to humidity or excessive wind shoudl be avoided for the apiary.

Excessive humidity and wind are poorly tolerated by bees and can favor the onset or worsening of honey bee diseases such as nosemosis or mycosis. To avoid excess humidity, it is important to avoid extremely shaded areas and areas where fog persists. Excess wind can drastically reduce the flying and foraging activity of bees, as well as the productivity and well-being of the honey bees. Furthermore, strong wind can uncover or even overturn the hives or swarm carriers. To reduce the impact of the wind, the area should be well known and mapped, and advantage must be taken from the wood patches and tree-lined areas that can protect the hives from the stronger wind blow.

Placing the hives in areas with wood can be useful to reduce the effect of the wind, but in autumn and winter there should not be excessive humidity. It is important not to place the hives directly on the ground. This is both to prevent the wood from being damaged and to prevent humidity from entering the hive. It is important that the hives are of good quality and well maintained to avoid water infiltration (and ensure adequate thermal insulation). If possible, increase the roof covering to reduce the possibility of the external side walls of the hive getting wet. Avoid placing hives near watercourses and wetlands (e.g. lakes, ponds, etc.) and depression areas. It is important to make an on-site assessment to understand: the altitude of the terrain, any wind barriers present (or what kind of such barriers can be set up), the trend of the prevailing winds, and to reduce the exposure of the bees to the latter.

Warnings: May depend on the regulations in force in the given country.

Please check out the B-THENET Platform for the Best Beekeeping Practices tailored to each country, co-developed with practicing beekeepers in the National B-THENET Centres of those countries (Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden).

Bees can collect nectars or pollen which can have allergenic or toxic effects on people.

In certain countries, this problem mainly concerns the collection and production of pollen. Pollen collected by bees can trigger allergic reactions in people sensitive to the given allergen if inhaled or ingested. In this case placing bees for pollen production in areas where plants that most frequently cause allergic reactions are present (such as parietaria, cypress, hornbeam, goldenrod, sunflower, etc.) should be avoided. However, there could also be accidental contamination. For pollen allergies, it is essential to inform the consumer that the intake of bee pollen can trigger allergic reactions in sensitive individuals. As regards toxic plants, the greatest risk is the presence of pyrrolizidine alkaloids in the pollen. Such alkaloids can be found in plants of botanical families such as: Boraginaceae, Asteraceae, Orchidaceae, and Leguminosae, less frequently in Convolvulaceae and Poaceae, and in at least one species of the Lamiaceae. Another toxic plant is the rhododendron. It is advisable to avoid areas with a high presence of these plants and to carry out laboratory analyzes to search for pyrrolizidine alkaloids in the final honey product.

Warnings: May depend on the regulations in force in the given country.

Please check out the B-THENET Platform for the Best Beekeeping Practices tailored to each country, co-developed with practicing beekeepers in the National B-THENET Centres of those countries (Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden).

The accessibility of the apiary with vehicles is crucial for the efficiency of the beekeeper's work and to ensure timely intervention in the hives when needed.

All apiaries should be easily accessible with vehicles in all seasons of the year.

The advantages of the accessibility are numerous:

  • the apiary can be visited more frequently,
  • help could be obtained more quickly,
  • loading and unloading can be more safe,
  • hives can be retrieved more quickly in case of fire.

Combine the proximity of the road with a passage behind the hives.

Check regional regulations to identify the minimum distance from roads and prefer secondary roads to main roads to limit vehicle pollution.

Parking the vehicles a few metres (2-3 metres) from the hives is optimal. In this way, loading and unloading of any type of materials and tools (smokers, frames, honeycombs, nutrients, hives themselves during transfers) will be easier and smoother.

Furthermore, it will be easier to make timely interventions in case of need for emergency nutrition or transfer of the apiary to avoid risks of phytosanitary treatments or other. The use of mulch under the hives can prevent agricultural vehicles from going too close to the hives. It is also important to safeguard the apiary from theft and keep the vehicle passage area clear to avoid accidents and punctures.

Warnings: May depend on the regulations in force in the given country.

Please check out the B-THENET Platform for the Best Beekeeping Practices tailored to each country, co-developed with practicing beekeepers in the National B-THENET Centres of those countries (Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden).

Avoiding exposure to pollutants is crucial both for the well-being and survival of the hives and for the quality of the bee products.

The main sources of contamination are undoubtedly the phytosanitary treatments carried out in agriculture. This is why it is essential to know the area around the apiary in order to assess whether there are crops that are likely or certain to need treatment, evaluating whether the apiary should be set up there and if so, whether there are times when it needs to be relocated. The most dangerous active ingredients in terms of toxicity to bees are insecticide and acaricide treatments, but fungicide and herbicide treatments can also have a detrimental effect on the hives.

