project - EIP-AGRI Operational Group

Innovative approaches to assessing economic and ecological impacts of digitally supported fertilization systems to improve N efficiency
Innovative Ansätze zur Bewertung ökonomischer und ökologischer Auswirkungen digital unterstützter Düngesysteme zur Verbesserung der N-Effizienz

To download the project in a PDF format, please click on the print button and save the page as PDF
Ongoing | - Austria
Ongoing | - Austria
Derzeit wird der Seiteninhalt nach Möglichkeit in der Muttersprache angezeigt

Kontext

The widespread use of mineral nitrogen fertilizers such as calcium ammonium nitrate and urea in Austria leads to significant environmental impacts. Firstly, these fertilizers contribute to annual emissions averaging 50 kt CO2e, as reported by the greenhouse gas inventory. Thus, reducing their application would mitigate agricultural greenhouse gas emissions. Secondly, the highly soluble nitrogen compound nitrate (NO3) from these fertilizers significantly contaminates groundwater, with several areas currently exceeding threshold values, necessitating restrictions on fertilization measures. Addressing this issue while sustaining agricultural production is a crucial objective.

The project aims to introduce an innovative solution within practical conditions in Austrian agriculture. Based on literature from Switzerland, the CULTAN method demonstrates potential for mitigating nitrate leaching risks. However, comparable results under Austrian field conditions are currently lacking. While CULTAN offers environmental benefits depending on fertilizer application frequency tailored to crop needs, its impact on grain quality remains uncertain under Austrian conditions. Moreover, employing carbon-free fertilizers in CULTAN could notably reduce CO2 emissions compared to conventional fertilizers. Despite the potential benefits, uncertainties persist regarding the cost-effectiveness of CULTAN under diverse Austrian field conditions.

Previous projects like GIS-ELA 1 and 2, in conjunction with the TerraZo internet platform, have primarily focused on standard fertilization. These efforts have shown promising results in reducing fertilizer input and associated emissions. Additionally, site-specific fertilization, as demonstrated by Sinabell, Kastenhofer, and Prankl (2023), proves economically advantageous. While CULTAN fertilization shows promise in further reducing emissions, its cost-benefit ratio under various field conditions in Austria remains to be determined.

Activities

The present project deals with the effects of site-specific nitrogen fertilization and Controlled Uptake Long Term Ammonium Nutrition (Cultan method) on nitrogen efficiency and profitability. When evaluating nitrogen efficiency, the goal is to achieve the highest possible yield (CO2 sequestration) per kg of nitrogen while avoiding any loss of soil fertility (humus depletion caused by nitrogen deficiency) (fertilization to demand). Site-specific fertilization aims, on the one hand, to address the effective demand of the (as precisely as possible) detectable plant location and, on the other hand, to increase the yield potential of the respective plant location through different distributions. With ammonium, and specifically with Cultan nutrition, the aim is to reduce potential losses by binding ammonium to soil colloids (clay colloids) or by inhibiting nitrification. The project is based on field trials conducted on the agricultural farms of the OG members. For assessing the possible efficiency improvements through the respective or combined fertilization strategy, the following comparable parameters shall be collected in the necessary trails:

  • soil analysis
  • Yield and protein content of the harvested crop
  • Straw yield including determination of dry matter content, carbon, and nitrogen content
  • Biomass production of cover crops
  • Soil nitrogen mineralization trend
  • Biomass trend in the Cultan and comparison variants
  • Final soil analysis (including carbon content, total nitrogen content, pH value)
  • Reflectance measurement data (Sentinel-II data)
  • Working time of farmers
  • Machinery usage

Activities

x

Additional comments

The planned EIP project offers several concrete benefits for agricultural practice:

