Sections
project - Research and innovation
Transformation for sustainable nutrient supply and management
Context
trans4num is a four-year project funded under the Zero Pollution call as an EU-China international cooperation action on nature-based solutions (NBS) for nutrient management in agriculture.
trans4num is a multi-actor project, coordinated by the University of Hohenheim, which brings together partners from 14 European countries. Check the Partners section on our website for more details.
trans4num will asses innovative NBS practices in 4 European countries and in 3 different locations in China. Check the NBS sites section for more details.
Objectives
trans4num ambition is to broadly enhance the NBS implementation in Europe with an integrative and tested multi-level approach, in dialogue with academic partners, practice partners and societal stakeholders by:
- Identifying and evaluating socially and contextually suitable transformation pathways towards a more sustainable nutrient management of N and P
- Developing a user-orientated decision support tool for regional nutrient management
- Generating and spreading practice-relevant assessments on the potentials of selected NBS for different agricultural systems, geographical and climatic zone
- Setting-up, testing and promoting a combined modelling of farm systems, value chain and food systems dynamics to generate robust multi-level evidence on the uptake and effects of innovative NBS
- Promoting outputs on NBS innovation
The objective is to develop and test innovative NBS practices and pathways that contribute to a socio-ecological transformation of existing intensive agriculture systems towards increasingly sustainable nutrient management.
- SO1. Develop, practice, and assess inter and transdisciplinary, systemic research conducive for a transformative learning approach towards sustainable agricultural practices.
- SO2. Develop a differentiated understanding of NBS potentials for sustainable agricultural practices in the context of intensive farming systems.
- SO3. Understand and analyse the complex interdependencies of applying NBS.
- SO4. Develop a dynamic and smart nutrient management tool to support decision making
- SO5. Provide an integrated assessment of food systems, value chains and policy levels’ leverage points for a robust transition to nature-based nutrient management in Europe and China
- SO6. Develop evidence-based knowledge, create awareness for necessary conditions in a food system context, disseminate information and recommendations related to the design, development and implementation of NBS in different farming systems.
- SO7. Enhance Europe-China exchange and learning process.
Activities
The project activities are structured into six work packages (WPs):
WP1: Understanding NBS, concepts and approaches
Key activities include developing a conceptual framework based on existing knowledge, creating joint approaches for interdisciplinary analyses of NBS, and reviewing transformation pathways for applying innovative NBS.
WP2: Explore innovative NBS in regions of intensive farming
Key activities include creating an online inventory of promising NBS, implementing and testing NBS in different regions (Hungary, Denmark, Netherlands, UK, and China), and describing NBS cases as agricultural innovation systems.
WP3: Monitor and optimise NBS related nutrient flows
Key activities include monitoring nutrient flows using satellite data, developing a decision support system for nutrient supply, testing the decision support system in case regions, and engaging with technology development actors through hackathons.
WP4: Assess NBS effects in a SET context
Key activities include conducting agent-based farm-level modelling, creating participatory stakeholder involvement for the design of social innovation and NBS related SET, and performing comparative assessments of NBS cases in the EU and China.
WP5: Scaling up and out: Communication and dissemination
Key activities include developing a communication and dissemination strategy, creating multimedia activities and using social media, designing communication material and practice-oriented dissemination material for different audiences, organising regional and international events, and implementing policy dialogues.
WP6: Project coordination and management
Key activities include progress monitoring and reporting, administrative and financial management, data management and protection of intellectual property rights (IPR), and ensuring effective cooperation between European and Chinese partners.
Other comments
As a guiding principle, trans4num seeks to make research data openly available, whenever possible, in order to allow dissemination, validation and re-use of research results. To this purpose, trans4num project will make extensive use of open access resources to publish the work, outcomes and results. To this end trans4num project actively contributes to the EU-FarmBook and Zenodo platforms.
Project details
- Main funding source
- Horizon Europe (EU Research and Innovation Programme)
- Type of Horizon project
- Multi-actor project
- Project acronym
- trans4num
- CORDIS Fact sheet
- Project contribution to CAP specific objectives
-
- SO4. Agriculture and climate mitigation
- SO5. Efficient soil management
- SO6. Biodiversity and farmed landscapes
- Preserving landscapes and biodiversity
- Fostering knowledge and innovation
- Project contribution to EU Strategies
-
- Reducing nutrient losses and the use of fertilisers, while maintaining soil fertility
- Improving management of natural resources used by agriculture, such as water, soil and air
- Protecting and/or restoring of biodiversity and ecosystem services within agrarian and forest systems
EUR 503 439 625.00
Total budget
Total contributions including EU funding.
EUR 461 712 338.00
EU contribution
Any type of EU funding.
Project keyword(s)
- Arable crops
- Circular economy, incl. waste, by-products and residues
- Crop rotation/crop diversification/dual-purpose or mixed cropping
- Biodiversity and nature
- Agro-ecology
- Food security, safety, quality, processing and nutrition
- Landscape/land management
- Pest/disease control in plants
- Plant nutrients
- Soil
- Water
Resources
Audiovisual materials
32 Practice Abstracts
The Dutch trans4num site investigates plant-based fertilisation as a circular alternative to animal manure. At the long-term Planty Organic experimental field, legume biomass grown within the crop rotation is harvested and returned to the soil to reduce dependence on external nutrient inputs while maintaining a balanced farm nutrient cycle. Results demonstrate the potential of plant-based fertilisation to improve nutrient circularity, although long-term agronomic and economic performance requires further evaluation.
The need
Specialised organic arable farms without livestock often rely on externally sourced organic manure, which can be scarce and expensive. The Dutch site addresses the need to develop more self-sufficient nutrient management systems for seed potato and arable production while reducing dependence on synthetic fertilisers, animal manure and imported nutrients. Located near vulnerable Natura 2000 areas, the site also seeks to maintain productivity while protecting sensitive ecosystems.
One of the main challenges is synchronising nutrient release from plant biomass with crop demand throughout the growing season. Additional research is needed to assess long-term productivity, land-use efficiency, economic feasibility and scalability under commercial farming conditions.
The benefits
- Reduced dependence on external organic manure through plant-based fertilisation.
- Greater nutrient circularity by recycling nitrogen within crop rotations.
- Decision support through the NDICEA nutrient model.
- New opportunities for specialised arable systems and animal-free fertilisation.
- Strong knowledge exchange through SPNA field trials, advisors and farmer engagement.
- Explore: Netherlands: Integrating nature-based solutions for sustainable nutrie…
- Explore more trans4num Practice Abstracts
Geographical Location
Netherlands
Additional information
trans4num solution
The Dutch site centres on the long-term Planty Organic experiment, where legume biomass is grown within the crop rotation, harvested, stored and reapplied according to crop nutrient requirements using decision-support modelling. Additional trials evaluate plant-based fertiliser pellets in winter wheat, grass-clover fertilisation in organic wheat, and straw- and grass-based mulches to improve crop health and reduce aphid-transmitted virus risks in seed potato production.
The Dutch AKIS brings together SPNA, Wageningen University, farmers and crop advisors to test, monitor and demonstrate NBS. SPNA manages the field experiments while Wageningen University provides scientific monitoring and analysis. Results are shared through field meetings, lectures, webinars, newsletters, videos and hybrid events.
A distinctive feature of the Dutch approach is the active involvement of an experienced crop consultant. Conventional farming recommendations are compared directly with NBS alternatives throughout the growing season, helping translate research findings into practical advisory guidance and increasing the likelihood of farmer adoption.
Challenges / limitations
Plant-based fertilisers require careful timing to match crop nutrient demand. Long-term monitoring is needed to capture climate variability, while successful implementation depends on farmer adaptation, advisory support and additional data collection.
Resources needed
Implementation requires legume biomass production and storage, plant-based fertilisers, nutrient planning tools, soil and crop monitoring, advisory services and continuous farmer knowledge exchange to support wider adoption.
The Dutch trans4num site investigates plant-based fertilisation as a circular alternative to animal manure. At the long-term Planty Organic experimental field, legume biomass grown within the crop rotation is harvested and returned to the soil to reduce dependence on external nutrient inputs while maintaining a balanced farm nutrient cycle. Results demonstrate the potential of plant-based fertilisation to improve nutrient circularity, although long-term agronomic and economic performance requires further evaluation.
The need
Specialised organic arable farms without livestock often rely on externally sourced organic manure, which can be scarce and expensive. The Dutch site addresses the need to develop more self-sufficient nutrient management systems for seed potato and arable production while reducing dependence on synthetic fertilisers, animal manure and imported nutrients. Located near vulnerable Natura 2000 areas, the site also seeks to maintain productivity while protecting sensitive ecosystems.
One of the main challenges is synchronising nutrient release from plant biomass with crop demand throughout the growing season. Additional research is needed to assess long-term productivity, land-use efficiency, economic feasibility and scalability under commercial farming conditions.
The benefits
- Reduced dependence on external organic manure through plant-based fertilisation.
- Greater nutrient circularity by recycling nitrogen within crop rotations.
- Decision support through the NDICEA nutrient model.
- New opportunities for specialised arable systems and animal-free fertilisation.
- Strong knowledge exchange through SPNA field trials, advisors and farmer engagement.
- Explore: Netherlands: Integrating nature-based solutions for sustainable nutrie…
- Explore more trans4num Practice Abstracts
Geographical Location
Netherlands
Additional information
trans4num solution
The Dutch site centres on the long-term Planty Organic experiment, where legume biomass is grown within the crop rotation, harvested, stored and reapplied according to crop nutrient requirements using decision-support modelling. Additional trials evaluate plant-based fertiliser pellets in winter wheat, grass-clover fertilisation in organic wheat, and straw- and grass-based mulches to improve crop health and reduce aphid-transmitted virus risks in seed potato production.
The Dutch AKIS brings together SPNA, Wageningen University, farmers and crop advisors to test, monitor and demonstrate NBS. SPNA manages the field experiments while Wageningen University provides scientific monitoring and analysis. Results are shared through field meetings, lectures, webinars, newsletters, videos and hybrid events.
A distinctive feature of the Dutch approach is the active involvement of an experienced crop consultant. Conventional farming recommendations are compared directly with NBS alternatives throughout the growing season, helping translate research findings into practical advisory guidance and increasing the likelihood of farmer adoption.
Challenges / limitations
Plant-based fertilisers require careful timing to match crop nutrient demand. Long-term monitoring is needed to capture climate variability, while successful implementation depends on farmer adaptation, advisory support and additional data collection.
Resources needed
Implementation requires legume biomass production and storage, plant-based fertilisers, nutrient planning tools, soil and crop monitoring, advisory services and continuous farmer knowledge exchange to support wider adoption.
The UK trans4num site combines recycled fertilisers with long-term farming system experiments to demonstrate Nature-based Solutions (NBS) for sustainable nutrient management. At North Wyke, the recycled phosphorus fertiliser Thallo achieved yields comparable to conventional mineral fertilisers, while the Rothamsted Large-Scale Rotation Experiment (LSRE) evaluates compost, organic amendments, crop rotations, reduced tillage and smart crop protection. Together, the results show that NBS can reduce reliance on mineral fertilisers, improve soil health and support more resilient farming, although successful adoption depends on local conditions and long-term management.
The need
The UK site addresses the need to reduce dependence on conventional mineral fertilisers while maintaining crop productivity under increasingly variable climate conditions. Particular emphasis is placed on phosphorus security, as conventional phosphorus fertilisers rely on rock phosphate resources concentrated in a limited number of geopolitically sensitive regions.
The site also responds to the need for robust, long-term evidence on integrated NBS systems. Farmers require reliable information on how compost, recycled fertilisers, crop rotations, reduced tillage and crop protection influence yields, soil health, pest and disease pressure, labour requirements and profitability before adopting new practices.
The benefits
- Recycled phosphorus fertiliser produced yields equivalent to conventional fertilisers.
- Livestock by-products are recycled, reducing dependence on mined rock phosphate.
- Thallo supplies additional micronutrients, including zinc, manganese and copper.
- Compost and organic amendments improve soil carbon and resilience over time.
- Long-term experiments identify agronomically viable NBS combinations.
- Field trials improve confidence by identifying both opportunities and risks.
- Explore: United Kingdom: Integrating nature-based solutions for sustainable nut…
- Explore more trans4num Practice Abstracts
Geographical Location
United Kingdom
Additional information
trans4num solution
The UK site combines two complementary research platforms. The first is a replicated fertiliser trial at North Wyke comparing Thallo, a recycled phosphorus fertiliser produced from agricultural and abattoir by-products, with conventional mineral fertilisers and an unfertilised control in grass ley and winter wheat.
The second is the Rothamsted Large-Scale Rotation Experiment (LSRE), which evaluates combinations of crop rotation diversity, cultivation intensity, nutrition strategies and crop protection across contrasting soil types. The experiment investigates how compost, cover crops, organic amendments, reduced tillage and smart crop protection interact with soil conditions and climate variability.
The UK AKIS is centred on Rothamsted Research, linking researchers, farmers, advisors, industry, NGOs and policymakers through long-term experiments, field visits, workshops and stakeholder events. Results are translated into practical guidance through trusted advisory channels rather than universal recommendations, recognising that NBS performance depends on farm objectives, soil conditions and climate risks.
Challenges / limitations
Weather extremes, disease pressure and local soil conditions influence NBS performance. Organic amendments require long-term investment, while wider adoption of recycled fertilisers depends on market acceptance, regulatory frameworks and farmer confidence.
Resources needed
Successful implementation requires access to recycled fertilisers, quality standards, monitoring and advisory support, infrastructure for producing and applying organic amendments, long-term field experiments, and collaboration among farmers, advisors, researchers and policymakers.
The UK trans4num site combines recycled fertilisers with long-term farming system experiments to demonstrate Nature-based Solutions (NBS) for sustainable nutrient management. At North Wyke, the recycled phosphorus fertiliser Thallo achieved yields comparable to conventional mineral fertilisers, while the Rothamsted Large-Scale Rotation Experiment (LSRE) evaluates compost, organic amendments, crop rotations, reduced tillage and smart crop protection. Together, the results show that NBS can reduce reliance on mineral fertilisers, improve soil health and support more resilient farming, although successful adoption depends on local conditions and long-term management.
The need
The UK site addresses the need to reduce dependence on conventional mineral fertilisers while maintaining crop productivity under increasingly variable climate conditions. Particular emphasis is placed on phosphorus security, as conventional phosphorus fertilisers rely on rock phosphate resources concentrated in a limited number of geopolitically sensitive regions.
The site also responds to the need for robust, long-term evidence on integrated NBS systems. Farmers require reliable information on how compost, recycled fertilisers, crop rotations, reduced tillage and crop protection influence yields, soil health, pest and disease pressure, labour requirements and profitability before adopting new practices.
The benefits
- Recycled phosphorus fertiliser produced yields equivalent to conventional fertilisers.
- Livestock by-products are recycled, reducing dependence on mined rock phosphate.
- Thallo supplies additional micronutrients, including zinc, manganese and copper.
- Compost and organic amendments improve soil carbon and resilience over time.
- Long-term experiments identify agronomically viable NBS combinations.
- Field trials improve confidence by identifying both opportunities and risks.
- Explore: United Kingdom: Integrating nature-based solutions for sustainable nut…
- Explore more trans4num Practice Abstracts
Geographical Location
United Kingdom
Additional information
trans4num solution
The UK site combines two complementary research platforms. The first is a replicated fertiliser trial at North Wyke comparing Thallo, a recycled phosphorus fertiliser produced from agricultural and abattoir by-products, with conventional mineral fertilisers and an unfertilised control in grass ley and winter wheat.
The second is the Rothamsted Large-Scale Rotation Experiment (LSRE), which evaluates combinations of crop rotation diversity, cultivation intensity, nutrition strategies and crop protection across contrasting soil types. The experiment investigates how compost, cover crops, organic amendments, reduced tillage and smart crop protection interact with soil conditions and climate variability.
The UK AKIS is centred on Rothamsted Research, linking researchers, farmers, advisors, industry, NGOs and policymakers through long-term experiments, field visits, workshops and stakeholder events. Results are translated into practical guidance through trusted advisory channels rather than universal recommendations, recognising that NBS performance depends on farm objectives, soil conditions and climate risks.
Challenges / limitations
Weather extremes, disease pressure and local soil conditions influence NBS performance. Organic amendments require long-term investment, while wider adoption of recycled fertilisers depends on market acceptance, regulatory frameworks and farmer confidence.
Resources needed
Successful implementation requires access to recycled fertilisers, quality standards, monitoring and advisory support, infrastructure for producing and applying organic amendments, long-term field experiments, and collaboration among farmers, advisors, researchers and policymakers.
The Hungarian trans4num site demonstrates how multiple Nature-based Solutions (NBS) can be integrated into a low-input arable farming system. Compared with conventional management, the NBS approach maintained crop nutrient status, improved soil health indicators and reduced CO₂ emissions per unit of yield, particularly for sorghum and durum wheat. While yields varied between crops and seasons, the results demonstrate the potential of NBS to support climate-resilient farming. Long-term monitoring, advisory support and farmer demonstrations are essential for successful adoption.
The need
The Hungarian NBS site addresses the need to make intensive arable production more resilient, lower-input and better suited to the ecologically sensitive Szigetköz region. Located within a productive agricultural landscape that is also part of a Natura 2000 area, the site combines crop production with biodiversity conservation, soil protection and sustainable nutrient management.
The project also responds to a practical adoption gap. Although many NBS are already known, farmers need evidence that they can work together as a complete farming system under commercial conditions. The site therefore evaluates agronomic performance alongside monitoring approaches and decision-support tools that facilitate practical implementation.
The benefits
- Lower CO₂ emissions per unit of yield measured.
- Maintained plant nutrient status with reduced conventional inputs.
- Positive trends in soil organic carbon, organic matter and nitrogen.
- Crop yields maintained, with higher yields recorded for all crops in 2024.
- Site-specific nutrient management supported by soil, leaf, drone, satellite and CO₂ monitoring.
- Greater compatibility between productive farming and biodiversity conservation.
- Explore: Hungary: Integrating nature-based solutions for sustainable nutrient m…
- Explore more trans4num Practice Abstracts
Geographical Location
Hungary
Additional information
trans4num solution
The Hungarian demonstration site consists of a 20-ha commercial field in Kimle comparing Nature-based and conventional farming over a three-year rotation of durum wheat, sorghum and soybean.
