Learning from Research

Methodology for impact evaluation of digitalisation

This output is a methodological approach for a participatory qualitative impact evaluation of digitalisation.

Output Description

The starting point for this output is the need to evaluate the impact of digitalisation, given that agri-food systems, forestry and rural areas are undergoing a process of digital transformation. However, there is a lack of comparable statistical datasets to carry out robust counterfactual impact assessments at regional or local levels, except for data on fixed broadband coverage.  

Digitalisation or digital transformation is a process strictly connected to digitisation: i.e. the technical conversion of information from analogue to digital format. Through digitisation, data is generated from everyday life (“datafication”): peoples, social interactions, business activities or physical objects. However, digitalisation goes beyond digitisation (datafication).

This is why the DESIRA project developed a qualitative impact evaluation. The methodological approach for such a qualitative impact evaluation of digitalisation is a participatory one and is based on the conceptual framework of Socio-Cyber-Physical (SCPS) system. It links the analysis directly to the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals. 

A Socio-Cyber-Physical System can be understood as follows:

  1. A system is a set of entities with relations and interactions between them. These interactions can create new entities. The entities and the boundaries of a system are defined by the observer in relation to his/her purposes. Hence a description of a system is a representation of reality according to a specific observer.
  2. Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs) are next-generation engineered systems that integrate embedded computing technology (cyber part) into the physical phenomena by using transformative research approaches that account for the complexity and multi-disciplinarity of such systems.
  3.  A socio-technical system consists of social entities and technical entities that interact with each other and have equal importance in the understanding of socio-technical systems. Social actors all have various needs, wants, skills, knowledge. Technical entities are non-human entities, including technologies as well as processes surrounding those technologies.
  4. A SCPS consist of three domains (socio, cyber and physical) all of equal importance and with the ability to influence other domains. Each domain has a broad range of different entities governed by a set of rules, but also between domains hybrid rules determine the relations and interactions of the entities within the domains.

The methodology for a participatory qualitative impact evaluation of digitalisation includes two key components: 

1. Creation of Living Labs to conduct a Needs, Expectations, and Impact Assessment (NEI) 

To apply the participatory impact assessment, 21 DESIRA Living Labs were established composed of agriculture, forestry and rural stakeholders. Their objective was to gather stakeholders to conduct a Needs, Expectations, and Impact Assessment (NEI) of digitalisation.

Living Labs are a participatory tool increasingly applied in Europe for the involvement of users in technology development. The DESIRA Living Labs are networks of stakeholders established across Europe and selected to represent a variety of agricultural, rural and forestry domains. They are constituted around a focal question (e.g. How to reduce the risk of forest fires?) and co-develop ideas, scenarios, digital storytelling outputs, and socio-technical solutions related to digitalisation. Interaction in the networks is based on both face-to-face and online activities.

The first step was for each Living Lab to elaborate their own focal question. These questions allowed Living Labs to frame the scope, identify the specific topic, unit of analysis, geographic area, and possible hypothesis or sub- questions.  

Examples of focal questions include:

  • How can digital infrastructures be used to further support the economy and farmers’ / citizens’ income in rural communities in Greece?
  • How can digitalisation support and enforce the adoption of the European Timber Regulation (EUTR) concerning imported round wood in Austria?
  • How can digitalisation contribute to the sustainability of fruit production in the Lake of Constance region in Germany?
  • How can digitalisation contribute to reduce the damage caused by wildfires and to make more effective firefighting and degraded land restoration by 2030, in Andalucía in Spain?
  • How does digital technology contribute to the emergence of innovations in favour of agro-ecological transition in agriculture in France?
  • How can digitalisation support local livelihoods that contribute to rural regeneration and assist in the transition to a low carbon society, in Ireland?
  • How to strengthen the adoption of digital tools to support the wood-energy traceability over the whole supply chain in conformity to the compulsory EU Timber Regulation (995/2010) in Italian forests?
  • How can digitalisation improve the involvement of local communities in spatial planning processes in Poland?

The Living Labs applied the concept of Socio- Cyber-Physical Systems (SCPS) as an analytical lens to research and gain insights on its past and present impacts. To perform the NEI assessment, they used a mix of data collection toolsdesk research, semi- structured interviews, online surveys, interactive workshops. These were applied in three phases:  

  1. Living Labs' context analysis and assessment of main needs 
  2. Living Labs' description and visualisation of the Socio- Cyber-Physical Systems 
  3. Living Labs’ participatory impact assessment  

In this first phase, Living Labs analysed the context of their focal questions in terms of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT analysis). The SWOT analysis considered various dimensions, such as social, economic, governance, environmental, gender aspects, but paid more attention to the level of digitalisation, based on the Digital Economy and Society Index. This helped narrow down the analysis on major needs, elements, and issues at stake in the SCPS.