  • Many agricultural enterprises currently need to reduce fertilization in areas with groundwater contamination to lower nitrate (NO3) levels. CULTAN fertilization combined with site-specific fertilization presents another option for reducing contamination. The project delivers robust results representative of Austrian field conditions under practical circumstances.
  • The project demonstrates the potential reduction in greenhouse gas emissions achievable by replacing standard fertilization with CULTAN fertilization. This is crucial for estimating the emission reduction potential of this technique and allows for extrapolation to Austria.
  • The active involvement of farmers in the project provides reliable cost data collected under practical conditions. Consequently, it enables accurate estimation of additional costs and extra labor.
  • Farmers interested in reducing their carbon footprint without completely changing their operational processes (e.g., switching from conventional to organic farming) can use the project's results to adjust their production processes and quantify the specific benefits. The expected additional costs for each farm can be derived from the results and compared against the achievable benefits.
  • Farms already implementing site-specific fertilization learn from the project how to integrate this innovative fertilization method into their operational workflows.
Project details
Main funding source
CAP Strategic Plans 2023-2027 for Operational Groups
Additional funding source
No additional funding source
Project contribution to EU Strategies
  • Reducing nutrient losses and the use of fertilisers, while maintaining soil fertility
  • Improving management of natural resources used by agriculture, such as water, soil and air
Territorial scope
National

Budget information

EUR 400 000.00
Total contribution
EAFRD contribution
EUR 212 104.20
National co-financing
EUR 187 895.80

Specific financial information not available.

Specific financial information not available.

Specific financial information not available.

Ressourcen

Derzeit wird der Seiteninhalt nach Möglichkeit in der Muttersprache angezeigt

1 Practice Abstracts

The project examines the following issues:

  • How does the application of CULTAN fertilisation to arable farms and practical conditions work in Austria? What are the difficulties and what recommendations can be drawn?
  • What are the additional costs (machinery, fertilisers) and the additional workload? What are the cost savings to be achieved under practical conditions?
  • What is the impact of CULTAN fertilisation on the stock of mineralised N (Nmin) in soil at different points in time compared to the variant of standard fertilisation?
  • How do yields differ and are there differences in quality?
  • To what extent do adjustments and extensions need to be integrated into TerraZo to take account of this type of fertilisation?
  • What recommendations can be drawn for Austrian farms?
  • What are the conclusions for projects implementing N emission avoidance measures?
  • What are the conclusions for the Nitrates Action Programme and the Austrian greenhouse gas inventory?

Die Zielsetzung ist, Ackerbaubetrieben zu ermöglichen,

  • Nährstoffverluste und damit Gewässerbelastung zu vermeiden,
  • Treibhausgas-Emissionen gegenüber der herkömmlichen Düngung zu verringern und
  • durch Anwendung von Precision-Farming-Methoden und Digitalisierung produktiver und wettbewerbsfähiger zu werden.
  • Feldversuche werden dazu durchgeführt, um die Wirksamkeit der Maßnahmen und Wirtschaftlichkeit zu demonstrieren. Die Ergebnisse werden in Schulen, in Fachartikeln, Papers, Webinaren und einem digitalen Schulungstool disseminiert.

Im Projekt werden die folgenden Sachverhalte untersucht:

  • Wie funktioniert die Anwendung der CULTAN-Düngung auf Ackerbaubetrieben und Praxisbedingungen in Österreich? Welche Schwierigkeiten gibt es und welche Empfehlungen lassen sich ableiten?
  • Wie hoch sind die Zusatzkosten (Maschinen, Düngemittel) und wie hoch ist der zusätzliche Arbeitsaufwand? Welche Kostenersparnisse sind unter Praxisbedingungen zu erzielen?
  • Welche Auswirkungen hat die CULTAN-Düngung auf den Vorrat von mineralisiertem N (Nmin) im Boden zu verschiedenen Zeitpunkten verglichen mit der Variante der Standard-Düngung?
  • Wie unterscheiden sich die Erträge und gibt es Qualitätsunterschiede?
  • Inwieweit müssen Anpassungen und Erweiterungen in TerraZo integriert werden, um dieser Art der Düngung Rechnung zu tragen?
  • Welche Empfehlungen lassen sich für österreichische landwirtschaftliche Betriebe ableiten?
  • Was sind die Schlussfolgerungen für Projekte, in denen Maßnahmen zur N-Emissionsvermeidung umgesetzt werden?
  • Welche Schlussfolgerungen ergeben sich für das Nitrat-Aktionsprogramm und die österreichische Inventur von Treibhausgasen?
Derzeit wird der Seiteninhalt nach Möglichkeit in der Muttersprache angezeigt

Contacts

Project coordinator

  • Project coordinator

Project partners

  • Project partner

  • Project partner

  • Project partner

  • Project partner

  • Project partner

  • Project partner

  • Project partner

  • Project partner