The NBS system combines no-tillage, reduced pesticide use, poultry manure pellets, biostimulants, winter cover crops, mulching and integrated crop and soil monitoring. Performance is assessed using soil and leaf analyses, drone and satellite imagery, NDVI, soil profiling and CO₂ measurements.
Rather than evaluating individual practices separately, the trial demonstrates that an integrated NBS system can be successfully implemented under commercial farming conditions while maintaining crop nutrient status and delivering environmental benefits. Monitoring also shows that drone imagery can identify management zones and natural soil variability, supporting more precise nutrient management.
The site's AKIS connects researchers, farmers, advisors, environmental educators and local stakeholders through field demonstrations, workshops and farmer discussions. The main scaling pathway is to translate research findings into practical guidance, advisory recommendations and decision-support tools that help farmers identify where and how NBS can be successfully adopted.
Challenges / limitations
Soil improvements require long-term monitoring, natural variability can mask treatment effects, crop performance depends on seasonal conditions, and reduced pesticide use requires adaptive management. Farmer uptake also depends on confidence in the system's practicality and profitability.
Resources needed
Implementation requires bio-based fertilisers, suitable application equipment, knowledge of no-till and cover crop management, soil, crop and remote-sensing monitoring tools, decision-support systems, farmer training and close collaboration between farmers, advisors and researchers.
The Hungarian trans4num site demonstrates how multiple Nature-based Solutions (NBS) can be integrated into a low-input arable farming system. Compared with conventional management, the NBS approach maintained crop nutrient status, improved soil health indicators and reduced CO₂ emissions per unit of yield, particularly for sorghum and durum wheat. While yields varied between crops and seasons, the results demonstrate the potential of NBS to support climate-resilient farming. Long-term monitoring, advisory support and farmer demonstrations are essential for successful adoption.
The need
The Hungarian NBS site addresses the need to make intensive arable production more resilient, lower-input and better suited to the ecologically sensitive Szigetköz region. Located within a productive agricultural landscape that is also part of a Natura 2000 area, the site combines crop production with biodiversity conservation, soil protection and sustainable nutrient management.
The project also responds to a practical adoption gap. Although many NBS are already known, farmers need evidence that they can work together as a complete farming system under commercial conditions. The site therefore evaluates agronomic performance alongside monitoring approaches and decision-support tools that facilitate practical implementation.
The benefits
- Lower CO₂ emissions per unit of yield measured.
- Maintained plant nutrient status with reduced conventional inputs.
- Positive trends in soil organic carbon, organic matter and nitrogen.
- Crop yields maintained, with higher yields recorded for all crops in 2024.
- Site-specific nutrient management supported by soil, leaf, drone, satellite and CO₂ monitoring.
- Greater compatibility between productive farming and biodiversity conservation.
- Explore: Hungary: Integrating nature-based solutions for sustainable nutrient m…
- Explore more trans4num Practice Abstracts
Geographical Location
Hungary
Additional information
trans4num solution
The Hungarian demonstration site consists of a 20-ha commercial field in Kimle comparing Nature-based and conventional farming over a three-year rotation of durum wheat, sorghum and soybean.
The NBS system combines no-tillage, reduced pesticide use, poultry manure pellets, biostimulants, winter cover crops, mulching and integrated crop and soil monitoring. Performance is assessed using soil and leaf analyses, drone and satellite imagery, NDVI, soil profiling and CO₂ measurements.
Rather than evaluating individual practices separately, the trial demonstrates that an integrated NBS system can be successfully implemented under commercial farming conditions while maintaining crop nutrient status and delivering environmental benefits. Monitoring also shows that drone imagery can identify management zones and natural soil variability, supporting more precise nutrient management.
The site's AKIS connects researchers, farmers, advisors, environmental educators and local stakeholders through field demonstrations, workshops and farmer discussions. The main scaling pathway is to translate research findings into practical guidance, advisory recommendations and decision-support tools that help farmers identify where and how NBS can be successfully adopted.
Challenges / limitations
Soil improvements require long-term monitoring, natural variability can mask treatment effects, crop performance depends on seasonal conditions, and reduced pesticide use requires adaptive management. Farmer uptake also depends on confidence in the system's practicality and profitability.
Resources needed
Implementation requires bio-based fertilisers, suitable application equipment, knowledge of no-till and cover crop management, soil, crop and remote-sensing monitoring tools, decision-support systems, farmer training and close collaboration between farmers, advisors and researchers.
Successful Nature-based Solutions (NBS) depend not only on innovative technologies but also on the people and organisations that support them. The trans4num project found that innovations are more likely to move beyond pilot projects when farmers, advisors, researchers, businesses and policymakers collaborate over time. Strong Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems (AKIS), stable funding and continuous knowledge exchange help adapt innovations to local conditions and support their long-term uptake, while fragmented networks and short-term support limit wider adoption.
The need
Many promising NBS remain in early development because they lack strong networks connecting farmers, advisors, businesses and policymakers. Across Europe, weak coordination, missing actors and fragmented funding slow innovation and prevent solutions from becoming part of everyday farming practice.
The benefits
Well-functioning advisory and innovation networks improve farmers' access to practical knowledge, reduce risks and encourage the adoption of new practices. Strong cooperation between actors increases the likelihood that innovations are adapted to local conditions, become economically viable and receive long-term support from policy and markets.
- Explore: Scaling nature-based solutions through strong networks
- Explore more trans4num Practice Abstracts
Geographical Location
Denmark, Germany, Hungary, Netherlands, United Kingdom, Switzerland
Additional information
trans4num findings
trans4num showed that successful innovation depends as much on cooperation as on technology. Country examples highlighted different AKIS approaches:
• Denmark: Long-term cooperation between farmers, advisors, researchers and industry, supported by stable funding, enabled innovations such as green biorefineries to move beyond pilot projects.
• Netherlands: Farmer-led networks drove innovation, but limited formal support reduced long-term stability.
• Hungary: Top-down advisory systems and uneven access to knowledge limited farmer participation.
• United Kingdom: Product innovations developed by companies and researchers struggled to move beyond demonstration sites.
Farmers were more willing to test NBS when involved through co-design, testing and feedback. Trusted advisors translated research into practice, while strong networks, stable funding and broad stakeholder involvement enabled wider uptake. Diverse networks alone were insufficient when links between actors were weak.
Challenges / limitations
Missing key actors, weak coordination between policy, research and practice, fragmented funding and limited communication slowed innovation and reduced adoption.
Resources needed & policy recommendations
Successful implementation requires trusted advisory systems, inclusive networks, stable long-term funding, regular knowledge exchange through demonstration farms and peer learning, and coordination between science, policy and practice. AKIS should be supported by trusted innovation intermediaries rather than managed as a formal structure. The Danish experience highlights the value of regional multi-actor platforms, while the most appropriate coordination model should reflect the innovation, its development stage and the local institutional context.
Successful Nature-based Solutions (NBS) depend not only on innovative technologies but also on the people and organisations that support them. The trans4num project found that innovations are more likely to move beyond pilot projects when farmers, advisors, researchers, businesses and policymakers collaborate over time. Strong Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems (AKIS), stable funding and continuous knowledge exchange help adapt innovations to local conditions and support their long-term uptake, while fragmented networks and short-term support limit wider adoption.
The need
Many promising NBS remain in early development because they lack strong networks connecting farmers, advisors, businesses and policymakers. Across Europe, weak coordination, missing actors and fragmented funding slow innovation and prevent solutions from becoming part of everyday farming practice.
The benefits
Well-functioning advisory and innovation networks improve farmers' access to practical knowledge, reduce risks and encourage the adoption of new practices. Strong cooperation between actors increases the likelihood that innovations are adapted to local conditions, become economically viable and receive long-term support from policy and markets.
- Explore: Scaling nature-based solutions through strong networks
- Explore more trans4num Practice Abstracts
Geographical Location
Denmark, Germany, Hungary, Netherlands, United Kingdom, Switzerland
Additional information
trans4num findings
trans4num showed that successful innovation depends as much on cooperation as on technology. Country examples highlighted different AKIS approaches:
• Denmark: Long-term cooperation between farmers, advisors, researchers and industry, supported by stable funding, enabled innovations such as green biorefineries to move beyond pilot projects.
• Netherlands: Farmer-led networks drove innovation, but limited formal support reduced long-term stability.
• Hungary: Top-down advisory systems and uneven access to knowledge limited farmer participation.
• United Kingdom: Product innovations developed by companies and researchers struggled to move beyond demonstration sites.
Farmers were more willing to test NBS when involved through co-design, testing and feedback. Trusted advisors translated research into practice, while strong networks, stable funding and broad stakeholder involvement enabled wider uptake. Diverse networks alone were insufficient when links between actors were weak.
Challenges / limitations
Missing key actors, weak coordination between policy, research and practice, fragmented funding and limited communication slowed innovation and reduced adoption.
Resources needed & policy recommendations
Successful implementation requires trusted advisory systems, inclusive networks, stable long-term funding, regular knowledge exchange through demonstration farms and peer learning, and coordination between science, policy and practice. AKIS should be supported by trusted innovation intermediaries rather than managed as a formal structure. The Danish experience highlights the value of regional multi-actor platforms, while the most appropriate coordination model should reflect the innovation, its development stage and the local institutional context.
Nature-based Solutions (NBS) require farmers and policymakers to balance environmental, economic and social trade-offs. Within trans4num, a suite of complementary modelling tools was developed to explore future scenarios before actions are implemented. By combining Decision Support Tools (DST), Agent-Based Models (ABM) and Food System Models (FSM), stakeholders can assess the impacts of management practices and policy options, reducing uncertainty and supporting evidence-based decision-making.
The need
Farmers and policymakers need practical tools to plan the transition to more sustainable agriculture. Decisions on NBS involve trade-offs between productivity, environmental performance and costs, yet many existing models are either too technical or poorly adapted to real-world decision-making. There is therefore a need for models that reflect conditions across the entire value chain while remaining simple, transparent and easy to interpret.
The benefits
Well-designed modelling tools allow stakeholders to test alternative scenarios before implementation, reducing risks and improving decision-making. They support better targeted policies, more effective incentives and wider adoption of sustainable practices by answering practical questions such as:
- What happens if new nitrogen policies are introduced?
- What if nature-based solutions are scaled up?
- What are the trade-offs between production, environmental performance and costs?
Early applications, including the Danish ABM prototype, demonstrated the ability to assess farmer behaviour, profitability and environmental outcomes. Stakeholder feedback also highlighted that models must remain transparent and understandable to avoid being perceived as "black boxes".
- Explore: Using modelling tools to support better farming and policy decisions
- Explore more trans4num Practice Abstracts
Geographical Location
Denmark, Hungary, Netherlands, Switzerland, The United Kingdom
Additional information
trans4num solution
trans4num developed three complementary modelling approaches to support decision-making at different scales:
- Decision Support Tool (DST): optimises the spatial allocation of NBS to reduce environmental impacts, improve ecological performance and maintain agricultural productivity while balancing economic constraints.
- Agent-Based Models (ABM): simulate farmer decision-making by considering production costs, social interactions and policy incentives.
- Food System Models (FSM): evaluate how changes in farming, commodity processing and resource use affect food production, nutrient flows and environmental performance at regional and national levels.
The tools were co-developed and tested with farmers, advisors, policymakers and researchers to ensure they remain relevant, understandable and practical. They support "what-if" analyses before policies or investments are implemented and facilitate dialogue between stakeholders by reflecting real farming conditions, policy objectives and practical constraints.
Challenges / limitations
Models can be difficult to understand without expert support, results may be questioned if tools appear as "black boxes", differences between research and policy timelines can limit uptake, and limited data, incentives or supportive policies may reduce practical impact.
Resources needed
Successful implementation requires skilled facilitators, early stakeholder involvement, reliable local and national datasets, balanced investment in research, capacity building and stakeholder engagement, and intermediary organisations that connect science, policy and practice. Co-design with end users is essential to ensure modelling tools answer relevant questions and support informed, evidence-based decisions.
Nature-based Solutions (NBS) require farmers and policymakers to balance environmental, economic and social trade-offs. Within trans4num, a suite of complementary modelling tools was developed to explore future scenarios before actions are implemented. By combining Decision Support Tools (DST), Agent-Based Models (ABM) and Food System Models (FSM), stakeholders can assess the impacts of management practices and policy options, reducing uncertainty and supporting evidence-based decision-making.
The need
Farmers and policymakers need practical tools to plan the transition to more sustainable agriculture. Decisions on NBS involve trade-offs between productivity, environmental performance and costs, yet many existing models are either too technical or poorly adapted to real-world decision-making. There is therefore a need for models that reflect conditions across the entire value chain while remaining simple, transparent and easy to interpret.
The benefits
Well-designed modelling tools allow stakeholders to test alternative scenarios before implementation, reducing risks and improving decision-making. They support better targeted policies, more effective incentives and wider adoption of sustainable practices by answering practical questions such as:
- What happens if new nitrogen policies are introduced?
- What if nature-based solutions are scaled up?
- What are the trade-offs between production, environmental performance and costs?
Early applications, including the Danish ABM prototype, demonstrated the ability to assess farmer behaviour, profitability and environmental outcomes. Stakeholder feedback also highlighted that models must remain transparent and understandable to avoid being perceived as "black boxes".
- Explore: Using modelling tools to support better farming and policy decisions
- Explore more trans4num Practice Abstracts
Geographical Location
Denmark, Hungary, Netherlands, Switzerland, The United Kingdom
Additional information
trans4num solution
trans4num developed three complementary modelling approaches to support decision-making at different scales:
- Decision Support Tool (DST): optimises the spatial allocation of NBS to reduce environmental impacts, improve ecological performance and maintain agricultural productivity while balancing economic constraints.
- Agent-Based Models (ABM): simulate farmer decision-making by considering production costs, social interactions and policy incentives.
- Food System Models (FSM): evaluate how changes in farming, commodity processing and resource use affect food production, nutrient flows and environmental performance at regional and national levels.
The tools were co-developed and tested with farmers, advisors, policymakers and researchers to ensure they remain relevant, understandable and practical. They support "what-if" analyses before policies or investments are implemented and facilitate dialogue between stakeholders by reflecting real farming conditions, policy objectives and practical constraints.
Challenges / limitations
Models can be difficult to understand without expert support, results may be questioned if tools appear as "black boxes", differences between research and policy timelines can limit uptake, and limited data, incentives or supportive policies may reduce practical impact.
Resources needed
Successful implementation requires skilled facilitators, early stakeholder involvement, reliable local and national datasets, balanced investment in research, capacity building and stakeholder engagement, and intermediary organisations that connect science, policy and practice. Co-design with end users is essential to ensure modelling tools answer relevant questions and support informed, evidence-based decisions.
Millions of tonnes of crop residues are produced annually in China, yet much of this biomass remains underutilised. Within the trans4num project, an innovative grain–mushroom rotation system was developed that converts wheat and maize straw into valuable mushroom products while improving soil fertility, increasing crop yields and creating new income opportunities. The system demonstrates how circular agriculture can generate both environmental and economic benefits.
The need
Agricultural systems in the Henan region face declining soil organic matter, poor utilisation of crop residues, inefficient nutrient cycling, environmental impacts from residue management and increasing pressure to improve productivity sustainably. Converting agricultural by-products into valuable resources offers an opportunity to restore soil health while strengthening farm resilience.
The benefits
For farmers
- Additional income from mushroom production.
- Higher grain yields.
- Improved soil fertility.
- Reduced weed pressure.
For the environment
- Increased soil organic matter.
- Enhanced carbon sequestration.
- Improved nutrient recycling.
- Reduced greenhouse gas emissions.
For rural development
- New value chains and business opportunities.
- Better utilisation of agricultural by-products.
- Increased resource efficiency.
- Explore: Straw-based crop–mushroom systems for circular nutrient use and soil r…
- Explore more trans4num Practice Abstracts
Geographical Location
China
Additional information
trans4num solution
trans4num China developed a fixed-plot grain–mushroom rotation system in which wheat and maize straw are used as mushroom substrate, mushrooms are cultivated as a high-value crop, spent mushroom substrate is returned to the fields, and grain and mushroom production rotate across plots. This circular approach transforms crop residues into valuable biological resources while improving soil quality and nutrient cycling.
The system delivered substantial benefits, including approximately 23.5% higher wheat yields, more than 60% increases in soil organic matter, over 40% higher available nutrient levels, weed reductions exceeding 90%, improved root development, photosynthetic efficiency and water-use efficiency, increased carbon sequestration, and economic returns of up to €18,000/ha.
AKIS system
The innovation brings together research institutes, agricultural universities, demonstration farms, technology developers and machinery manufacturers. Wider scaling will require stronger collaboration with farmers, cooperatives, mushroom producers, processors and local authorities.
Challenges / limitations
The system is more complex than conventional crop production, requires specialised knowledge and initial investment, and depends on the development of viable mushroom markets.
Resources needed & scaling
Successful implementation requires mushroom inoculum and cultivation materials, residue-handling equipment, technical training, advisory and extension services, and reliable market access. Wider adoption would benefit from farmer training, advisory support on substrate management, stronger mushroom value chains, incentives promoting residue valorisation and broader support for circular agriculture initiatives. Grain–mushroom rotations demonstrate how crop residues can become valuable resources that improve soil fertility, increase farm income and contribute to more sustainable food production.
Millions of tonnes of crop residues are produced annually in China, yet much of this biomass remains underutilised. Within the trans4num project, an innovative grain–mushroom rotation system was developed that converts wheat and maize straw into valuable mushroom products while improving soil fertility, increasing crop yields and creating new income opportunities. The system demonstrates how circular agriculture can generate both environmental and economic benefits.
The need
Agricultural systems in the Henan region face declining soil organic matter, poor utilisation of crop residues, inefficient nutrient cycling, environmental impacts from residue management and increasing pressure to improve productivity sustainably. Converting agricultural by-products into valuable resources offers an opportunity to restore soil health while strengthening farm resilience.
The benefits
For farmers
- Additional income from mushroom production.
- Higher grain yields.
- Improved soil fertility.
- Reduced weed pressure.
For the environment
- Increased soil organic matter.
- Enhanced carbon sequestration.
- Improved nutrient recycling.
- Reduced greenhouse gas emissions.
For rural development
- New value chains and business opportunities.
- Better utilisation of agricultural by-products.
- Increased resource efficiency.