To avoid industrial pollution, the apiaries should not be installed apiaries near industrial plants, incinerators and landfills.

Pollution caused by busy roads appears to be less impactful on the quality of bee products than other forms of pollution and contamination. However, it is advisable not to place bees near such roads to avoid the risks of collision with vehicles that might lead to a high mortality of foraging bees. It would be advisable, in such cases, to provide hedges or obstacles to avoid direct collision of bees with high-speed vehicles on particularly busy roads such as freeways/highways.

One of the main sources of the contamination and intoxication occurring in the apiaries is the use of pesticides. It is always necessary to be aware of the pesticides used in the vicinity of the apiary and the times when treatments are carried out on crops.

Fungicides and herbicides can also dangerous for the bees (chronic poisoning).

Assessing the area around the apiary (also by means of ortophotos available on the internet) is important for evaluating possible sources of pollution.

Please note that the responsibility for the quality and healthiness of hive products lies with the beekeeper.

In case of apiaries where the bees might come into contact with pesticides, a regular communication about the pesticide and other treatments should be established between the beekeepers and the farmers. When needed, appropriate actions such as closing or moving hives should be taken. However, the optimal solution is avoiding the vicinity of conventional agriculture when setting up an apiary.

When abnormal mortality of the bees occur, notify the official veterinary services of the local health authority.

Insecticide treatments carried out in residential, urban and peri-urban areas to control mosquitoes should also be considered. These treatments are linked to the local regulations.
It should be borne in mind that apartment blocks and private individuals also often use mosquito repellents.

Warnings: May depend on the regulations in force in the given country.

Please check out the B-THENET Platform for the Best Beekeeping Practices tailored to each country, co-developed with practicing beekeepers in the National B-THENET Centres of those countries (Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden).

Maintaining an adequate number of hives is important for proper management of beekeeping activities and for high quality and efficiency of work.

The appropriate number of hives may vary from person to person and from farm to farm and must take into account

  • the time that can be devoted to work and the number of people who can work in the apiary on a regular or seasonal basis, and
  • the company's infrastructure, in particular the availability of space in the warehouse and in the hive.

As regards time and work capacity, the maximum number of hives should be assessed by considering the working time required for peak activity periods, i.e. in case of swarming control, antivarroa treatments, and honey extraction.

Always assess the technical, logistical and timely constraints when determining the number of hives to maintain. Excessive numbers might result in disadvantage.

The following aspects should be regarded:

  1. Maintain an adequate distance between apiaries in the same area (to avoid overcrowding).
  2. Maintain an adequate distance between hives (not too far apart and not too close together, e.g. 40-50 cm) also considering space for manoeuvring to work.
  3. Set up a number of hives that is appropriate to the destination of the apiary (for family consumption, or for sale) and to the management practices to be adopted (e.g. appropriate swarming containment).
  4. Consider starting economic resources to ensure adequate minimum management.
  5. Consider one's skill level when deciding how many hives to purchase/manage (start gradually from a smaller number and then increase).
  6. Consider the appropriate number of families in an apiary to optimise movement and management (e.g. 40 hives per trip/day) in relation to one's own capacity and production focus.

Concerning space in the warehouse and in the honey house, the volume of space in particular for the honeycomb (at least 2-3 per hive), plus additional space for other materials and equipment, should be also considered.

Having adequate storage space, proportionate to the number of hives, is important to ensure good work efficiency.

Warnings: May depend on the regulations in force in the given country.

Please check out the B-THENET Platform for the Best Beekeeping Practices tailored to each country, co-developed with practicing beekeepers in the National B-THENET Centres of those countries (Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden).

Maintaining a safe distance from houses and villages or to use devices that minimise risks to people is indispensable in beekeeping.

People should be prevented from passing or interfering with the flight paths of bees.

The national law might set a minimum distance between the hives and the from borders of any other properties.

These provisions also apply in the case of urban beekeeping. A hive can therefore hardly be placed on a balcony (because it is too close to other apartments or offices), whereas it might be placed on the roof -  all in accordance with the national legislation.

The national regulations might also set a minimum distance for hives from sugar refineries. For keeping that distance, the nectar flow around the apiary must be evaluated because if there is a shortage in nectars during the season, the bees might forage at greater distances and can reach the sugar refinery. Placing the apiary minimum 4-5 km away from the sugar refinery might decrease the possibility of bees foraging in the area of the industrial plant.

To guarantee adequate safety not only the minimal distances should be considered: the usual use of the surroundings of the apiary must also be assessed to avoid the risk of even accidental contact with flying bees.

In addition to the physical safety of people, other aspects of the vicinity of an apiary must be also taken into consideration:

  • the littering of facades, furniture and clothes by the bees,
  • the presence of bees drinking at the edge of pools during the summer,
  • the formation of swarms (especially during the spring period).