In this second phase, Living Labs mapped the SCPS providing the opportunity to visualise the relationships between entities across different or within the same domain (socio-socio, socio-cyber, etc.). They applied their own expertise and the DESIRA’s taxonomy and inventory of digital technologies.

In this third phase, impacts were assessed ex post (past and present). To engage stakeholders in the participatory assessment, impacts were defined as the direct and indirect, positive or negative implications of existing digitalisation upon the entities, relationships, activities mapped out by the LLs in their SCPS, as well as upon the 17 SDGs. These impacts were captured in qualitative terms based on the perception of the respondents and participants of LLs’ research activities.

Comparison analysis across the Living Labs 

The data colleted and analysed in the above three phases was compared across the 21 Living Labs using qualitative content analysis, summary statistics and literature review. The findings were firstly exchanged in a peer-to-peer meeting among Living Labs, then summarised in a Synthesis Report. 

Concerning the Living Labs' assessment of impacts, the comparison questions were addressed: 

  • What and how has digitalisation impacted the SCPS activities until today?  
  • Who benefits, loses, promotes, opposes to digitalisation, and why (under which conditions)?  
  • How has digitalisation contributed to the achievement of the 17 SDGs?  

Relevance for monitoring and evaluation of the CAP

This qualitative method based on the creation of Living Labs composed of key stakeholders who work together to answer focal questions using different qualitative and quantitative data collection tools, is an innovative method. It can be used by evaluators to assess the impacts of digitalisation, in the absence of more robust quantitative methods. It can also serve as a method to triangulate the findings of quantitative methods if they exist. 

The main benefits of this participatory method are: 

  • it is structured, through the creation of LIving Labs that centre their work on a limited number of focal questions; 
  • it is a comprehensive, i.e. it relies on a network of stakeholders established across Europe and selected to represent a variety of agricultural, rural and forestry domains; 
  • it provides answers to the focal questions that are evidence based and validated by the network of relevant stakeholders.  

The method can be used to assess the impacts of digitalisation on processes like supply chain management. It may assess effectiveness, i.e. the ability to achieve (or not) a desired goal or demand, or capacity to successfully execute an activity or process. For instance, the accomplishment of new tasks, the creation of new services and values, the achievement of undesired goals. It may also assess efficiency, i.e. the ratio of resource/output of an activity in a given time. 

Another useful element produced by the Living Labs was clustering the impacts qualitatively under enabling and disenabling effects (that influence effectiveness), diminishing and boosting effects (that influence efficiency). 

Finally, the method may be used to assess(qualitatively) the links between digitalisation the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). In the context of DESIRA, focus group discussions and interviews amongst Living Lab stakeholders identified the frequency of general perceptions on the extent of these contributions towards the SDGs. 

Relevance of the output per CAP Objectives

  • Specific Objective 2 - Increase competitiveness
  • Specific Objective 3 - Improve farmers' position in the food chain 
  • Specific Objective 4 - Climate change action 
  • Specific Objective 9 - Protect food and health quality
  • Cross-cutting Objective - Fostering knowledge and innovation

Additional output information

Data collection systems used:

  • Ad-hoc data collection

Type of output:

  • Methodology

Associated evaluation approaches:

  • Impact evaluation ex post
  • Impact evaluation ongoing

Spatial scale:

  • Regional
  • National

Project information

Desira Logo

Digitalisation: Economic and Social Impact in Rural Areas

DESIRA aims to improve the capacity of society and political bodies to respond to the challenges that digitalisation generates in agriculture, forestry and rural areas.

Specific objectives: 

  • Fill the socio-economic knowledge gaps on digitalisation in agriculture, forestry and rural areas.
  • Assess the past and current socio-economic impact of digitalisation in relation to Sustainable Development Goals. 
  • Improve the capacity of communities to reflect on future risks and opportunities of digitalisation.
  • Improve the capacity of rural communities to reap the opportunities offered by digitisation and to improve resilience related to associated risks.
  • Promote online and offline interaction and learning among a wide range of stakeholders.
  • Increase the uptake of societal concerns in ICT-related policy and innovation, and to align digitalisation scenarios with societal needs and expectations. 

Project’s timeframe: 01/06/2019 – 31/5/2023

Contact  of project holder: Gianluca Brunori, University of Pisa (gianluca.brunori@unipi.it

Website: DESIRA: https://desira2020.agr.unipi.it

CORDIS database: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/818194 

Territorial coverage:

Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Poland, Spain, The Netherlands