- Explore: Straw-based crop–mushroom systems for circular nutrient use and soil r…
- Explore more trans4num Practice Abstracts
Geographical Location
China
Additional information
trans4num solution
trans4num China developed a fixed-plot grain–mushroom rotation system in which wheat and maize straw are used as mushroom substrate, mushrooms are cultivated as a high-value crop, spent mushroom substrate is returned to the fields, and grain and mushroom production rotate across plots. This circular approach transforms crop residues into valuable biological resources while improving soil quality and nutrient cycling.
The system delivered substantial benefits, including approximately 23.5% higher wheat yields, more than 60% increases in soil organic matter, over 40% higher available nutrient levels, weed reductions exceeding 90%, improved root development, photosynthetic efficiency and water-use efficiency, increased carbon sequestration, and economic returns of up to €18,000/ha.
AKIS system
The innovation brings together research institutes, agricultural universities, demonstration farms, technology developers and machinery manufacturers. Wider scaling will require stronger collaboration with farmers, cooperatives, mushroom producers, processors and local authorities.
Challenges / limitations
The system is more complex than conventional crop production, requires specialised knowledge and initial investment, and depends on the development of viable mushroom markets.
Resources needed & scaling
Successful implementation requires mushroom inoculum and cultivation materials, residue-handling equipment, technical training, advisory and extension services, and reliable market access. Wider adoption would benefit from farmer training, advisory support on substrate management, stronger mushroom value chains, incentives promoting residue valorisation and broader support for circular agriculture initiatives. Grain–mushroom rotations demonstrate how crop residues can become valuable resources that improve soil fertility, increase farm income and contribute to more sustainable food production.
Intensive vegetable and maize production systems in China often rely heavily on synthetic fertilisers, contributing to soil degradation, nutrient losses and declining soil carbon. Within the trans4num project, different organic nutrient management strategies were tested to partially replace chemical fertilisers with locally available organic resources. Results show that fertiliser use can be substantially reduced while maintaining crop yields and improving soil health.
The need
Farmers require sustainable nutrient management approaches that reduce dependence on mineral fertilisers, improve soil fertility and soil carbon stocks, minimise nutrient losses to the environment, maintain crop productivity and strengthen the long-term resilience of farming systems.
The benefits
For farmers
- Lower fertiliser requirements.
- Improved nutrient-use efficiency.
- Stable crop yields.
- Improved soil fertility.
For the environment
- Increased carbon sequestration.
- Reduced nitrogen losses.
- Improved soil structure.
- Better nutrient cycling.
For society
- Greater recycling of agricultural and food waste.
- Reduced dependence on external fertiliser inputs.
- More sustainable food production systems.
- Explore: Organic fertiliser substitution to improve soil carbon and nutrient ef…
- Explore more trans4num Practice Abstracts
Geographical Location
China
Additional information
trans4num solution
The project tested partial substitution of chemical fertilisers in South-West China using biochar, chicken manure, food-waste-derived fertiliser and straw incorporation. In maize systems, these organic amendments were combined with controlled-release fertilisers and improved nutrient management strategies.
Results (Y1–Y3) demonstrated significant improvements in soil carbon stability, soil aggregation and structure. Maize yields were maintained despite a 37.5% reduction in nitrogen inputs, while nitrogen surpluses were reduced by 75–77% and nitrogen-use efficiency increased. Long-term straw incorporation enhanced soil organic carbon, and biochar delivered particularly strong improvements in carbon retention.
AKIS system
The innovation is supported by a research-led AKIS involving Southwest University, regional experimental stations, long-term field trials and research-based advisory activities. While knowledge exchange is currently driven mainly by research institutions, there is considerable potential to strengthen farmer participation and extension services.
Challenges / limitations
Organic materials differ in nutrient content and performance, nutrients are released more slowly than from mineral fertilisers, and poor nutrient management can lead to imbalances.
Resources needed & scaling
Implementation requires reliable organic amendment supply chains, soil testing and nutrient budgeting tools, technical advisory support and monitoring systems. Wider adoption would benefit from nutrient management advisory services, farmer training, stronger support for circular nutrient systems, policies encouraging recycling of organic waste streams, and the development of local supply chains for organic fertilisers. Organic fertiliser substitution can maintain yields while substantially reducing fertiliser inputs and improving long-term soil health.
Intensive vegetable and maize production systems in China often rely heavily on synthetic fertilisers, contributing to soil degradation, nutrient losses and declining soil carbon. Within the trans4num project, different organic nutrient management strategies were tested to partially replace chemical fertilisers with locally available organic resources. Results show that fertiliser use can be substantially reduced while maintaining crop yields and improving soil health.
The need
Farmers require sustainable nutrient management approaches that reduce dependence on mineral fertilisers, improve soil fertility and soil carbon stocks, minimise nutrient losses to the environment, maintain crop productivity and strengthen the long-term resilience of farming systems.
The benefits
For farmers
- Lower fertiliser requirements.
- Improved nutrient-use efficiency.
- Stable crop yields.
- Improved soil fertility.
For the environment
- Increased carbon sequestration.
- Reduced nitrogen losses.
- Improved soil structure.
- Better nutrient cycling.
For society
- Greater recycling of agricultural and food waste.
- Reduced dependence on external fertiliser inputs.
- More sustainable food production systems.
- Explore: Organic fertiliser substitution to improve soil carbon and nutrient ef…
- Explore more trans4num Practice Abstracts
Geographical Location
China
Additional information
trans4num solution
The project tested partial substitution of chemical fertilisers in South-West China using biochar, chicken manure, food-waste-derived fertiliser and straw incorporation. In maize systems, these organic amendments were combined with controlled-release fertilisers and improved nutrient management strategies.
Results (Y1–Y3) demonstrated significant improvements in soil carbon stability, soil aggregation and structure. Maize yields were maintained despite a 37.5% reduction in nitrogen inputs, while nitrogen surpluses were reduced by 75–77% and nitrogen-use efficiency increased. Long-term straw incorporation enhanced soil organic carbon, and biochar delivered particularly strong improvements in carbon retention.
AKIS system
The innovation is supported by a research-led AKIS involving Southwest University, regional experimental stations, long-term field trials and research-based advisory activities. While knowledge exchange is currently driven mainly by research institutions, there is considerable potential to strengthen farmer participation and extension services.
Challenges / limitations
Organic materials differ in nutrient content and performance, nutrients are released more slowly than from mineral fertilisers, and poor nutrient management can lead to imbalances.
Resources needed & scaling
Implementation requires reliable organic amendment supply chains, soil testing and nutrient budgeting tools, technical advisory support and monitoring systems. Wider adoption would benefit from nutrient management advisory services, farmer training, stronger support for circular nutrient systems, policies encouraging recycling of organic waste streams, and the development of local supply chains for organic fertilisers. Organic fertiliser substitution can maintain yields while substantially reducing fertiliser inputs and improving long-term soil health.
Soybean production in Northeast China is increasingly affected by soil degradation, moisture loss, rising production costs and climate variability. Conventional tillage disturbs soil structure, accelerates moisture loss and increases labour requirements. Within the trans4num project, conservation agriculture approaches were tested to reduce soil disturbance while maintaining productivity. Results show that no-tillage systems can improve crop establishment, lower production costs and support more resilient soybean production.
The need
Soybean growers face several challenges, including reduced soil moisture during crop establishment, increasing costs linked to intensive tillage, weed pressure, unstable crop emergence, soil degradation caused by repeated soil disturbance, and the need to maintain yields while reducing environmental impacts.
The benefits
For farmers
- Lower fuel, labour and machinery costs.
- Improved crop establishment.
- Higher yield potential.
- Fewer tillage operations.
For the environment
- Better soil moisture conservation.
- Reduced soil disturbance and erosion risk.
- Improved soil biological activity.
- More efficient use of resources.
For advisors and policymakers
- A practical pathway towards conservation agriculture.
- Lower environmental footprint without sacrificing productivity.
- A scalable solution for large soybean-growing regions.
- Explore: No-tillage soybean systems for improved soil moisture and yield stabil…
- Explore more trans4num Practice Abstracts
Geographical Location
China
Additional information
trans4num solution
The project compared four soybean production systems: no-tillage with row-specific seeding (NTRS), strip tillage (STRS), deep tillage (DTRS) and conventional ridge tillage (RTR). The NTRS system combines direct seeding with minimal soil disturbance while leaving crop residues on the soil surface to conserve moisture, regulate soil temperature and protect soil structure.
Results (Y1–Y3) showed that NTRS increased soil temperature and moisture during early crop development, improved emergence rates by 2.7–4.7%, accelerated emergence and crop uniformity, reduced weed dominance and improved weed management timing, increased pod numbers and yield potential, lowered labour requirements and production costs, and improved profitability compared with conventional systems.
AKIS system
The innovation is supported by a research-led AKIS involving the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), regional research institutes, experimental stations, demonstration fields and farmer outreach activities. Knowledge generation is currently led by research organisations, with increasing emphasis on farmer engagement and practical demonstrations.
Challenges / limitations
Adoption may be slow where conventional tillage is well established, performance depends on local soil conditions, and farmers may perceive greater risks during the transition.
Resources needed & scaling
Implementation requires specialised no-tillage machinery, advisory support, long-term monitoring, farmer training and demonstration activities. Wider adoption would benefit from technical guidance, improved access to suitable seeding equipment, demonstration farms, peer-to-peer learning and incentives supporting reduced-tillage practices. Simple changes in tillage can improve soil conditions, increase profitability and strengthen climate resilience while reducing production costs.
Soybean production in Northeast China is increasingly affected by soil degradation, moisture loss, rising production costs and climate variability. Conventional tillage disturbs soil structure, accelerates moisture loss and increases labour requirements. Within the trans4num project, conservation agriculture approaches were tested to reduce soil disturbance while maintaining productivity. Results show that no-tillage systems can improve crop establishment, lower production costs and support more resilient soybean production.
The need
Soybean growers face several challenges, including reduced soil moisture during crop establishment, increasing costs linked to intensive tillage, weed pressure, unstable crop emergence, soil degradation caused by repeated soil disturbance, and the need to maintain yields while reducing environmental impacts.
The benefits
For farmers
- Lower fuel, labour and machinery costs.
- Improved crop establishment.
- Higher yield potential.
- Fewer tillage operations.
For the environment
- Better soil moisture conservation.
- Reduced soil disturbance and erosion risk.
- Improved soil biological activity.
- More efficient use of resources.
For advisors and policymakers
- A practical pathway towards conservation agriculture.
- Lower environmental footprint without sacrificing productivity.
- A scalable solution for large soybean-growing regions.
- Explore: No-tillage soybean systems for improved soil moisture and yield stabil…
- Explore more trans4num Practice Abstracts
Geographical Location
China
Additional information
trans4num solution
The project compared four soybean production systems: no-tillage with row-specific seeding (NTRS), strip tillage (STRS), deep tillage (DTRS) and conventional ridge tillage (RTR). The NTRS system combines direct seeding with minimal soil disturbance while leaving crop residues on the soil surface to conserve moisture, regulate soil temperature and protect soil structure.
Results (Y1–Y3) showed that NTRS increased soil temperature and moisture during early crop development, improved emergence rates by 2.7–4.7%, accelerated emergence and crop uniformity, reduced weed dominance and improved weed management timing, increased pod numbers and yield potential, lowered labour requirements and production costs, and improved profitability compared with conventional systems.
AKIS system
The innovation is supported by a research-led AKIS involving the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), regional research institutes, experimental stations, demonstration fields and farmer outreach activities. Knowledge generation is currently led by research organisations, with increasing emphasis on farmer engagement and practical demonstrations.
Challenges / limitations
Adoption may be slow where conventional tillage is well established, performance depends on local soil conditions, and farmers may perceive greater risks during the transition.
Resources needed & scaling
Implementation requires specialised no-tillage machinery, advisory support, long-term monitoring, farmer training and demonstration activities. Wider adoption would benefit from technical guidance, improved access to suitable seeding equipment, demonstration farms, peer-to-peer learning and incentives supporting reduced-tillage practices. Simple changes in tillage can improve soil conditions, increase profitability and strengthen climate resilience while reducing production costs.
Climate change, soil degradation and water scarcity are placing increasing pressure on European agriculture. Although nature-based solutions (NBS) such as cover cropping, reduced tillage and organic soil regeneration are widely promoted, farmers often struggle to detect early signs of soil and crop stress. The Soil & Plant Monitoring approach developed within trans4num makes soil and crop conditions measurable through field observations, monitoring tools and data-driven methods, helping farmers optimise resource use and implement NBS more effectively.
The need
Many soil degradation processes (including compaction, reduced water retention, nutrient imbalance and declining biological activity) develop gradually and remain invisible until crop performance has already declined. Climate extremes such as prolonged drought and irregular rainfall further increase pressure on soils and crops. Reliance on visual observations alone often results in delayed interventions and inefficient use of water and fertilisers, while natural variability within fields complicates management decisions.
Practical field-level monitoring is therefore essential to support early decision-making, adapt NBS to local conditions, verify field trial results and guide nutrient management throughout the growing season.
The benefits
The monitoring approach:
- Detects soil and crop stress early.
- Improves water and nutrient management.
- Reduces unnecessary fertiliser and irrigation inputs.
- Supports implementation of NBS and soil regeneration.
- Improves understanding of soil variability.
- Strengthens climate resilience.
- Enables data-driven farm management by combining field observations with digital technologies.
- Explore: Monitoring-supported decision-making for effective nature-based soluti…
- Explore more trans4num Practice Abstracts
Geographical Location
Hungary
Additional information
trans4num solution
The Soil & Plant Monitoring approach combines field observations with digital and sensor-based technologies to better understand soil–plant interactions and support climate-resilient agriculture.
Soil monitoring measures moisture, temperature, structure, organic matter and nutrient availability while soil profile investigations reveal root-zone conditions, stratification and water movement that cannot be observed from the surface. Plant monitoring evaluates crop vitality, leaf colour, biomass and vegetation indices to detect early drought, nutrient or soil-related stress. Leaf analyses, drone imagery and multispectral observations reveal spatial variability and support site-specific nutrient management.
Together, these monitoring systems optimise NBS such as cover cropping, mulching, compost application and reduced tillage by adapting practices to local soil conditions and crop requirements. Monitoring therefore becomes both a performance assessment tool and a decision-support system for regenerative agriculture.
Challenges / limitations
Implementation is constrained by limited operational windows, the availability and interpretation of real-time data, and the complexity of integrating sensor, drone, laboratory and field observations into practical management decisions.
Resources needed
Successful implementation requires soil and leaf analyses, in-field sensors, drone and satellite observations, digital decision-support tools, advisory support and farmer experience to interpret results and adapt regenerative practices.
Practical recommendations
Carry out continuous monitoring throughout the growing season, align nutrient applications with crop demand, combine field observations with remote sensing, use soil and leaf analyses to guide fertilisation, and adapt tillage and NBS to local soil conditions. Closer integration of monitoring, improved DST and stronger advisory networks will support wider adoption of site-specific, climate-resilient agriculture.
Climate change, soil degradation and water scarcity are placing increasing pressure on European agriculture. Although nature-based solutions (NBS) such as cover cropping, reduced tillage and organic soil regeneration are widely promoted, farmers often struggle to detect early signs of soil and crop stress. The Soil & Plant Monitoring approach developed within trans4num makes soil and crop conditions measurable through field observations, monitoring tools and data-driven methods, helping farmers optimise resource use and implement NBS more effectively.
The need
Many soil degradation processes (including compaction, reduced water retention, nutrient imbalance and declining biological activity) develop gradually and remain invisible until crop performance has already declined. Climate extremes such as prolonged drought and irregular rainfall further increase pressure on soils and crops. Reliance on visual observations alone often results in delayed interventions and inefficient use of water and fertilisers, while natural variability within fields complicates management decisions.
Practical field-level monitoring is therefore essential to support early decision-making, adapt NBS to local conditions, verify field trial results and guide nutrient management throughout the growing season.
The benefits
The monitoring approach:
- Detects soil and crop stress early.
- Improves water and nutrient management.
- Reduces unnecessary fertiliser and irrigation inputs.
- Supports implementation of NBS and soil regeneration.
- Improves understanding of soil variability.
- Strengthens climate resilience.
- Enables data-driven farm management by combining field observations with digital technologies.
- Explore: Monitoring-supported decision-making for effective nature-based soluti…
- Explore more trans4num Practice Abstracts
Geographical Location
Hungary
Additional information
trans4num solution
The Soil & Plant Monitoring approach combines field observations with digital and sensor-based technologies to better understand soil–plant interactions and support climate-resilient agriculture.
Soil monitoring measures moisture, temperature, structure, organic matter and nutrient availability while soil profile investigations reveal root-zone conditions, stratification and water movement that cannot be observed from the surface. Plant monitoring evaluates crop vitality, leaf colour, biomass and vegetation indices to detect early drought, nutrient or soil-related stress. Leaf analyses, drone imagery and multispectral observations reveal spatial variability and support site-specific nutrient management.
Together, these monitoring systems optimise NBS such as cover cropping, mulching, compost application and reduced tillage by adapting practices to local soil conditions and crop requirements. Monitoring therefore becomes both a performance assessment tool and a decision-support system for regenerative agriculture.
Challenges / limitations
Implementation is constrained by limited operational windows, the availability and interpretation of real-time data, and the complexity of integrating sensor, drone, laboratory and field observations into practical management decisions.
Resources needed
Successful implementation requires soil and leaf analyses, in-field sensors, drone and satellite observations, digital decision-support tools, advisory support and farmer experience to interpret results and adapt regenerative practices.
Practical recommendations
Carry out continuous monitoring throughout the growing season, align nutrient applications with crop demand, combine field observations with remote sensing, use soil and leaf analyses to guide fertilisation, and adapt tillage and NBS to local soil conditions. Closer integration of monitoring, improved DST and stronger advisory networks will support wider adoption of site-specific, climate-resilient agriculture.
Soil processes are largely invisible, making it difficult for farmers to assess whether sustainable practices improve soil health. Within the trans4num project, soil CO₂ emission monitoring was tested as a practical tool to evaluate the effects of nature-based solutions (NBS) on soil biological activity, nutrient cycling and carbon efficiency. Combined with soil, plant and drone monitoring, CO₂ measurements help farmers make more informed decisions and better understand how management practices influence long-term soil resilience.
The need
Many soil degradation processes develop gradually and remain unnoticed until crop performance declines. Reduced biological activity, poor soil structure, lower water retention and inefficient nutrient cycling cannot easily be detected through visual observation alone. Farmers therefore need practical monitoring tools that provide early information on soil functioning and help evaluate whether NBS deliver environmental benefits. These challenges are particularly relevant in Hungary's Szigetköz region, where agricultural production is affected by changing groundwater conditions, drought risk and strong natural soil variability.