In the first case, it is important to assess the main flight directions of bees. In the second case, it might be useful (but sometimes not sufficient) to ensure the presence of drinking possibilities at the hives in order to offer the bees a more convenient source of water and to prevent them from drinking at the pools.

Having a liability insurance can be advantageous.

Minimum distances from given areas might be reduced if barriers, such as hedges, natural slopes, or other barriers at least 2 metres high are present.

Warnings: May depend on the regulations in force in the given country.

Please check out the B-THENET Platform for the Best Beekeeping Practices tailored to each country, co-developed with practicing beekeepers in the National B-THENET Centres of those countries (Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden).

Having adequate space (warehouses, canopies) for storage and working tools is necessary for efficient work.

The storage volume shoudl be calculated considering:

  • 3 honeycombs for each hive,
  • an additional space for storing other materials (50% to 100% more than the volume occupied by the honeycombs), and
  • a working space at least 1.5 metres wide in front of the stored materials.

Pest management (especially against mice and ants) is indispensable in the storage area. The storage should be ventilated enough (through windows of artificial ventilation) to prevent moisture stagnation and the formation of mould. However, it is essential that all openings are adequately protected to prevent the entry of bees or pests such as ants, moths and mice.

Warnings: May depend on the regulations in force in the given country.

Please check out the B-THENET Platform for the Best Beekeeping Practices tailored to each country, co-developed with practicing beekeepers in the National B-THENET Centres of those countries (Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden).

 

Trees can be valuable for the prevention of atmospheric stress on the bee hives.

In particular, they can:

-provide protection from prevailing winds, and

-provide shade in summer.

Forest patches, rows of trees or even hedges can be used for protection from prevailing wind, provided they are of a certain height (at least 3 metres). The presence of areas with wooded patches or strips makes it possible not only to directly protect the hives from the risk of overhanging or toppling over, but also to guarantee protected flying spaces even in case of strong wind.

Shading in summer can be very important for two goals: reducing the need for ventilation and thus saving work and honey consumption, and guaranteeing safer situations for antivarroa treatments with evaporating active ingredients such as thymol and formic acid. In summer, the shade of the trees is an advantage for both bees and beekeepers.

In any case, it is good to ensure that the presence of trees does not create conditions of excessive shade and humidity in winter and spring. For this reason, deciduous trees are preferable to evergreen ones in the case of stationary apiaries.

It is obviously important to be sure of the stability of these trees to prevent them from falling and causing damage to the hives or the people working under them.

Particular attention should be paid to breeding nuclei as such colonies have greater difficulty in thermoregulating.

In sedentary apiaries (maximum 50 hives), wood/iron structures could be built inexpensively (e.g. from bamboo fence panels).

Warnings: May depend on the regulations in force in the given country.

Please check out the B-THENET Platform for the Best Beekeeping Practices tailored to each country, co-developed with practicing beekeepers in the National B-THENET Centres of those countries (Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden).

 

It is important to avoid obstacles that make it difficult or troublesome to fly for the bees.

The grass and vegetation around the hive should be cut short (always while using appropriate personal protection), so that it does not obstruct the hive opening and prevents or makes it difficult for foraging bees to enter and exit the hive.

Bees must avoid crossing busy roads or railways to avoid the risk of impact with vehicles. If necessary, it is important that the bees cross these areas at a flight height that ensures safety. This can be done by putting up a physical barrier (hedge, wall, cloth, etc.) that forces the bees to fly upwards and reach a safe height before flying over the road.

Avoid installing hives in very windy areas: strong wind prevents flight activity. If this is not possible, install 'green' barriers to protect the apiary from wind exposure.

Tall grass in front of the hive entrance can, however, bring several advantages: reduction of drift and looting, reduction of wasp attack, and partial protection from the wind. Reduce the strip of tall grass in front of the hives to a minimum (to avoid fires, etc.).

Warnings: May depend on the regulations in force in the given country.

Please check out the B-THENET Platform for the Best Beekeeping Practices tailored to each country, co-developed with practicing beekeepers in the National B-THENET Centres of those countries (Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden).

 

The correct positioning of the hive is important for the activity and well-being of the bees and for the quality and efficiency of the beekeeper's work.

For the activity and well-being of bees, the hive must be positioned on an even and stable surface so as to avoid the risk of tipping, and the opening of the hives should face south, if possible.

For the safety of the beekeeper, the hives should be placed as high as it is comfortable for the beekeeper: hive management should be possible without bending over the hives and the lifting of the hives should be possible with the smallest possible movement.

On average, if the hive is placed 40-50 cm high, both moisture originatng from the ground and the entering of small reptiles, beetles, or mice can be prevented.

