Kontext
Recent research knowledge has demonstrated that implementing evidence-based management strategies on farm reduces injurious pecking and levels of plumage damage and mortality (Lambton et al, 2013) and that the degree of uptake vaies between farms. There is further evidence that levels of plumage damage vary between farms but that these can improve with monitoring and provision of information by assurance schemes (Mullan et al, 2016). Thus a stakeholder group (BTAG) recommended that all farmers develop and implement action plans for reducing levels of injurious pecking. A recent study (Palczynski et al, 2016) exploring barriers to farmers implementing management strategies to control injurious pecking has indicated a need for impartial, evidence-based knowledge that not only enables them to recognise when they have a problem, but how to monitor it and take action. The project will therefore create knowledge transfer materials and opportunities and use best practice examples to inspire uptake of science-based and practice-based knowledge.
Objectives
The main objective is to reduce injurious pecking in all commercial laying hen flocks as poor feather cover and pecking damage is associated with reduced health, increased mortality and inefficient use of feed with lower egg output in all types of laying systems. The Laying Hen welfare Forum also have the objective of avoiding a ‘beak trimming ban’ by reducing feather pecking in flocks. With injurious pecking on-farm losses estimated at over £16 million the project will improve the sustainability and productivity of the laying hen industry and the welfare of the hens, with additional societal benefits.
Objectives
The main objective is to reduce injurious pecking in all commercial laying hen flocks as poor feather cover and pecking damage is associated with reduced health, increased mortality and inefficient use of feed with lower egg output in all types of laying systems. The Laying Hen welfare Forum also have the objective of avoiding a ‘beak trimming ban’ by reducing feather pecking in flocks. With injurious pecking on-farm losses estimated at over £16 million the project will improve the sustainability and productivity of the laying hen industry and the welfare of the hens, with additional societal benefits.
Activities
The three key strategies will be, 1) a full written management document for the rearing period covering vaccinations, lighting, featherwell measures, perch provision, 2) The active monitoring and recording of the laying flocks health, welfare and disease status by having an active timeline /action document appended to the farms ‘Veterinary Health Program’ (VHP) to provide an active VHP which is overseen by a nominate veterinary surgeon and finally 3) the maintenance of good litter quality throughout the laying period.
Activities
The three key strategies will be, 1) a full written management document for the rearing period covering vaccinations, lighting, featherwell measures, perch provision, 2) The active monitoring and recording of the laying flocks health, welfare and disease status by having an active timeline /action document appended to the farms ‘Veterinary Health Program’ (VHP) to provide an active VHP which is overseen by a nominate veterinary surgeon and finally 3) the maintenance of good litter quality throughout the laying period.
Project details
- Main funding source
- Rural development 2014-2020 for Operational Groups
- Rural Development Programme
- 2014UK06RDRP001 United Kingdom - Rural Development Programme (Regional) - England
Ort
- Main geographical location
- Inner London - East
EUR 120 000.00
Total budget
Total contributions from EAFRD, national co-financing, additional national financing and other financing.
Project keyword
Ressourcen
Links
Contacts
Project coordinator
-
British Egg Industrty Council
Project coordinator