The benefits
Soil CO₂ monitoring:
- Makes below-ground biological activity visible.
- Assesses whether NBS improve soil functioning.
- Supports more precise nutrient management.
- Links climate mitigation with everyday farm management.
- Identifies spatial and temporal variability within fields.
- Strengthens advisory services, demonstration activities and farmer learning.
- Supports long-term monitoring of regenerative agricultural practices.
Geographical Location
Hungary
Additional information
trans4num solution
Within the trans4num project, soil CO₂ emission monitoring was integrated into a nature-based farming system tested in Kimle, Hungary, comparing NBS with conventional management across a three-year rotation of durum wheat, sorghum and soybean. The NBS system combined crop rotation, no-tillage, reduced herbicide and pesticide use, poultry manure pellets, biostimulants, winter cover crops and continuous crop and soil monitoring.
CO₂ emissions were measured using a portable closed-chamber system alongside soil sampling, plant nutrient analyses, soil profile observations, drone monitoring and satellite imagery. Because a single CO₂ value cannot determine whether soil is gaining or losing carbon, all measurements were interpreted together.
Across all three crops, NBS consistently produced equal or lower CO₂ emissions per unit of harvested yield than conventional systems, with significant reductions for sorghum and durum wheat. Carbon efficiency improved while maintaining comparable yields, demonstrating the climate mitigation potential of NBS. Long-term monitoring also showed gradual improvements in soil organic carbon, organic matter, nitrogen cycling and biological activity, particularly within the upper 0–30 cm of soil.
Challenges / limitations
CO₂ emissions vary with season, temperature, soil moisture and recent field operations. Natural field variability can mask treatment effects, making repeated, long-term measurements essential.
Resources needed
Implementation requires portable CO₂ sensors, closed-chamber systems, soil moisture and temperature measurements, drone and satellite monitoring, farmer training, advisory support and consistent multi-year monitoring protocols.
Practical recommendations
Measure CO₂ repeatedly during the growing season, record weather and management conditions, compare treatments under similar conditions, & always interpret CO₂ measurements together with soil, plant and remote-sensing data rather than as a stand-alone indicator.
Soil processes are largely invisible, making it difficult for farmers to assess whether sustainable practices improve soil health. Within the trans4num project, soil CO₂ emission monitoring was tested as a practical tool to evaluate the effects of nature-based solutions (NBS) on soil biological activity, nutrient cycling and carbon efficiency. Combined with soil, plant and drone monitoring, CO₂ measurements help farmers make more informed decisions and better understand how management practices influence long-term soil resilience.
The need
Many soil degradation processes develop gradually and remain unnoticed until crop performance declines. Reduced biological activity, poor soil structure, lower water retention and inefficient nutrient cycling cannot easily be detected through visual observation alone. Farmers therefore need practical monitoring tools that provide early information on soil functioning and help evaluate whether NBS deliver environmental benefits. These challenges are particularly relevant in Hungary's Szigetköz region, where agricultural production is affected by changing groundwater conditions, drought risk and strong natural soil variability.
The benefits
Soil CO₂ monitoring:
- Makes below-ground biological activity visible.
- Assesses whether NBS improve soil functioning.
- Supports more precise nutrient management.
- Links climate mitigation with everyday farm management.
- Identifies spatial and temporal variability within fields.
- Strengthens advisory services, demonstration activities and farmer learning.
- Supports long-term monitoring of regenerative agricultural practices.
Geographical Location
Hungary
Additional information
trans4num solution
Within the trans4num project, soil CO₂ emission monitoring was integrated into a nature-based farming system tested in Kimle, Hungary, comparing NBS with conventional management across a three-year rotation of durum wheat, sorghum and soybean. The NBS system combined crop rotation, no-tillage, reduced herbicide and pesticide use, poultry manure pellets, biostimulants, winter cover crops and continuous crop and soil monitoring.
CO₂ emissions were measured using a portable closed-chamber system alongside soil sampling, plant nutrient analyses, soil profile observations, drone monitoring and satellite imagery. Because a single CO₂ value cannot determine whether soil is gaining or losing carbon, all measurements were interpreted together.
Across all three crops, NBS consistently produced equal or lower CO₂ emissions per unit of harvested yield than conventional systems, with significant reductions for sorghum and durum wheat. Carbon efficiency improved while maintaining comparable yields, demonstrating the climate mitigation potential of NBS. Long-term monitoring also showed gradual improvements in soil organic carbon, organic matter, nitrogen cycling and biological activity, particularly within the upper 0–30 cm of soil.
Challenges / limitations
CO₂ emissions vary with season, temperature, soil moisture and recent field operations. Natural field variability can mask treatment effects, making repeated, long-term measurements essential.
Resources needed
Implementation requires portable CO₂ sensors, closed-chamber systems, soil moisture and temperature measurements, drone and satellite monitoring, farmer training, advisory support and consistent multi-year monitoring protocols.
Practical recommendations
Measure CO₂ repeatedly during the growing season, record weather and management conditions, compare treatments under similar conditions, & always interpret CO₂ measurements together with soil, plant and remote-sensing data rather than as a stand-alone indicator.
The Soil Profile Display at the Tündérsziget Ökopark in Dunasziget, Hungary, is a living outdoor classroom developed within the trans4num project. Through three full-depth soil profiles, visitors can observe authentic soil layers, root systems and biological activity beneath the surface. Together with the trans4num NBS Toolkit, it creates a complete learning experience linking hands-on experimentation with real-world landscape processes, making soil health and nature-based solutions (NBS) tangible for diverse audiences.
The need
Healthy soils underpin food production, water regulation, biodiversity and climate resilience, yet most soil processes occur underground and remain invisible. In the Szigetköz region, centuries of river regulation and water management have reshaped the floodplain landscape and influenced soil development. Understanding how soils function, how roots shape soil structure, and how farming practices affect long-term soil health is essential for sustainable land management.
The Soil Profile Display addresses this challenge by transforming complex soil processes into visible, engaging and easy-to-understand learning experiences.
The benefits
The installation enables visitors to:
- Visualise soil horizons and soil formation.
- Understand how roots regenerate and structure soils.
- Observe the effects of crop rotation, cover crops, legumes and deep-rooting species.
- Increase awareness of soil biodiversity and biological functions.
- Support practical learning on NBS and sustainable soil management.
- Provide an engaging educational environment for schools, farmers, advisors and policymakers, transforming soil science into a memorable experience.
Geographical Location
Hungary
Additional information
trans4num solution
The outdoor classroom consists of three excavated soil profiles, each 230 cm deep and preserved behind reinforced glass panels, allowing year-round observation of authentic soil layers and living root systems. The profiles are managed according to crop rotation principles and showcase deep-rooting crops, nitrogen-fixing legumes, cereals, companion plants and cover crops, while the site itself is maintained using no-till cultivation, cover cropping, mulching and compost application.
The Soil Profile Display is fully integrated with the trans4num NBS Toolkit. The mobile toolkit introduces concepts such as water infiltration, erosion, soil compaction and biological activity through practical experiments, while the outdoor classroom demonstrates these same processes under real field conditions. Together they create a complete learning pathway linking controlled experiments with living ecosystems.
Challenges / limitations
Successful implementation requires specialised excavation and profile stabilisation, continuous maintenance to preserve soil visibility, seasonal crop management, and skilled interpretation to maximise educational value.
Resources needed
Key requirements include excavation and construction materials, reinforced glass panels, annual crop establishment and maintenance, educational materials, trained facilitators, and access to complementary NBS Toolkit demonstrations.
Educational value & scaling
The Soil Profile Display has engaged school children, teachers, farmers, advisors, policymakers and visitors, demonstrating that soil is a living system capable of renewal when biological processes are supported. Combined with the NBS Toolkit, it forms a connected, scalable learning system that can be adapted and replicated across Europe to support the uptake of nature-based solutions.
The Soil Profile Display at the Tündérsziget Ökopark in Dunasziget, Hungary, is a living outdoor classroom developed within the trans4num project. Through three full-depth soil profiles, visitors can observe authentic soil layers, root systems and biological activity beneath the surface. Together with the trans4num NBS Toolkit, it creates a complete learning experience linking hands-on experimentation with real-world landscape processes, making soil health and nature-based solutions (NBS) tangible for diverse audiences.
The need
Healthy soils underpin food production, water regulation, biodiversity and climate resilience, yet most soil processes occur underground and remain invisible. In the Szigetköz region, centuries of river regulation and water management have reshaped the floodplain landscape and influenced soil development. Understanding how soils function, how roots shape soil structure, and how farming practices affect long-term soil health is essential for sustainable land management.
The Soil Profile Display addresses this challenge by transforming complex soil processes into visible, engaging and easy-to-understand learning experiences.
The benefits
The installation enables visitors to:
- Visualise soil horizons and soil formation.
- Understand how roots regenerate and structure soils.
- Observe the effects of crop rotation, cover crops, legumes and deep-rooting species.
- Increase awareness of soil biodiversity and biological functions.
- Support practical learning on NBS and sustainable soil management.
- Provide an engaging educational environment for schools, farmers, advisors and policymakers, transforming soil science into a memorable experience.
Geographical Location
Hungary
Additional information
trans4num solution
The outdoor classroom consists of three excavated soil profiles, each 230 cm deep and preserved behind reinforced glass panels, allowing year-round observation of authentic soil layers and living root systems. The profiles are managed according to crop rotation principles and showcase deep-rooting crops, nitrogen-fixing legumes, cereals, companion plants and cover crops, while the site itself is maintained using no-till cultivation, cover cropping, mulching and compost application.
The Soil Profile Display is fully integrated with the trans4num NBS Toolkit. The mobile toolkit introduces concepts such as water infiltration, erosion, soil compaction and biological activity through practical experiments, while the outdoor classroom demonstrates these same processes under real field conditions. Together they create a complete learning pathway linking controlled experiments with living ecosystems.
Challenges / limitations
Successful implementation requires specialised excavation and profile stabilisation, continuous maintenance to preserve soil visibility, seasonal crop management, and skilled interpretation to maximise educational value.
Resources needed
Key requirements include excavation and construction materials, reinforced glass panels, annual crop establishment and maintenance, educational materials, trained facilitators, and access to complementary NBS Toolkit demonstrations.
Educational value & scaling
The Soil Profile Display has engaged school children, teachers, farmers, advisors, policymakers and visitors, demonstrating that soil is a living system capable of renewal when biological processes are supported. Combined with the NBS Toolkit, it forms a connected, scalable learning system that can be adapted and replicated across Europe to support the uptake of nature-based solutions.
Although the benefits of nature-based solutions (NBS) are well established, farmers and advisors often find available information too abstract and difficult to translate into practice. Developed within the trans4num project, the NBS Toolkit creates an experiential learning environment where farmers, advisors and students can directly observe, test and understand NBS in practice.
The need
Climate change and intensive farming threaten soil health, water balance and nutrient cycling. Feedback from trans4num activities in Hungary showed that stakeholders are frustrated by contradictory information, while soil degradation processes remain largely invisible in everyday farming.
The NBS Toolkit addresses this gap by making hidden soil processes visible and understandable, linking scientific principles with real-world experience.
The benefits
The toolkit provides:
- Immediate visualisation by demonstrating soil erosion, compaction and healthy soil processes through hands-on experiments.
- Risk-free simulation, allowing users to test management decisions and immediately observe their potential impacts.
- A "seeing is believing" experience that reduces uncertainty around NBS by providing practical evidence of sustainable farming practices.
- Intergenerational learning, combining story-driven, comic-style materials co-created with young people to communicate complex concepts to all age groups.
- Social dialogue, linking policy objectives with practical realities and supporting communication between farmers, advisors, policymakers and local communities.
- Explore: Experiential and mobile toolkit for climate-resilient agriculture and …
- Explore the tools
- Explore more Practice Abstracts
Geographical Location
Hungary
Additional information
trans4num solution
Developed by the Pisztráng Kör Association, the NBS Toolkit is a mobile, modular and scalable learning ecosystem that replaces abstract teaching with portable, tactile and story-driven demonstrations. Wheeled cabinets containing a wind tunnel, rain simulator, soil compaction tester and worm hotel, together with analogue information panels, can be used in classrooms, professional events and field demonstrations. The toolkit combines:
- side-by-side soil comparisons showing conventional and sustainable management, compaction and soil cover;
- living soil organisms, including earthworms, to demonstrate biological soil processes;
- living vegetation illustrating crop rotation, nutrient cycling and erosion protection.
Challenges / limitations
Digital components reduced mobility because of power requirements, making analogue solutions more reliable for field use. Transporting soil-filled glass containers requires care, while successful demonstrations depend on experienced facilitators.
Resources needed
Implementation requires local craftsmen and designers to build the toolkit, trained educators or agricultural advisors to facilitate learning, and regular maintenance of the living ecosystem, including plants, earthworms and soil.
Practical recommendations & scaling
Co-design with local farmers, researchers and educators is recommended, demonstrations should follow a structured learning sequence (storytelling → modelling → experimentation → dialogue), and routine maintenance is essential. The toolkit is permanently based at the Szigetköz Experience Centre but is designed for adaptation to other regions, NBS applications and future European projects.
Although the benefits of nature-based solutions (NBS) are well established, farmers and advisors often find available information too abstract and difficult to translate into practice. Developed within the trans4num project, the NBS Toolkit creates an experiential learning environment where farmers, advisors and students can directly observe, test and understand NBS in practice.
The need
Climate change and intensive farming threaten soil health, water balance and nutrient cycling. Feedback from trans4num activities in Hungary showed that stakeholders are frustrated by contradictory information, while soil degradation processes remain largely invisible in everyday farming.
The NBS Toolkit addresses this gap by making hidden soil processes visible and understandable, linking scientific principles with real-world experience.
The benefits
The toolkit provides:
- Immediate visualisation by demonstrating soil erosion, compaction and healthy soil processes through hands-on experiments.
- Risk-free simulation, allowing users to test management decisions and immediately observe their potential impacts.
- A "seeing is believing" experience that reduces uncertainty around NBS by providing practical evidence of sustainable farming practices.
- Intergenerational learning, combining story-driven, comic-style materials co-created with young people to communicate complex concepts to all age groups.
- Social dialogue, linking policy objectives with practical realities and supporting communication between farmers, advisors, policymakers and local communities.
- Explore: Experiential and mobile toolkit for climate-resilient agriculture and …
- Explore the tools
- Explore more Practice Abstracts
Geographical Location
Hungary
Additional information
trans4num solution
Developed by the Pisztráng Kör Association, the NBS Toolkit is a mobile, modular and scalable learning ecosystem that replaces abstract teaching with portable, tactile and story-driven demonstrations. Wheeled cabinets containing a wind tunnel, rain simulator, soil compaction tester and worm hotel, together with analogue information panels, can be used in classrooms, professional events and field demonstrations. The toolkit combines:
- side-by-side soil comparisons showing conventional and sustainable management, compaction and soil cover;
- living soil organisms, including earthworms, to demonstrate biological soil processes;
- living vegetation illustrating crop rotation, nutrient cycling and erosion protection.
Challenges / limitations
Digital components reduced mobility because of power requirements, making analogue solutions more reliable for field use. Transporting soil-filled glass containers requires care, while successful demonstrations depend on experienced facilitators.
Resources needed
Implementation requires local craftsmen and designers to build the toolkit, trained educators or agricultural advisors to facilitate learning, and regular maintenance of the living ecosystem, including plants, earthworms and soil.
Practical recommendations & scaling
Co-design with local farmers, researchers and educators is recommended, demonstrations should follow a structured learning sequence (storytelling → modelling → experimentation → dialogue), and routine maintenance is essential. The toolkit is permanently based at the Szigetköz Experience Centre but is designed for adaptation to other regions, NBS applications and future European projects.
Livestock production generates valuable food and materials, but bones and other unused by-products are often lost from the agricultural system. Animal bones contain hydroxyapatite, a calcium phosphate mineral that can be converted into a plant-available phosphorus fertiliser. Field trials have shown that this recycled phosphorus source can achieve crop yields comparable to conventional phosphorus fertilisers.
The need
Fertilisation is essential to replace nutrients removed through crop production and maintain agricultural productivity. Phosphorus fertilisers are mainly produced from mined rock phosphate, but this resource faces two major challenges. Around 80% of global reserves are located in Morocco and Western Sahara, making supplies vulnerable to geopolitical instability, while some rock phosphate contains cadmium, creating a risk of long-term soil contamination.
Recycling phosphorus from animal bones offers a circular alternative that reduces dependence on imported rock phosphate while avoiding cadmium contamination.
The benefits
The recycled phosphorus fertiliser provides several advantages:
- It recovers livestock waste and creates an additional domestic source of phosphorus, supporting more resilient fertiliser supply chains.
- It avoids cadmium contamination associated with some mined rock phosphate.
- Besides phosphorus, it also supplies other crop nutrients. For winter wheat, the fertiliser can provide the full phosphorus and sulphur requirements, together with around 6% of nitrogen and 8% of potassium needs, reducing fertiliser costs and resource use.
- Developing fertilisers from livestock by-products can create new value chains and increase the economic value of animal production.
Geographical Location
United Kingdom
Additional information
trans4num solution
A multi-year field trial was conducted at Rothamsted Research (North Wyke, UK) using grass silage and winter arable crops. Three fertiliser treatments were compared:
- conventional commercial fertilisers;
- a novel phosphorus fertiliser produced from livestock waste (animal bones);
- an unfertilised control.
Fertiliser applications followed UK recommendations. Soil nutrient status was assessed before application, and phosphorus, nitrogen, potassium and sulphur were supplied according to crop requirements. Where the novel fertiliser alone could not fully meet nutrient demand, conventional fertilisers were added so that all fertilised treatments received equivalent nutrient inputs.
Fertilised crops consistently outperformed the unfertilised control, while no significant differences were observed between the recycled fertiliser and conventional fertiliser for grass silage or winter wheat yields. These results demonstrate that phosphorus fertiliser produced from livestock waste can perform as effectively as conventional phosphorus fertilisers. Further nutrient analyses will investigate additional crop benefits previously observed in controlled-environment studies.
Challenges / limitations
Key barriers include technical and business challenges in bringing the product to market, high manufacturing energy costs, farmer acceptance of a novel fertiliser, and established purchasing practices based on commodity pricing.