Iron, wood or concrete posts can be used for supports. Each material has its advantages and disadvantages:

ADVANTAGES
Iron: practical (single structure), light, cheap
Wood: sustainable, non-slip, lightweight
Cement: economical (vineyard poles), non-slip

DISADVANTAGES
Iron: possible slipping of hives, vibration, painting, thermal conductivity
Wood: cost, maintenance (deterioration)
Cement: heavy

The suitability of the materials used should be assessed on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration also the total wight of the final structure.

Using a spirit level to adjust the base is important to prevent the hives from tipping over, especially when there are many honeycombs that can cause unbalance. If the hive is slightly tilted forwards, the condensation water can evaporate more easily. Position the hives so that the flight direction of the bees does not interfere with the passage of agricultural vehicles or people. The base of the supports must rest on stable, solid ground and/or should be sufficiently wide.

Warnings: May depend on the regulations in force in the given country.

Please check out the B-THENET Platform for the Best Beekeeping Practices tailored to each country, co-developed with practicing beekeepers in the National B-THENET Centres of those countries (Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden).

 

Seasonal relocation of the apiary might be useful or necessary to achieve higher production, ensure better overwintering, guarantee better hive development, and avoid phytosanitary treatments.

For the relocation of the apiaries, the following factors must be considered:

  1. Means of transport (trucks, vans, pick-ups, trailers)
  2. Lifting equipment (forklifts, hydraulic platforms, cranes)
  3. Hives with efficient closures and large ventilation areas

The new site should be chosen according to the various needs within the apiary. E.g., to obtain greater production, a site with an abundance of nectariferous and/or polleniferous blooms should be identified. For better wintering, the site should be sunny, with low humidity, possibly with minimum temperatures that are not excessively cold, and easily accessible in all weather conditions. For better hive or nucleus development, it is important to have a site rich in pollen and also nectar, having mild temperature in spring and not excessively hot and dry in summer. To avoid phytosanitary treatments, the new site should be far from agricultural crop fields, or else, those crops should not require such treatments at that time.

Preparation of hives for the relocation: the hives must be closed to prevent the bees from getting out, but, at the same time, should have large ventilation surfaces to ensure heat dispersion and the passage of air, therefore, removing the sheet metal at the bottom of the hive during hot periods might be advantageous. Hives must be closed when there is no flying activity, i.e. in dark or in case pf rainfalls.

Tips for closing the hives: turn the cover over, tape it shut, place the three-position disc in 'net' mode, do not place the cover, use jack straps and rope between the handles on the outside of the load.

Means of transfer: Trucks, pick-ups, and tow trucks can be used. Closed vehicles such as vans or tarpaulin trucks might also be used. Pallets, cranes, and moving walkways can be used to facilitate the loading and unloading of the hives. In the case of transport with a tarpaulin truck (well-closed), the hives can be kept open to avoid overheating.

Time and mode of travel: The transfer should be done as quickly as possible to reduce the stress for the hives. During th etransfer, breaks should be avoided, unless inevitable.

Warnings: May depend on the regulations in force in the given country.

Please check out the B-THENET Platform for the Best Beekeeping Practices tailored to each country, co-developed with practicing beekeepers in the National B-THENET Centres of those countries (Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden).

Contacts

Project email

Project coordinator

  • ISTITUTO ZOOPROFILATTICO SPERIMENTALE DELLE REGIONI LAZIO E TOSCANA

    Project coordinator

Project partners

  • AGENZIA PER LA PROMOZIONE DELLA RICERCA EUROPEA

    Project partner

  • FEDERATION INTERNATIONAL DES ASSOCIATIONS D APICULTURE APIMONDIA

    Project partner

  • GLOBAZ, S.A.

    Project partner

  • SVERIGES LANTBRUKSUNIVERSITET

    Project partner

  • BEE LIFE EUROPEAN BEEKEEPING COORDINATION

    Project partner

  • DANMARKS BIAVLERFORENING

    Project partner

  • CEBELARSKA ZVEZA SLOVENIJE

    Project partner

  • UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID

    Project partner

  • ELLINIKOS GEORGIKOS ORGANISMOS - DIMITRA

    Project partner

  • UNIVERSITY OF ZAGREB-FACULTY OF VETERINARY MEDICINE

    Project partner

  • INSTYTUT OGRODNICTWA - PANSTWOWY INSTYTUT BADAWCZY

    Project partner

  • UNIVERZITA VETERINARSKEHO LEKARSTVA A FARMACIE V KOSICIACH

    Project partner

  • UNIVERSITEIT GENT

    Project partner

  • UNIVERSITAET HOHENHEIM

    Project partner

  • Latvijas Biozinātņu un tehnoloģiju universitāte

    Project partner

  • UNIVERSITY OF VETERINARY MEDICINE BUDAPEST

    Project partner

  • UNIVERSITAET GRAZ

    Project partner