Resources needed
Successful implementation requires supportive phosphorus policies, business development support for SMEs entering the fertiliser market, and effective knowledge exchange to demonstrate the scientific evidence and build confidence among agronomists and farmers.
Livestock production generates valuable food and materials, but bones and other unused by-products are often lost from the agricultural system. Animal bones contain hydroxyapatite, a calcium phosphate mineral that can be converted into a plant-available phosphorus fertiliser. Field trials have shown that this recycled phosphorus source can achieve crop yields comparable to conventional phosphorus fertilisers.
The need
Fertilisation is essential to replace nutrients removed through crop production and maintain agricultural productivity. Phosphorus fertilisers are mainly produced from mined rock phosphate, but this resource faces two major challenges. Around 80% of global reserves are located in Morocco and Western Sahara, making supplies vulnerable to geopolitical instability, while some rock phosphate contains cadmium, creating a risk of long-term soil contamination.
Recycling phosphorus from animal bones offers a circular alternative that reduces dependence on imported rock phosphate while avoiding cadmium contamination.
The benefits
The recycled phosphorus fertiliser provides several advantages:
- It recovers livestock waste and creates an additional domestic source of phosphorus, supporting more resilient fertiliser supply chains.
- It avoids cadmium contamination associated with some mined rock phosphate.
- Besides phosphorus, it also supplies other crop nutrients. For winter wheat, the fertiliser can provide the full phosphorus and sulphur requirements, together with around 6% of nitrogen and 8% of potassium needs, reducing fertiliser costs and resource use.
- Developing fertilisers from livestock by-products can create new value chains and increase the economic value of animal production.
Geographical Location
United Kingdom
Additional information
trans4num solution
A multi-year field trial was conducted at Rothamsted Research (North Wyke, UK) using grass silage and winter arable crops. Three fertiliser treatments were compared:
- conventional commercial fertilisers;
- a novel phosphorus fertiliser produced from livestock waste (animal bones);
- an unfertilised control.
Fertiliser applications followed UK recommendations. Soil nutrient status was assessed before application, and phosphorus, nitrogen, potassium and sulphur were supplied according to crop requirements. Where the novel fertiliser alone could not fully meet nutrient demand, conventional fertilisers were added so that all fertilised treatments received equivalent nutrient inputs.
Fertilised crops consistently outperformed the unfertilised control, while no significant differences were observed between the recycled fertiliser and conventional fertiliser for grass silage or winter wheat yields. These results demonstrate that phosphorus fertiliser produced from livestock waste can perform as effectively as conventional phosphorus fertilisers. Further nutrient analyses will investigate additional crop benefits previously observed in controlled-environment studies.
Challenges / limitations
Key barriers include technical and business challenges in bringing the product to market, high manufacturing energy costs, farmer acceptance of a novel fertiliser, and established purchasing practices based on commodity pricing.
Resources needed
Successful implementation requires supportive phosphorus policies, business development support for SMEs entering the fertiliser market, and effective knowledge exchange to demonstrate the scientific evidence and build confidence among agronomists and farmers.
The trans4num Decision Support Tool (DST) bridges the gap between farm-level nutrient management and landscape-scale environmental impacts. By linking field-level actions to broader outcomes, it helps farmers, advisors and policymakers plan and optimise nature-based solutions (NBS), visualise trade-offs, and collaboratively identify efficient, regionally adapted strategies for sustainable agriculture.
The need
Agricultural nutrient management decisions are usually made at farm or field level, while impacts such as nitrogen leaching, water pollution, biodiversity loss and soil degradation occur across landscapes. The DST was developed to bridge this mismatch by:
- linking field actions to landscape outcomes;
- visualising trade-offs between environmental objectives and agricultural productivity across different spatial scales;
- supporting the planning and implementation of NBS at landscape level; and
- fostering collaboration between farmers, advisors, policymakers and the wider bioeconomy sector.
The benefits
For farmers and farmer associations
- Demonstrates how field management influences landscape outcomes.
- Identifies new value chains, such as perennial grass or catch crops linked to green biorefineries.
- Evaluates realistic crop rotations rather than single-year crops or unrealistic farm redesigns.
- Supports cooperative decision-making across shared landscapes.
For advisors and policymakers
The DST facilitates dialogue between stakeholders, visualises environmental and economic trade-offs, strengthens advisory services by translating technical outputs into practical recommendations, supports collaborative policy design, and helps assess which policy options are feasible under real farming conditions.
Geographical Location
Denmark, Hungary, Netherlands, United Kingdom, Switzerland
Additional information
trans4num solution
The DST is a spatially explicit, data-driven optimisation tool that evaluates the impacts of NBS under geographically varying conditions. Using mixed-integer programming, it allocates crop rotations and management strategies across landscapes. Transition matrices quantify how management changes affect nitrogen losses, yields and economic returns for different soil types, while field-level spatial data capture geographical variability. The tool combines a React-based interface with a Python backend and processes tabular and spatial datasets.
The DST supports discussion rather than prescribing decisions. Users first define regional objectives and constraints, after which the model identifies the most efficient spatial allocation of measures. If objectives are unrealistic, the tool highlights this. Outputs include optimisation maps, crop-share comparisons, radar charts comparing economic and environmental performance, and regional nitrogen balances.
Challenges / limitations
The DST is designed primarily for facilitated workshops rather than individual farm use. Applying it to new regions requires substantial local data, particularly transition matrices describing NBS performance under local conditions.
Resources needed
Implementation requires spatial agricultural datasets, clearly defined regional objectives, geographically explicit information on NBS effects, transition matrices describing management impacts, and a trusted facilitator such as a modeller, researcher or advisor.
Transferability
Developed for the Limfjord region in Denmark, the DST can be transferred to other regions by adapting objectives, constraints and local datasets. It was co-designed through transdisciplinary workshops with farmers, advisors and planners, and tested in Denmark, Hungary, the Netherlands and the UK, demonstrating its value for collaborative landscape planning.
The trans4num Decision Support Tool (DST) bridges the gap between farm-level nutrient management and landscape-scale environmental impacts. By linking field-level actions to broader outcomes, it helps farmers, advisors and policymakers plan and optimise nature-based solutions (NBS), visualise trade-offs, and collaboratively identify efficient, regionally adapted strategies for sustainable agriculture.
The need
Agricultural nutrient management decisions are usually made at farm or field level, while impacts such as nitrogen leaching, water pollution, biodiversity loss and soil degradation occur across landscapes. The DST was developed to bridge this mismatch by:
- linking field actions to landscape outcomes;
- visualising trade-offs between environmental objectives and agricultural productivity across different spatial scales;
- supporting the planning and implementation of NBS at landscape level; and
- fostering collaboration between farmers, advisors, policymakers and the wider bioeconomy sector.
The benefits
For farmers and farmer associations
- Demonstrates how field management influences landscape outcomes.
- Identifies new value chains, such as perennial grass or catch crops linked to green biorefineries.
- Evaluates realistic crop rotations rather than single-year crops or unrealistic farm redesigns.
- Supports cooperative decision-making across shared landscapes.
For advisors and policymakers
The DST facilitates dialogue between stakeholders, visualises environmental and economic trade-offs, strengthens advisory services by translating technical outputs into practical recommendations, supports collaborative policy design, and helps assess which policy options are feasible under real farming conditions.
Geographical Location
Denmark, Hungary, Netherlands, United Kingdom, Switzerland
Additional information
trans4num solution
The DST is a spatially explicit, data-driven optimisation tool that evaluates the impacts of NBS under geographically varying conditions. Using mixed-integer programming, it allocates crop rotations and management strategies across landscapes. Transition matrices quantify how management changes affect nitrogen losses, yields and economic returns for different soil types, while field-level spatial data capture geographical variability. The tool combines a React-based interface with a Python backend and processes tabular and spatial datasets.
The DST supports discussion rather than prescribing decisions. Users first define regional objectives and constraints, after which the model identifies the most efficient spatial allocation of measures. If objectives are unrealistic, the tool highlights this. Outputs include optimisation maps, crop-share comparisons, radar charts comparing economic and environmental performance, and regional nitrogen balances.
Challenges / limitations
The DST is designed primarily for facilitated workshops rather than individual farm use. Applying it to new regions requires substantial local data, particularly transition matrices describing NBS performance under local conditions.
Resources needed
Implementation requires spatial agricultural datasets, clearly defined regional objectives, geographically explicit information on NBS effects, transition matrices describing management impacts, and a trusted facilitator such as a modeller, researcher or advisor.
Transferability
Developed for the Limfjord region in Denmark, the DST can be transferred to other regions by adapting objectives, constraints and local datasets. It was co-designed through transdisciplinary workshops with farmers, advisors and planners, and tested in Denmark, Hungary, the Netherlands and the UK, demonstrating its value for collaborative landscape planning.
The benefits of adding green compost to fields and growing cover crops depend on soil cultivation practices and local soil texture. In particular, the amount of clay in the soil influences nutrient availability and the retention of soil organic carbon.
The need
Rising synthetic fertiliser costs and their environmental impacts, including greenhouse gas emissions and nutrient leaching, have increased interest in organic amendments as nature-based solutions for sustainable nutrient management. Green municipal compost and over-winter cover crops can supply nutrients and improve soil health, but their effectiveness depends on the cropping system and local environmental conditions.
Compost and cover crops also increase soil organic carbon, helping restore soil structure, improve water infiltration and retention, and strengthen resilience to floods, droughts and climate change. Cover crop roots further enhance soil hydraulic conductivity by creating connected macropores.
To maximise the benefits of replacing synthetic fertilisers with organic sources, farmers and advisors need locally relevant evidence on crop and soil responses. Long-term monitoring is essential because improvements in soil health, nutrient cycling and resilience develop gradually and support informed decision-making.
The greatest benefits are achieved when compost and cover crops are combined with other nature-based solutions, such as diverse crop rotations and reduced tillage. This systems approach improves nutrient-use efficiency, supports healthier soils and helps overcome challenges associated with reduced tillage, including temporary soil compaction and weed pressure.
- Explore: Benefits of compost and cover crops for soil health and yield
- Explore more trans4num Practice Abstracts
Geographical Location
United Kingdom
Additional information
trans4num solution
Compost (30 t/ha wet weight) and over-winter cover crops were tested for eight years at two UK sites with contrasting sandy loam and clay loam soils under different crop rotations and conventional or reduced tillage.
Compost increased winter wheat yields by 4% on sandy loam and 9% on clay loam, creating opportunities to reduce autumn fertiliser applications. On sandy loam, residual nitrogen remained available in spring, allowing further reductions in spring fertiliser use. On clay loam, nitrogen released over winter became bound within mineral aggregates and was less available to crops.
Spring barley yields increased by 18% only on sandy loam soils. On clay loam, higher mineral-associated organic matter reduced bioavailable nitrogen, limiting the replacement of synthetic fertiliser. Reduced tillage enhanced the benefits of compost and cover crops through a synergistic effect.
High-biomass cover crops reduced spring barley yields on clay loam by capturing available nutrients before the following crop, suggesting that cover crops may be less suitable on heavier soils. Compost combined with reduced tillage increased soil organic carbon at both sites, with larger gains on clay loam, improving long-term soil function and crop resilience.
Challenges / limitations
The main constraints are compost availability, transport costs and the fact that fertiliser savings vary between fields and years depending on nutrient cycling and cover crop growth.
Resources needed
Field-scale digital twins or decision-support tools integrating nutrient cycling, soil moisture, crop growth modelling and field monitoring would help optimise fertiliser strategies and reduce synthetic fertiliser use.
The benefits of adding green compost to fields and growing cover crops depend on soil cultivation practices and local soil texture. In particular, the amount of clay in the soil influences nutrient availability and the retention of soil organic carbon.
The need
Rising synthetic fertiliser costs and their environmental impacts, including greenhouse gas emissions and nutrient leaching, have increased interest in organic amendments as nature-based solutions for sustainable nutrient management. Green municipal compost and over-winter cover crops can supply nutrients and improve soil health, but their effectiveness depends on the cropping system and local environmental conditions.
Compost and cover crops also increase soil organic carbon, helping restore soil structure, improve water infiltration and retention, and strengthen resilience to floods, droughts and climate change. Cover crop roots further enhance soil hydraulic conductivity by creating connected macropores.
To maximise the benefits of replacing synthetic fertilisers with organic sources, farmers and advisors need locally relevant evidence on crop and soil responses. Long-term monitoring is essential because improvements in soil health, nutrient cycling and resilience develop gradually and support informed decision-making.
The greatest benefits are achieved when compost and cover crops are combined with other nature-based solutions, such as diverse crop rotations and reduced tillage. This systems approach improves nutrient-use efficiency, supports healthier soils and helps overcome challenges associated with reduced tillage, including temporary soil compaction and weed pressure.
- Explore: Benefits of compost and cover crops for soil health and yield
- Explore more trans4num Practice Abstracts
Geographical Location
United Kingdom
Additional information
trans4num solution
Compost (30 t/ha wet weight) and over-winter cover crops were tested for eight years at two UK sites with contrasting sandy loam and clay loam soils under different crop rotations and conventional or reduced tillage.
Compost increased winter wheat yields by 4% on sandy loam and 9% on clay loam, creating opportunities to reduce autumn fertiliser applications. On sandy loam, residual nitrogen remained available in spring, allowing further reductions in spring fertiliser use. On clay loam, nitrogen released over winter became bound within mineral aggregates and was less available to crops.
Spring barley yields increased by 18% only on sandy loam soils. On clay loam, higher mineral-associated organic matter reduced bioavailable nitrogen, limiting the replacement of synthetic fertiliser. Reduced tillage enhanced the benefits of compost and cover crops through a synergistic effect.
High-biomass cover crops reduced spring barley yields on clay loam by capturing available nutrients before the following crop, suggesting that cover crops may be less suitable on heavier soils. Compost combined with reduced tillage increased soil organic carbon at both sites, with larger gains on clay loam, improving long-term soil function and crop resilience.
Challenges / limitations
The main constraints are compost availability, transport costs and the fact that fertiliser savings vary between fields and years depending on nutrient cycling and cover crop growth.
Resources needed
Field-scale digital twins or decision-support tools integrating nutrient cycling, soil moisture, crop growth modelling and field monitoring would help optimise fertiliser strategies and reduce synthetic fertiliser use.
The goal of AgriFuture is to develop a future-proof crop rotation system that meets the needs of tomorrow’s farming practices. In this ‘farm of the future’, solutions are explored at the systems level for some of agriculture’s most pressing challenges, including:
- Herbicide-resistant weeds
- Limited availability of chemical inputs
- Rising production costs
- Declining water quality
- Extreme weather and climate change
By addressing these issues in an integrated way, AgriFuture is working toward a farming system that is not only ecologically and economically sustainable, but also resilient and innovative. The Oldambt crop rotation system is on the brink of a necessary renewal. To become more future-proof and sustainable, it needs a "version 2.0": a cropping system that not only offers economic viability for farmers but also contributes actively to addressing broader societal challenges .Key focus areas include:
- Reduced use of fertilizers and crop protection products
- Enhancing biodiversity
- Improving soil health
- Protecting water quality (EU Water Framework Directive)
- Climate adaptation
Several promising ideas for sustainable transition are already in motion — both at the Ebelsheerd experimental farm and among individual farmers in the region.
Examples of promising initiatives:
- Expanding crop rotations with legumes or mixed cropping systems
- Mechanical weed control and the use of robotics as alternatives to chemical inputs
- Collaborations between dairy and arable farms
- Use of organic by-products, such as compost or bokashi
By sharing knowledge and exchanging experiences, we are collectively shaping a renewed crop rotation system that is both profitable and environmentally responsible.
Additional information
Goals for future-oriented arable farming:
- Develop a sustainable and future-proof Oldambt crop rotation system by 2030
- Achieve weed control and crop health without the use of substances listed under the CfS (Candidatesfor Substitution) list
- Significantly reduce the Environmental Impact Point System (MBP) at both farm and crop level
- Replace linear (synthetic) fertilizers with circular alternatives
- Implement climate-resilient water management tailored to the revised crop rotation
- Monitor soil health and biodiversity using Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
- Map the CO₂ reduction potential of the cropping system
- Maintain or improve the financial profitability of the farm
Challenges
- Working toward long-term goals using the tools and knowledge available today
- Balancing innovation with practical applicability on real farms
- Ensuring that forward-looking solutions remain feasible in day-to-day operations
- Aligning different perspectives from farmers, researchers, and advisors
- Maintaining ongoing dialogue to support shared direction and decision-making
Resources
- Access to appropriate crop rotations, limiting cereals to a maximum of 50% and incorporating spring crops
- Machinery and/or robotics for effective weed control as an alternative to chemical herbicides
- Agronomic support and knowledge sharing to reduce reliance on chemical inputs, including the use of resilient crop varieties and optimal sowing strategies
- Understanding of circular agriculture opportunities in the region, including cooperation between arable and livestock farms
- Monitoring tools to track soil and crop health and guide adaptive management
The goal of AgriFuture is to develop a future-proof crop rotation system that meets the needs of tomorrow’s farming practices. In this ‘farm of the future’, solutions are explored at the systems level for some of agriculture’s most pressing challenges, including:
- Herbicide-resistant weeds
- Limited availability of chemical inputs
- Rising production costs
- Declining water quality
- Extreme weather and climate change
By addressing these issues in an integrated way, AgriFuture is working toward a farming system that is not only ecologically and economically sustainable, but also resilient and innovative. The Oldambt crop rotation system is on the brink of a necessary renewal. To become more future-proof and sustainable, it needs a "version 2.0": a cropping system that not only offers economic viability for farmers but also contributes actively to addressing broader societal challenges .Key focus areas include:
- Reduced use of fertilizers and crop protection products
- Enhancing biodiversity
- Improving soil health
- Protecting water quality (EU Water Framework Directive)
- Climate adaptation
Several promising ideas for sustainable transition are already in motion — both at the Ebelsheerd experimental farm and among individual farmers in the region.
Examples of promising initiatives:
- Expanding crop rotations with legumes or mixed cropping systems
- Mechanical weed control and the use of robotics as alternatives to chemical inputs
- Collaborations between dairy and arable farms
- Use of organic by-products, such as compost or bokashi
By sharing knowledge and exchanging experiences, we are collectively shaping a renewed crop rotation system that is both profitable and environmentally responsible.
Additional information
Goals for future-oriented arable farming:
- Develop a sustainable and future-proof Oldambt crop rotation system by 2030
- Achieve weed control and crop health without the use of substances listed under the CfS (Candidatesfor Substitution) list
- Significantly reduce the Environmental Impact Point System (MBP) at both farm and crop level
- Replace linear (synthetic) fertilizers with circular alternatives
- Implement climate-resilient water management tailored to the revised crop rotation
- Monitor soil health and biodiversity using Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
- Map the CO₂ reduction potential of the cropping system
- Maintain or improve the financial profitability of the farm
Challenges
- Working toward long-term goals using the tools and knowledge available today
- Balancing innovation with practical applicability on real farms
- Ensuring that forward-looking solutions remain feasible in day-to-day operations
- Aligning different perspectives from farmers, researchers, and advisors
- Maintaining ongoing dialogue to support shared direction and decision-making
Resources
- Access to appropriate crop rotations, limiting cereals to a maximum of 50% and incorporating spring crops
- Machinery and/or robotics for effective weed control as an alternative to chemical herbicides
- Agronomic support and knowledge sharing to reduce reliance on chemical inputs, including the use of resilient crop varieties and optimal sowing strategies
- Understanding of circular agriculture opportunities in the region, including cooperation between arable and livestock farms
- Monitoring tools to track soil and crop health and guide adaptive management
The AgriFuture project at Kollumerwaard focuses on seed potato cultivation as a key element within a future-proof crop rotation system. Seed potatoes come with specific demands regarding soil quality, crop rotation, and disease management, making them a relevant case in the transition toward more sustainable arable farming. The aim is to explore how seed potato cultivation aligns with the core principles of AgriFuture, such as:
- Reducing the use of chemical crop protection products
- Preserving and improving soil health
- Utilizing circular (organic) fertilizers
- Contributing to biodiversity and climate goals
The agricultural system is being shaped by a wide range of developments that call for an integrated approach and a clear vision for the future.
Key themes include:
- Climate change
- Limited availability of crop protection products
- Salinization of farmland
- Requirements from the Water Framework Directive
- The shift toward circular agriculture
- The protein and oil crop transition
- Use and availability of animal manure
- Growing societal expectations around biodiversity and landscape quality
These developments lead to one central question: What will the arable farming of the future look like and how do today’s decisions help us get there?
Benefits
- Future-proof seed potato cultivation: Meeting stricter requirements for crop protection ,fertilization, and environmental impact — without compromising on quality or yield.
- Soil health as a foundation: Focused attention on soil life and structure ensures a strong crop start and reduces the risk of disease.
- Less dependent on chemicals: Mechanical weed control, resilient varieties, and precision technology help significantly reduce chemical inputs.
- Ready for stricter regulations: Proactively responding to upcoming legislation on fertilizers, crop protection, and water quality.
- Boosting biodiversity: Flower strips, strip cropping, and other measures support pollinators and natural pest control
Additional information
Benefits
- More resilient to extreme weather: A robust crop rotation and healthy soil increase resilience to drought, excess rainfall, and temperature extremes.
- Innovation driving improvement: Precision farming and robotics enable more efficient use of labor and resources.
- An inspiration for fellow farmers: A regional example farm that inspires and supports others in transitioning toward circular agriculture.
AgriFuture aims to develop an arable farming system that meets ambitious future requirements for climate, environmental impact, and biodiversity. The approach is based on knowledge and technologies that are already available today, with room for further refinement through innovations such as robotics and precision farming.
Specific targets compared to current average arable farming practices:
- 30% reduction in mineral input
- 90% reduction in crop protection product use
- 90% reduction in chemical weed control
- 30% reduction in direct and indirect energy input
- 200% increase in above-ground biodiversity
- 100% increase in soil biodiversity
- 90% of mineral input sourced from regional nutrient cycles
- 1,500 kg CO₂/ha/year additional carbon sequestration
Challenges
It’s challenging to make future-oriented decisions while relying on current knowledge, technology, and regulations. Innovations must be bold, but still applicable and workable for real farms in the region. Farmers, advisors, and experts often have different priorities, aligning them requires continuous dialogue and coordination. Shifting policies, market demands, and climate conditions create unpredictability, making long-term planning complex.
Resources
- Knowledge of the latest techniques and innovations
- Crop expertise within a renewed, future-oriented crop rotation system
- Active collaboration with various partners to expand knowledge and share experiences
The AgriFuture project at Kollumerwaard focuses on seed potato cultivation as a key element within a future-proof crop rotation system. Seed potatoes come with specific demands regarding soil quality, crop rotation, and disease management, making them a relevant case in the transition toward more sustainable arable farming. The aim is to explore how seed potato cultivation aligns with the core principles of AgriFuture, such as:
- Reducing the use of chemical crop protection products
- Preserving and improving soil health
- Utilizing circular (organic) fertilizers
- Contributing to biodiversity and climate goals
The agricultural system is being shaped by a wide range of developments that call for an integrated approach and a clear vision for the future.
Key themes include:
- Climate change
- Limited availability of crop protection products
- Salinization of farmland
- Requirements from the Water Framework Directive
- The shift toward circular agriculture
- The protein and oil crop transition
- Use and availability of animal manure
- Growing societal expectations around biodiversity and landscape quality
These developments lead to one central question: What will the arable farming of the future look like and how do today’s decisions help us get there?
Benefits
- Future-proof seed potato cultivation: Meeting stricter requirements for crop protection ,fertilization, and environmental impact — without compromising on quality or yield.
- Soil health as a foundation: Focused attention on soil life and structure ensures a strong crop start and reduces the risk of disease.
- Less dependent on chemicals: Mechanical weed control, resilient varieties, and precision technology help significantly reduce chemical inputs.
- Ready for stricter regulations: Proactively responding to upcoming legislation on fertilizers, crop protection, and water quality.
- Boosting biodiversity: Flower strips, strip cropping, and other measures support pollinators and natural pest control
Additional information
Benefits
- More resilient to extreme weather: A robust crop rotation and healthy soil increase resilience to drought, excess rainfall, and temperature extremes.
- Innovation driving improvement: Precision farming and robotics enable more efficient use of labor and resources.
- An inspiration for fellow farmers: A regional example farm that inspires and supports others in transitioning toward circular agriculture.
AgriFuture aims to develop an arable farming system that meets ambitious future requirements for climate, environmental impact, and biodiversity. The approach is based on knowledge and technologies that are already available today, with room for further refinement through innovations such as robotics and precision farming.
Specific targets compared to current average arable farming practices:
- 30% reduction in mineral input
- 90% reduction in crop protection product use
- 90% reduction in chemical weed control
- 30% reduction in direct and indirect energy input
- 200% increase in above-ground biodiversity
- 100% increase in soil biodiversity
- 90% of mineral input sourced from regional nutrient cycles
- 1,500 kg CO₂/ha/year additional carbon sequestration
Challenges
It’s challenging to make future-oriented decisions while relying on current knowledge, technology, and regulations. Innovations must be bold, but still applicable and workable for real farms in the region. Farmers, advisors, and experts often have different priorities, aligning them requires continuous dialogue and coordination. Shifting policies, market demands, and climate conditions create unpredictability, making long-term planning complex.
Resources
- Knowledge of the latest techniques and innovations
- Crop expertise within a renewed, future-oriented crop rotation system
- Active collaboration with various partners to expand knowledge and share experiences
In today’s agricultural and industrial systems, a significant portion of biological resources is either wasted or underutilized. While green biomass like grass and clover is rich in valuable components—such as fibers, sugars, and nutrients—most of its potential remains untapped after initial processing for protein. Traditional value chains often stop at the primary product. However, sustainability and economic resilience require that we go further—transforming secondary outputs (like pulp and brown juice) into inputs for new value chains. This is known as cascade utilization.
At the same time, industrial decarbonization pathways, such as Power-to-X (PtX) technologies, are creating new resource flows like excess heat and biogenic CO₂. These flows, if coordinated wisely, can serve as inputs for agriculture and green refining. Unlocking this interconnected potential will require:
- New business models and partnerships across sectors
- Investment in R&D to mature low-TRL technologies
- Supportive policy and regulatory frameworks
- Regional planning to enable physical co-location and material exchange
Benefits
Full-value recovery: Green biomass contains much more than just protein. Press cake (pulp) and brown juice left after protein extraction can be further processed into valuable products for multiple sectors.
Climate-friendly production: These processes reduce agricultural waste and carbon emissions, while enabling local production of packaging, textiles, fuels, and building materials.
Industrial synergies: Residual heat, carbon, and process water from Power-to-X (PtX) systems can be reused in biorefineries, creating closed-loop, resource-efficient value chains.
Economic development: Cascade utilization and PtX symbiosis support the emergence of new green industries, jobs, and regional development—positioning northwest Jutland as a hub for climate-smart innovation
Additional information
The green biorefining process begins with protein extraction, but it doesn’t end there. What remains—pulp and brown juice—has substantial commercial and environmental value:
- Pulp (pressed plant fiber):
- Can replace wood fibers in products like cardboard, insulation, and bioplastics
- Can be further refined into cellulose for high-end uses like textile production or packaging
- Has the advantage of lower lignin content compared to wood, easing purification processes
- Brown Juice (sugar- and nutrient-rich liquid):
- Used for precision fermentation to grow targeted microorganisms for food, feed, or pharma
- Can be converted into ethanol or other biofuels
- Offers potential as a biogas substrate or as part of organic fertilizer systems
Together, these streams can power new circular business models rooted in sustainability and zero-waste principles.
PtX technologies—such as hydrogen production from renewable electricity—produce valuable by-products like excess heat and CO₂, which can feed into green refining operations:
- Excess heat can dry protein pastes, evaporate brown juice, or power fermentation processes
- Process water from refining can be cleaned and reused in hydrogen production
- Biogenic CO₂ and leftover biomass can feed into biogas or biochar production
By co-locating facilities, industries can exchange heat, water, and nutrients—reducing costs, emissions, and resource loss. This model is particularly powerful in regions like northwest Jutland, where strong agricultural traditions, renewable energy capacity, and innovation leadership create ideal conditions for integrated green value chains.
Challenges
- Limited maturity of cascade-processing technologies
- Need for strategic co-location of industries (PtX and biorefining)
- Lack of standard frameworks for sharing residual flows across sectors
Resources
- Policy support and investment in infrastructure
- Industrial-scale R&D and tech development
- Agreements for resource sharing between facilities
In today’s agricultural and industrial systems, a significant portion of biological resources is either wasted or underutilized. While green biomass like grass and clover is rich in valuable components—such as fibers, sugars, and nutrients—most of its potential remains untapped after initial processing for protein. Traditional value chains often stop at the primary product. However, sustainability and economic resilience require that we go further—transforming secondary outputs (like pulp and brown juice) into inputs for new value chains. This is known as cascade utilization.
At the same time, industrial decarbonization pathways, such as Power-to-X (PtX) technologies, are creating new resource flows like excess heat and biogenic CO₂. These flows, if coordinated wisely, can serve as inputs for agriculture and green refining. Unlocking this interconnected potential will require:
- New business models and partnerships across sectors
- Investment in R&D to mature low-TRL technologies
- Supportive policy and regulatory frameworks
- Regional planning to enable physical co-location and material exchange
Benefits
Full-value recovery: Green biomass contains much more than just protein. Press cake (pulp) and brown juice left after protein extraction can be further processed into valuable products for multiple sectors.
Climate-friendly production: These processes reduce agricultural waste and carbon emissions, while enabling local production of packaging, textiles, fuels, and building materials.
Industrial synergies: Residual heat, carbon, and process water from Power-to-X (PtX) systems can be reused in biorefineries, creating closed-loop, resource-efficient value chains.
Economic development: Cascade utilization and PtX symbiosis support the emergence of new green industries, jobs, and regional development—positioning northwest Jutland as a hub for climate-smart innovation
Additional information
The green biorefining process begins with protein extraction, but it doesn’t end there. What remains—pulp and brown juice—has substantial commercial and environmental value:
- Pulp (pressed plant fiber):
- Can replace wood fibers in products like cardboard, insulation, and bioplastics
- Can be further refined into cellulose for high-end uses like textile production or packaging
- Has the advantage of lower lignin content compared to wood, easing purification processes
- Brown Juice (sugar- and nutrient-rich liquid):
- Used for precision fermentation to grow targeted microorganisms for food, feed, or pharma
- Can be converted into ethanol or other biofuels
- Offers potential as a biogas substrate or as part of organic fertilizer systems
Together, these streams can power new circular business models rooted in sustainability and zero-waste principles.
PtX technologies—such as hydrogen production from renewable electricity—produce valuable by-products like excess heat and CO₂, which can feed into green refining operations:
- Excess heat can dry protein pastes, evaporate brown juice, or power fermentation processes
- Process water from refining can be cleaned and reused in hydrogen production
- Biogenic CO₂ and leftover biomass can feed into biogas or biochar production
By co-locating facilities, industries can exchange heat, water, and nutrients—reducing costs, emissions, and resource loss. This model is particularly powerful in regions like northwest Jutland, where strong agricultural traditions, renewable energy capacity, and innovation leadership create ideal conditions for integrated green value chains.
Challenges
- Limited maturity of cascade-processing technologies
- Need for strategic co-location of industries (PtX and biorefining)
- Lack of standard frameworks for sharing residual flows across sectors
Resources
- Policy support and investment in infrastructure
- Industrial-scale R&D and tech development
- Agreements for resource sharing between facilities
The trans4num INSPIRE Hackathon 2024 fostered innovation and collaboration in sustainable nutrient management, integrating Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) with digital tools to strengthen research-practice connections and international cooperation. The trans4num INSPIRE Hackathon 2024 accelerated innovation in sustainable nutrient management by fostering collaboration between farmers, researchers, and technology experts. It provided a platform for developing and testing practical solutions, ensuring that NBS and digital tools could be effectively applied in real agricultural settings. The event helped bridge the gap between scientific research and practice, enabling participants to co-create scalable and impactful innovations.
Despite the proven benefits of NBS, their adoption in agriculture remains slow due to limited awareness, complexity, and a lack of decision-support tools. Farmers, researchers, and policymakers need practical, data-driven solutions to integrate NBS into real-world farming systems. Key outcomes included AI-driven geo spatial analysis, agent-based modeling, and interactive NBS toolkits, all aimed at improving nutrient efficiency, biodiversity, and ecosystem resilience. The hackathon also played a crucial role in strengthening international cooperation, particularly between Europe and China, by facilitating knowledge exchange and setting the stage for future joint initiatives in sustainable agriculture. Beyond generating innovative solutions, the hackathon empowered participants by expanding their skills and professional networks. It provided hands-on experience with cutting-edge technologies, encouraged interdisciplinary problem-solving, and raised awareness about the importance of NBS in modern farming. By combining technology, research, and stakeholder engagement, the event contributed to shaping policy, research, and practice, ensuring that sustainable nutrient management becomes a core element of future agricultural systems.
Additional information
The hackathon began with a Call for Challenges, inviting researchers and practitioners to define key problems related to nutrient efficiency, biodiversity, and ecosystem resilience. This was followed by a Call for Participants, attracting a diverse mix of students, researchers, and professionals. Throughout the Hacking Phase, teams collaborated with expert mentors, leveraging open data and technical support to refine their solutions.
The event concluded with a Final Evaluation, where a jury assessed projects based on innovation, impact, feasibility, and scalability. The winning solutions addressed critical agricultural challenges. The Gold-winning team developed an agent-based modelling tool to assess NBS adoption in different farming contexts, aiding policymakers and researchers. The Silver-winning team applied AI-driven geospatial analysis to enhance rural development and precision farming, improving land-use planning and nutrient management. The Bronze-winning team created an interactive NBS demonstration toolkit, bridging the gap between scientific knowledge and practical application through hands-on experiments. Other projects focused on cloud-free crop monitoring, high-precision meteorological forecasting, and regional nutrient balance modelling, all contributing to trans4num’s goal of enhancing agricultural sustainability.
On the trans4num dedicated Hackathon page you will find more information about the challenges and the mentors, as well as the final reports from the trans4num INSPIRE Hackathon teams.
The trans4num INSPIRE Hackathon 2024 fostered innovation and collaboration in sustainable nutrient management, integrating Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) with digital tools to strengthen research-practice connections and international cooperation. The trans4num INSPIRE Hackathon 2024 accelerated innovation in sustainable nutrient management by fostering collaboration between farmers, researchers, and technology experts. It provided a platform for developing and testing practical solutions, ensuring that NBS and digital tools could be effectively applied in real agricultural settings. The event helped bridge the gap between scientific research and practice, enabling participants to co-create scalable and impactful innovations.
Despite the proven benefits of NBS, their adoption in agriculture remains slow due to limited awareness, complexity, and a lack of decision-support tools. Farmers, researchers, and policymakers need practical, data-driven solutions to integrate NBS into real-world farming systems. Key outcomes included AI-driven geo spatial analysis, agent-based modeling, and interactive NBS toolkits, all aimed at improving nutrient efficiency, biodiversity, and ecosystem resilience. The hackathon also played a crucial role in strengthening international cooperation, particularly between Europe and China, by facilitating knowledge exchange and setting the stage for future joint initiatives in sustainable agriculture. Beyond generating innovative solutions, the hackathon empowered participants by expanding their skills and professional networks. It provided hands-on experience with cutting-edge technologies, encouraged interdisciplinary problem-solving, and raised awareness about the importance of NBS in modern farming. By combining technology, research, and stakeholder engagement, the event contributed to shaping policy, research, and practice, ensuring that sustainable nutrient management becomes a core element of future agricultural systems.
Additional information
The hackathon began with a Call for Challenges, inviting researchers and practitioners to define key problems related to nutrient efficiency, biodiversity, and ecosystem resilience. This was followed by a Call for Participants, attracting a diverse mix of students, researchers, and professionals. Throughout the Hacking Phase, teams collaborated with expert mentors, leveraging open data and technical support to refine their solutions.
The event concluded with a Final Evaluation, where a jury assessed projects based on innovation, impact, feasibility, and scalability. The winning solutions addressed critical agricultural challenges. The Gold-winning team developed an agent-based modelling tool to assess NBS adoption in different farming contexts, aiding policymakers and researchers. The Silver-winning team applied AI-driven geospatial analysis to enhance rural development and precision farming, improving land-use planning and nutrient management. The Bronze-winning team created an interactive NBS demonstration toolkit, bridging the gap between scientific knowledge and practical application through hands-on experiments. Other projects focused on cloud-free crop monitoring, high-precision meteorological forecasting, and regional nutrient balance modelling, all contributing to trans4num’s goal of enhancing agricultural sustainability.
On the trans4num dedicated Hackathon page you will find more information about the challenges and the mentors, as well as the final reports from the trans4num INSPIRE Hackathon teams.
Cut-and-carry green manure systems are increasingly promoted as plant-based alternatives to chemical fertilizers in nutrient management strategies. This study evaluates the impacts of such systems on seed potato yield, soil health, and nutrient cycling in Northern Netherlands. Despite short-term improvements in soil structure and microbial diversity, long-term results reveal challenges in maintaining nutrient availability for crops.
There is growing pressure to reduce chemical fertilizer use due to environmental risks and resource scarcity. Nature-based solutions (NBS), such as plant-based manures, can support more circular nutrient flows, especially where animal manure is unavailable. However, it remains unclear how complete substitution with green manure affects soil function and crop yield, especially under nutrient-deficient conditions. This long-term field trial tested a system relying entirely on cut- and carry-green manure and crop rotation. Results were compared to conventional systems using chemical or animal manure-based fertilization. We assessed soil nutrient profiles, microbial dynamics, and calculated soil health scores.
Cut-and-carry green manure systems can contribute to more circular and plant-based nutrient management, especially in areas where animal manure isn’t available. In our field trials, applying clover silage improved soil structure early in the growing season and boosted microbial diversity. The system also showed potential for carbon and nitrogen fixation, which are important for building long-term soil fertility.
However, the full replacement of chemical fertilizer with plant-based inputs brought some challenges. Nutrients were not always available when the potato crop needed them most, and competition between soil microbes and plants likely reduced nutrient uptake. As a result, yields were lower and soil health declined by the end of the season.
Additional information
Our research pilot explored whether a fully plant-based fertilization system could match or replace conventional methods in terms of soil health and crop yield. The trial was carried out on long-term organic seed potato fields in the north of the Netherlands (Munnikenzijl) and included four systems:
- A conventional system using chemical fertilizers (CF)
- An organic system with goat manure and cattle slurry (COF)
- A plant-based system using only cut-and-carry clover (POF)
- The same plant-based system with additional compost (POFC).
Over one year with two time points (before planting and just before harvest), we measured yield, soil nutrient availability, microbial activity, and soil structure. The plant-based systems performed well in some areas: they improved microbial diversity and showed higher potential for nitrogen fixation.
They also enhanced early soil aggregation. However, nutrient availability during crop growth was a challenge, especially for phosphorus. The full replacement of chemical or animal-based fertilizer resulted in lower potato yields and lower soil health scores after harvest. Compost helped improve outcomes slightly but didn’t fully close the gap. These findings suggest that while cut-and-carry green manure can support nature-based nutrient strategies, they may not be sufficient on their own—especially in nutrient-poor soils.
Challenges
- Nutrient release didn’t match crop demand, especially during the later growth stages
- Timing of application was difficult to optimize, as organic inputs decomposed quickly in early spring, releasing nutrients before the crop could use them
- Different potato varieties were used in conventional and organic systems, which is realistic for practice but complicates direct comparisons of outcomes
Resources
- Land for dedicated cut-and-carry green manure production
- Access to high-quality compost to balance nutrient supply
- Equipment to apply and incorporate organic material efficiently
- Soil and weather monitoring to better time applications
Cut-and-carry green manure systems are increasingly promoted as plant-based alternatives to chemical fertilizers in nutrient management strategies. This study evaluates the impacts of such systems on seed potato yield, soil health, and nutrient cycling in Northern Netherlands. Despite short-term improvements in soil structure and microbial diversity, long-term results reveal challenges in maintaining nutrient availability for crops.
There is growing pressure to reduce chemical fertilizer use due to environmental risks and resource scarcity. Nature-based solutions (NBS), such as plant-based manures, can support more circular nutrient flows, especially where animal manure is unavailable. However, it remains unclear how complete substitution with green manure affects soil function and crop yield, especially under nutrient-deficient conditions. This long-term field trial tested a system relying entirely on cut- and carry-green manure and crop rotation. Results were compared to conventional systems using chemical or animal manure-based fertilization. We assessed soil nutrient profiles, microbial dynamics, and calculated soil health scores.
Cut-and-carry green manure systems can contribute to more circular and plant-based nutrient management, especially in areas where animal manure isn’t available. In our field trials, applying clover silage improved soil structure early in the growing season and boosted microbial diversity. The system also showed potential for carbon and nitrogen fixation, which are important for building long-term soil fertility.
However, the full replacement of chemical fertilizer with plant-based inputs brought some challenges. Nutrients were not always available when the potato crop needed them most, and competition between soil microbes and plants likely reduced nutrient uptake. As a result, yields were lower and soil health declined by the end of the season.
Additional information
Our research pilot explored whether a fully plant-based fertilization system could match or replace conventional methods in terms of soil health and crop yield. The trial was carried out on long-term organic seed potato fields in the north of the Netherlands (Munnikenzijl) and included four systems:
- A conventional system using chemical fertilizers (CF)
- An organic system with goat manure and cattle slurry (COF)
- A plant-based system using only cut-and-carry clover (POF)
- The same plant-based system with additional compost (POFC).
Over one year with two time points (before planting and just before harvest), we measured yield, soil nutrient availability, microbial activity, and soil structure. The plant-based systems performed well in some areas: they improved microbial diversity and showed higher potential for nitrogen fixation.
They also enhanced early soil aggregation. However, nutrient availability during crop growth was a challenge, especially for phosphorus. The full replacement of chemical or animal-based fertilizer resulted in lower potato yields and lower soil health scores after harvest. Compost helped improve outcomes slightly but didn’t fully close the gap. These findings suggest that while cut-and-carry green manure can support nature-based nutrient strategies, they may not be sufficient on their own—especially in nutrient-poor soils.
Challenges
- Nutrient release didn’t match crop demand, especially during the later growth stages
- Timing of application was difficult to optimize, as organic inputs decomposed quickly in early spring, releasing nutrients before the crop could use them
- Different potato varieties were used in conventional and organic systems, which is realistic for practice but complicates direct comparisons of outcomes
Resources
- Land for dedicated cut-and-carry green manure production
- Access to high-quality compost to balance nutrient supply
- Equipment to apply and incorporate organic material efficiently
- Soil and weather monitoring to better time applications
A decline in the population of many bird species has been observed (Eurostat 2020). A good opposite example is the common kestrel in the southern part of Hungary (Baranya-county), where the farmers, nature conservation experts and the ornithologists protects the kestrel population with combined forces, for a decade now.
One of the major challenges for crop farmers(mostly for no-till, min till farmers) is the increasingly widespread common vole (microtus arvalis). In the latest years their presence was a deterring factor in many farmers yields. Due to the climatic changes, no tillage agriculture and the regulatory environment, their numbers skyrocketed, often leading to the formation of a gradation. (D. Roos, 2019). By cause of intensive agriculture, the number of field protecting tree strips is decreasing. That’s affecting the kestrel population negatively since they don’t build their own nests, mostly occupying nests built by different crow species.
The best solution that is also proved by many researches is to install nesting crates for the common kestrel. As mentioned before they aren’t building their own nests and they are very exposed to the environmental changes (E. Baltag, 2014). Our solution is to provide artificial nests for them to nest successfully. According to the report of the Foundation on Nature Values of Baranya, after installing the kestrel boxes, there has been a rapid growth in the population indicating that the local problem was mainly caused by a lack of nesting sites. Another nature based solution regarding this topic is a biological rodent management. The kestrel is a natural predator to the common vole. The larger the kestrel population, the better they can control the vole population, which means farmers can use less rodenticide, which is essential for sustainable farming.
Additional information
- The biggest challenge is to get the different AKIS members to be open to working together, to listen to each other's perspectives and to develop a common plan of action.
- The willingness of the involved parties to cooperate is as important as a resource as it is as a challenge. Good communication between them is essential. In addition to these two very important resources, cooperation will also need funds to finance the project.
The benefits
This co-operation - started by the Foundation on Nature Values of Baranya (FNVB) - shows that different AKIS members, with different goals in mind (foundations, farmers, companies) can work together smoothly. It’s a great example set by the parties involved. Crop farmers benefit greatly from the increase in kestrel populations for rodent control. It is a well-known fact, that kestrels can be a great help against various pests, for example the common vole. The consumption of breeding pairs and broods reduces the damage caused by the rodents. (FNVB, 2024). Another great asset of the birds is their role as natures indicators (Lederer 2020), and by monitoring them we can see that their annual population, and the success of the breeding season are indicative of the population trends of the common vole (FNVB, 2024).
A decline in the population of many bird species has been observed (Eurostat 2020). A good opposite example is the common kestrel in the southern part of Hungary (Baranya-county), where the farmers, nature conservation experts and the ornithologists protects the kestrel population with combined forces, for a decade now.
One of the major challenges for crop farmers(mostly for no-till, min till farmers) is the increasingly widespread common vole (microtus arvalis). In the latest years their presence was a deterring factor in many farmers yields. Due to the climatic changes, no tillage agriculture and the regulatory environment, their numbers skyrocketed, often leading to the formation of a gradation. (D. Roos, 2019). By cause of intensive agriculture, the number of field protecting tree strips is decreasing. That’s affecting the kestrel population negatively since they don’t build their own nests, mostly occupying nests built by different crow species.
The best solution that is also proved by many researches is to install nesting crates for the common kestrel. As mentioned before they aren’t building their own nests and they are very exposed to the environmental changes (E. Baltag, 2014). Our solution is to provide artificial nests for them to nest successfully. According to the report of the Foundation on Nature Values of Baranya, after installing the kestrel boxes, there has been a rapid growth in the population indicating that the local problem was mainly caused by a lack of nesting sites. Another nature based solution regarding this topic is a biological rodent management. The kestrel is a natural predator to the common vole. The larger the kestrel population, the better they can control the vole population, which means farmers can use less rodenticide, which is essential for sustainable farming.
Additional information
- The biggest challenge is to get the different AKIS members to be open to working together, to listen to each other's perspectives and to develop a common plan of action.
- The willingness of the involved parties to cooperate is as important as a resource as it is as a challenge. Good communication between them is essential. In addition to these two very important resources, cooperation will also need funds to finance the project.
The benefits
This co-operation - started by the Foundation on Nature Values of Baranya (FNVB) - shows that different AKIS members, with different goals in mind (foundations, farmers, companies) can work together smoothly. It’s a great example set by the parties involved. Crop farmers benefit greatly from the increase in kestrel populations for rodent control. It is a well-known fact, that kestrels can be a great help against various pests, for example the common vole. The consumption of breeding pairs and broods reduces the damage caused by the rodents. (FNVB, 2024). Another great asset of the birds is their role as natures indicators (Lederer 2020), and by monitoring them we can see that their annual population, and the success of the breeding season are indicative of the population trends of the common vole (FNVB, 2024).
Grass refining turns green crops into high-value protein, feed, and bio-based materials. trans4num supports this climate-friendly approach to boost soil health, reduce emissions, and strengthen circular farming in Denmark and beyond.
Denmark's agricultural sector faces pressing environmental challenges—including nutrient surpluses, biodiversity loss, and oxygen depletion in inland waters. These issues are exacerbated by high levels of greenhouse gas emissions from conventional farming practices. To address these impacts while maintaining high food production, there's a growing need for regenerative agricultural systems that are both economically viable and ecologically sustainable.
This calls for a fundamental restructuring of how we grow food, use land, and manage nutrients. Green leafy crops such as grass, clover, Lucerne, and nettle represent a promising solution. These crops not only thrive in Danish conditions, but also:
- Provide some of the highest protein yields per hectare
- Require no pesticide use
- Help store carbon and reduce nutrient leaching when grown continuously on the same land
At the same time, the global demand for sustainable protein sources is increasing—making the case stronger for transitioning to nature-based, locally adaptable food and feed systems.
Benefits
Climate and Environmental Gains: Grass absorbs nutrients effectively and reduces nitrogen leaching. Long-term cultivation stores more carbon in the soil. Grass is pesticide-free, which supports soil microbial life and protects groundwater.
Biodiversity and Water Protection: Green leafy crops (including those often seen as weeds) help preserve water quality and biodiversity in inland ecosystems like lakes and streams.
Farm Productivity: Refining boosts the utility of farmland—protein is used for feed (poultry, pigs, cattle), while pulp and brown juice open additional value streams. Farmers gain more from the same land area.
Additional information
What is Green Biorefining?
Green biorefineries work much like potato starch factories, using mechanical and thermal processes to separate plant components. Here's how it works:
- Leafy crops are pressed to extract green juice.
- This juice is heated (60–80°C) to precipitate protein.
- The resulting protein-rich paste is dried into a green powder (for animal feed) or further processed into a white protein fraction (for food).
What Happens to the Rest?
Brown juice: Contains sugars and bioactive substances. Potential uses include:
- Fermentation cultures
- Biogas production
- Natural fertilizers
- Medical and industrial applications
Pulp (press cake): Still rich in nutrients and fiber. It can be:
- Fed to cattle, horses, and other livestock
- Used for textiles, paper, or insulation
- Further processed for biogas or bio-based materials
Green refining becomes even more efficient when farmers and refineries work together. This ensures that:
- Crops are cultivated and harvested in sync with processing capacity
- Surplus biomass is redirected to livestock or alternative uses
- Nutrient flows are optimized across farming communities
This model of shared planning and logistics reflects the collaborative DNA of Danish agriculture, helping maximize both ecological and economic returns.
Grass refining turns green crops into high-value protein, feed, and bio-based materials. trans4num supports this climate-friendly approach to boost soil health, reduce emissions, and strengthen circular farming in Denmark and beyond.
Denmark's agricultural sector faces pressing environmental challenges—including nutrient surpluses, biodiversity loss, and oxygen depletion in inland waters. These issues are exacerbated by high levels of greenhouse gas emissions from conventional farming practices. To address these impacts while maintaining high food production, there's a growing need for regenerative agricultural systems that are both economically viable and ecologically sustainable.
This calls for a fundamental restructuring of how we grow food, use land, and manage nutrients. Green leafy crops such as grass, clover, Lucerne, and nettle represent a promising solution. These crops not only thrive in Danish conditions, but also:
- Provide some of the highest protein yields per hectare
- Require no pesticide use
- Help store carbon and reduce nutrient leaching when grown continuously on the same land
At the same time, the global demand for sustainable protein sources is increasing—making the case stronger for transitioning to nature-based, locally adaptable food and feed systems.
Benefits
Climate and Environmental Gains: Grass absorbs nutrients effectively and reduces nitrogen leaching. Long-term cultivation stores more carbon in the soil. Grass is pesticide-free, which supports soil microbial life and protects groundwater.
Biodiversity and Water Protection: Green leafy crops (including those often seen as weeds) help preserve water quality and biodiversity in inland ecosystems like lakes and streams.
Farm Productivity: Refining boosts the utility of farmland—protein is used for feed (poultry, pigs, cattle), while pulp and brown juice open additional value streams. Farmers gain more from the same land area.
Additional information
What is Green Biorefining?
Green biorefineries work much like potato starch factories, using mechanical and thermal processes to separate plant components. Here's how it works:
- Leafy crops are pressed to extract green juice.
- This juice is heated (60–80°C) to precipitate protein.
- The resulting protein-rich paste is dried into a green powder (for animal feed) or further processed into a white protein fraction (for food).
What Happens to the Rest?
Brown juice: Contains sugars and bioactive substances. Potential uses include:
- Fermentation cultures
- Biogas production
- Natural fertilizers
- Medical and industrial applications
Pulp (press cake): Still rich in nutrients and fiber. It can be:
- Fed to cattle, horses, and other livestock
- Used for textiles, paper, or insulation
- Further processed for biogas or bio-based materials
Green refining becomes even more efficient when farmers and refineries work together. This ensures that:
- Crops are cultivated and harvested in sync with processing capacity
- Surplus biomass is redirected to livestock or alternative uses
- Nutrient flows are optimized across farming communities
This model of shared planning and logistics reflects the collaborative DNA of Danish agriculture, helping maximize both ecological and economic returns.
Replacing traditional feed crops with perennial grasses in intensively farmed regions can benefit both terrestrial and aquatic environments, increase biodiversity, and help mitigate GHG emissions. Advancing biorefinery production and supply chains could create incentives for farmers to shift their cropping rotations towards more grass-based systems. Poor ecological status of aquatic environments, low biodiversity, and loss of soil carbon are significant challenges associated with high-intensity agriculture. With agriculture covering about 62% of the landscape, the agricultural sector in Denmark is no exception. Cereals and maize account for 52% and 7% of the Danish cropping area, respectively, making the agricultural landscape dominated by monoculture feed crops with a relatively high environmental impact. As an alternative, perennial grasses, when managed properly, can improve nutrient use efficiency, enhance soil carbon storage, and reduce the negative impact of farming on biodiversity.
The substitution of grass on cereal and maize field scan yield a new source of protein through protein extraction from grass through the biorefinery. In the biorefinery grass is pressed producing a green juice and a fiber fraction. From the green juice, protein is extracted through heating or steaming and can be fed directly to monogastric animals - thereby replacing the less sustainable soya feed. The fiber fraction can be fed to ruminants (e.g. cattle) or distributed to the biogas plant. In addition, the biogas plant also receives manure etc. from the field, and the energy produced here can be transferred to run the biorefinery. The biogas remnants including potentially produced biochar finally is recycled back to the local fields as fertilizer and/or to promote carbon storage in the soil, thereby contributing to circularity of the system.
Additional information
Aarhus University is investigating the benefits of incorporating more perennial grasses into crop rotations, focusing on both production-specific aspects (biomass yield, protein content, etc.) and environmental factors within a landscape context (nutrient leaching, biodiversity, and climate).
The success of the landscape transformation towards increased grass cultivation depends both on knowledge on how benefits of the grass varies across the landscape and on active and positive engagement of stakeholders. Therefore, our research integrates various elements of landscape scale effects of the grass and stakeholder involvement to gain insight into their perspectives and to disseminate knowledge about the benefits of adopting this production practice.
In Denmark farmers are regulated based on - amongst others - the N retention map. This map is specific for Denmark and depicts the geographically varying sensitivity of how much N is retained in the soil before it reaches the recipient – the fjord. Hence, there is a spatially varying effect of how effective the grass is as a solution. From a farmer’s perspective, this can facilitate discussion and potentially increased collaboration between actors of the landscape.
Challenges
- Economic and financial barriers, e.g., substantial investments and market uncertainties
- Supply chain infrastructure gaps and fixed processing capacity requires significant coordination
- Farmer resistance, e.g. due to risk aversion and lack of incentives and information
- Lack of policies and regulatory schemes to effectively support establishment
- Technological gaps in the supply and production chain e.g. side stream valorisation
- Environmental variability – difference in mitigation potential across the landscape
Replacing traditional feed crops with perennial grasses in intensively farmed regions can benefit both terrestrial and aquatic environments, increase biodiversity, and help mitigate GHG emissions. Advancing biorefinery production and supply chains could create incentives for farmers to shift their cropping rotations towards more grass-based systems. Poor ecological status of aquatic environments, low biodiversity, and loss of soil carbon are significant challenges associated with high-intensity agriculture. With agriculture covering about 62% of the landscape, the agricultural sector in Denmark is no exception. Cereals and maize account for 52% and 7% of the Danish cropping area, respectively, making the agricultural landscape dominated by monoculture feed crops with a relatively high environmental impact. As an alternative, perennial grasses, when managed properly, can improve nutrient use efficiency, enhance soil carbon storage, and reduce the negative impact of farming on biodiversity.
The substitution of grass on cereal and maize field scan yield a new source of protein through protein extraction from grass through the biorefinery. In the biorefinery grass is pressed producing a green juice and a fiber fraction. From the green juice, protein is extracted through heating or steaming and can be fed directly to monogastric animals - thereby replacing the less sustainable soya feed. The fiber fraction can be fed to ruminants (e.g. cattle) or distributed to the biogas plant. In addition, the biogas plant also receives manure etc. from the field, and the energy produced here can be transferred to run the biorefinery. The biogas remnants including potentially produced biochar finally is recycled back to the local fields as fertilizer and/or to promote carbon storage in the soil, thereby contributing to circularity of the system.
Additional information
Aarhus University is investigating the benefits of incorporating more perennial grasses into crop rotations, focusing on both production-specific aspects (biomass yield, protein content, etc.) and environmental factors within a landscape context (nutrient leaching, biodiversity, and climate).
The success of the landscape transformation towards increased grass cultivation depends both on knowledge on how benefits of the grass varies across the landscape and on active and positive engagement of stakeholders. Therefore, our research integrates various elements of landscape scale effects of the grass and stakeholder involvement to gain insight into their perspectives and to disseminate knowledge about the benefits of adopting this production practice.
In Denmark farmers are regulated based on - amongst others - the N retention map. This map is specific for Denmark and depicts the geographically varying sensitivity of how much N is retained in the soil before it reaches the recipient – the fjord. Hence, there is a spatially varying effect of how effective the grass is as a solution. From a farmer’s perspective, this can facilitate discussion and potentially increased collaboration between actors of the landscape.
Challenges
- Economic and financial barriers, e.g., substantial investments and market uncertainties
- Supply chain infrastructure gaps and fixed processing capacity requires significant coordination
- Farmer resistance, e.g. due to risk aversion and lack of incentives and information
- Lack of policies and regulatory schemes to effectively support establishment
- Technological gaps in the supply and production chain e.g. side stream valorisation
- Environmental variability – difference in mitigation potential across the landscape
There is a growing need for research into alternative fertilization methods in grain cultivation. Conventional farming typically uses a combination of synthetic fertilizer and a second application of slurry. In organic farming, fully animal-based fertilizers are more commonly used. The challenges differ between the two systems. Organic farming already relies largely on circular fertilizers, but the availability of animal manure is limited, creating a demand for alternative sources. In conventional farming, linear (non-renewable) fertilizers are still widely used, accounting for about 50% of total fertilizer input. The key challenge here is reducing dependence on these inputs. Fertilizer price shave risen sharply in recent years, and concerns about nutrient leaching into surface water are becoming increasingly urgent. A potential solution for both systems could be increased use of plant-based fertilizers, such as alfalfa or grass pellets.
The use of plant-based fertilizers offers a major opportunity to reduce chemical fertilizer use in conventional farming. Additionally, it can help lower the use of animal manure in both conventional and organic grain cultivation. By introducing this third fertilization option, farmers become less dependent on synthetic and/or animal-based fertilizers. The use of more natural products is also expected to improve soil biodiversity, which in turn supports better soil health.
Grain farming often operates on tight margins, so rising fertilizer costs can have a significant impact on profitability. At the same time, the Netherlands faces a pressing challenge to improve water quality, an issue in which the agricultural sector plays a key role. Regulations on fertilizer use are becoming increasingly strict. The need to maintain yields while also improving water quality is urgent. Using plant-based fertilizers to help prevent nutrient leaching is a practical and forward-looking solution that fits well within the operations of many farms.
Additional information
We are testing whether the standard fertilization in both organic and conventional winter wheat cultivation can be fully or partially replaced by alfalfa and/or grass pellets. We are examining different application rates and timings. Soil samples are taken from the fields before and after the growing season to measure how much nitrogen and other nutrients remain in the soil. Throughout the season, crop development is monitored, focusing on plant growth, common diseases, ripening, and lodging. At the end of the season, yield and grain quality are assessed, including moisture content, protein level, Zeleny index, hectoliter weight, and starch content. The pellets used in the trials have been analyzed beforehand for their nutrient composition, which determines the appropriate application rate.
Each year, the different treatments are compared. After four years of research, we aim to provide a well-founded recommendation on the advantages and disadvantages of using plant-based pellets compared to current standard fertilization practices in both organic and conventional winter wheat farming.
Challenges
- Evaluating how Lucerne and grass pellets perform compared to conventional fertilizers in terms of yield and nutrient availability
- Reducing reliance on synthetic fertilizers
- Identifying the tangible agronomic benefits of using Lucerne and grass pellets on different soil types and crop systems
- Understanding the residual effects of Lucerne and grass pellets on subsequent crops, including cover crops and main crops
- Assessing whether plant-based fertilizers contribute to increased weed pressure in the field
- Determining the impact of plant-based fertilizers like grass-clover on soil biological activity and soil health
Resources
- Sufficient availability of plant-based alfalfa and/or grass pellets
- Possibility to apply the pellets early in the season onto the crop
- Knowledge of soil nutrient levels through soil sampling, in order to determine the correct fertilization dosage.
There is a growing need for research into alternative fertilization methods in grain cultivation. Conventional farming typically uses a combination of synthetic fertilizer and a second application of slurry. In organic farming, fully animal-based fertilizers are more commonly used. The challenges differ between the two systems. Organic farming already relies largely on circular fertilizers, but the availability of animal manure is limited, creating a demand for alternative sources. In conventional farming, linear (non-renewable) fertilizers are still widely used, accounting for about 50% of total fertilizer input. The key challenge here is reducing dependence on these inputs. Fertilizer price shave risen sharply in recent years, and concerns about nutrient leaching into surface water are becoming increasingly urgent. A potential solution for both systems could be increased use of plant-based fertilizers, such as alfalfa or grass pellets.
The use of plant-based fertilizers offers a major opportunity to reduce chemical fertilizer use in conventional farming. Additionally, it can help lower the use of animal manure in both conventional and organic grain cultivation. By introducing this third fertilization option, farmers become less dependent on synthetic and/or animal-based fertilizers. The use of more natural products is also expected to improve soil biodiversity, which in turn supports better soil health.
Grain farming often operates on tight margins, so rising fertilizer costs can have a significant impact on profitability. At the same time, the Netherlands faces a pressing challenge to improve water quality, an issue in which the agricultural sector plays a key role. Regulations on fertilizer use are becoming increasingly strict. The need to maintain yields while also improving water quality is urgent. Using plant-based fertilizers to help prevent nutrient leaching is a practical and forward-looking solution that fits well within the operations of many farms.
Additional information
We are testing whether the standard fertilization in both organic and conventional winter wheat cultivation can be fully or partially replaced by alfalfa and/or grass pellets. We are examining different application rates and timings. Soil samples are taken from the fields before and after the growing season to measure how much nitrogen and other nutrients remain in the soil. Throughout the season, crop development is monitored, focusing on plant growth, common diseases, ripening, and lodging. At the end of the season, yield and grain quality are assessed, including moisture content, protein level, Zeleny index, hectoliter weight, and starch content. The pellets used in the trials have been analyzed beforehand for their nutrient composition, which determines the appropriate application rate.
Each year, the different treatments are compared. After four years of research, we aim to provide a well-founded recommendation on the advantages and disadvantages of using plant-based pellets compared to current standard fertilization practices in both organic and conventional winter wheat farming.
Challenges
- Evaluating how Lucerne and grass pellets perform compared to conventional fertilizers in terms of yield and nutrient availability
- Reducing reliance on synthetic fertilizers
- Identifying the tangible agronomic benefits of using Lucerne and grass pellets on different soil types and crop systems
- Understanding the residual effects of Lucerne and grass pellets on subsequent crops, including cover crops and main crops
- Assessing whether plant-based fertilizers contribute to increased weed pressure in the field
- Determining the impact of plant-based fertilizers like grass-clover on soil biological activity and soil health
Resources
- Sufficient availability of plant-based alfalfa and/or grass pellets
- Possibility to apply the pellets early in the season onto the crop
- Knowledge of soil nutrient levels through soil sampling, in order to determine the correct fertilization dosage.
Soil profile demonstrations are vital because soil remains a "black box" for many farmers. While the benefits of Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) are real, they often lie hidden below the surface. By analyzing soil profiles, we make these benefits visible—providing farmers with clear, tangible proof that sustainable practices improve soil health and fertility. This hands-on approach shows how different management techniques affect root growth, microbial activity, and soil structure. Farmers often judge soil by surface signs, which can be misleading. Digging deeper reveals the true impact of practices, helping them see the changes beneath their feet. Soil profile demonstrations turn abstract science into visible, practical knowledge. By making the invisible visible, we empower farmers to make better decisions that support long-term sustainability.
Empirical understanding is key to changing farming practices. Soil profile demonstrations offer visual proof of improvements like better structure, more organic matter, and higher water retention. Farmers see how cover crops, reduced tillage, and manure improve soil health—benefits often hidden from the surface. By revealing real results, demonstrations bridge the gap between science and practice, building trust in NBS. Farmers observe changes in porosity, root growth, and biological activity, strengthening the link between practices and soil quality. This boosts confidence in adopting and maintaining sustainable methods. Soil profiles also support peer learning, encouraging collaboration and shared knowledge. When farmers can see the long-term value of NBS, they’re more likely to make informed choices that support soil, yield, and resilience—advancing the shift to regenerative agriculture.
Additional information
As part of a trans4num event, we conducted soil profile investigations to reveal variations within fields. By digging soil pits, we uncovered differences in composition—such as gravel layers in one area and rich, humus-rich topsoil in another—highlighting the importance of site-specific soil management. These hands-on demonstrations helped farmers directly observe the impact of Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) on soil health. Participants saw how sustainable practices affect root growth, soil stability, and water retention. This visual, tactile experience reinforced their understanding of how soil evolves under NBS and boosted confidence in applying regenerative practices. By linking soil characteristics to past management, farmers could better tailor their strategies for improved outcomes. Trans4num events serve as a platform for experiential learning, turning scientific knowledge into practical insight. These shared experiences strengthen peer learning, motivate sustainable action, and support the wider adoption of site-adapted regenerative agriculture.
Challenges
Implementing soil profile demonstrations can be difficult due to weather conditions like heavy rain or drought, which hinder accurate analysis. Timing is crucial, as farmers are busy during peak seasons. Engagement is also a challenge, requiring strong communication and clear evidence of benefits to gain farmers' interest.
Resources
Successful implementation requires good planning to ensure the right timing and location. Strong networks with farmers, advisors, and agronomists support knowledge-sharing. Expertise and proper equipment are essential, as soil scientists help interpret results and provide valuable recommendations for farmers.
Soil profile demonstrations are vital because soil remains a "black box" for many farmers. While the benefits of Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) are real, they often lie hidden below the surface. By analyzing soil profiles, we make these benefits visible—providing farmers with clear, tangible proof that sustainable practices improve soil health and fertility. This hands-on approach shows how different management techniques affect root growth, microbial activity, and soil structure. Farmers often judge soil by surface signs, which can be misleading. Digging deeper reveals the true impact of practices, helping them see the changes beneath their feet. Soil profile demonstrations turn abstract science into visible, practical knowledge. By making the invisible visible, we empower farmers to make better decisions that support long-term sustainability.
Empirical understanding is key to changing farming practices. Soil profile demonstrations offer visual proof of improvements like better structure, more organic matter, and higher water retention. Farmers see how cover crops, reduced tillage, and manure improve soil health—benefits often hidden from the surface. By revealing real results, demonstrations bridge the gap between science and practice, building trust in NBS. Farmers observe changes in porosity, root growth, and biological activity, strengthening the link between practices and soil quality. This boosts confidence in adopting and maintaining sustainable methods. Soil profiles also support peer learning, encouraging collaboration and shared knowledge. When farmers can see the long-term value of NBS, they’re more likely to make informed choices that support soil, yield, and resilience—advancing the shift to regenerative agriculture.
Additional information
As part of a trans4num event, we conducted soil profile investigations to reveal variations within fields. By digging soil pits, we uncovered differences in composition—such as gravel layers in one area and rich, humus-rich topsoil in another—highlighting the importance of site-specific soil management. These hands-on demonstrations helped farmers directly observe the impact of Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) on soil health. Participants saw how sustainable practices affect root growth, soil stability, and water retention. This visual, tactile experience reinforced their understanding of how soil evolves under NBS and boosted confidence in applying regenerative practices. By linking soil characteristics to past management, farmers could better tailor their strategies for improved outcomes. Trans4num events serve as a platform for experiential learning, turning scientific knowledge into practical insight. These shared experiences strengthen peer learning, motivate sustainable action, and support the wider adoption of site-adapted regenerative agriculture.
Challenges
Implementing soil profile demonstrations can be difficult due to weather conditions like heavy rain or drought, which hinder accurate analysis. Timing is crucial, as farmers are busy during peak seasons. Engagement is also a challenge, requiring strong communication and clear evidence of benefits to gain farmers' interest.
Resources
Successful implementation requires good planning to ensure the right timing and location. Strong networks with farmers, advisors, and agronomists support knowledge-sharing. Expertise and proper equipment are essential, as soil scientists help interpret results and provide valuable recommendations for farmers.
Nature-based solutions (NBS) aim to address societal and environmental challenges through the sustainable use of nature. However, their design and implementation require robust, continuous environmental data to guide planning and assess effectiveness. Traditional field-based monitoring is often too costly, time-consuming, or spatially limited to provide the required information at scale. Remote sensing bridges this gap by offering consistent, spatially explicit, and regularly updated environmental data. It supports the early identification of priority intervention areas, baseline assessments, and long-term impact monitoring. In a changing climate, where adaptive management is crucial, these capabilities are essential to the resilience and success of NBS.
Remote sensing supports NBS implementation in multiple strategic ways:
- Scalability – Satellite data enables consistent monitoring across cities, regions, or countries, helping planners prioritize based on ecosystem trends.
- Repeatability – Frequent data acquisition supports tracking seasonal dynamics, vegetation cycles, and ecological responses to NBS.
- Cost-efficiency – Open-access platforms like Copernicus (Sentinel) and Landsat lower monitoring costs and expand stakeholder access.
- Integration potential – Combining remote sensing with field surveys, IoT, or modeling improves multi-source environmental assessment.
- Transparency – Public data fosters accountability and trust through visual, data-driven reporting.
- Indicator tracking – Supports monitoring of indicators like NDVI, land surface temperature, water availability, and urban heat island effects.
- Climate resilience – Time-series analysis informs adaptive strategies by identifying long-term environmental trends.
- Risk assessment – Enables early detection of stressors like drought, flooding, or degradation, supporting timely NBS responses.
Additional information
Within trans4num, a dedicated Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) site in Hungary demonstrates how remote sensing supports sustainable land management. The site applies drone monitoring and GIS to track land cover, vegetation health, and water dynamics, enabling adaptive management and long-term impact assessment. Drones provide high-resolution data and flexibility, complementing satellites by filling spatial and temporal gaps. The approach emphasizes accessibility using open tools like QGIS and Google Earth Engine, and low-cost drone tech to support uptake by small municipalities or civil groups. Capacity-building is central, with trainings and workshops enabling stakeholders to collect, process, and interpret spatial data. The NBS site serves as a practical, scalable model of how geospatial tools and collaboration can advance effective and inclusive nature-based solutions.
Challenges
- Expert knowledge is required to interpret remote sensing data
- Cloud cover limits the usability of optical satellite imagery
- Technical and financial barriers hinder small stakeholders' access
- Data integration issues affect consistency across different sources
- Institutional gaps and regulations can delay effective implementation
Resources
- Open or commercial satellite imagery for regular environmental monitoring
- GIS and image processing software like QGIS or GEE
- Trained personnel with expertise in remote sensing and analysis
- Sufficient computing infrastructure for data storage and processing
- Institutional support to integrate results into decision-making processes
Nature-based solutions (NBS) aim to address societal and environmental challenges through the sustainable use of nature. However, their design and implementation require robust, continuous environmental data to guide planning and assess effectiveness. Traditional field-based monitoring is often too costly, time-consuming, or spatially limited to provide the required information at scale. Remote sensing bridges this gap by offering consistent, spatially explicit, and regularly updated environmental data. It supports the early identification of priority intervention areas, baseline assessments, and long-term impact monitoring. In a changing climate, where adaptive management is crucial, these capabilities are essential to the resilience and success of NBS.
Remote sensing supports NBS implementation in multiple strategic ways:
- Scalability – Satellite data enables consistent monitoring across cities, regions, or countries, helping planners prioritize based on ecosystem trends.
- Repeatability – Frequent data acquisition supports tracking seasonal dynamics, vegetation cycles, and ecological responses to NBS.
- Cost-efficiency – Open-access platforms like Copernicus (Sentinel) and Landsat lower monitoring costs and expand stakeholder access.
- Integration potential – Combining remote sensing with field surveys, IoT, or modeling improves multi-source environmental assessment.
- Transparency – Public data fosters accountability and trust through visual, data-driven reporting.
- Indicator tracking – Supports monitoring of indicators like NDVI, land surface temperature, water availability, and urban heat island effects.
- Climate resilience – Time-series analysis informs adaptive strategies by identifying long-term environmental trends.
- Risk assessment – Enables early detection of stressors like drought, flooding, or degradation, supporting timely NBS responses.
Additional information
Within trans4num, a dedicated Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) site in Hungary demonstrates how remote sensing supports sustainable land management. The site applies drone monitoring and GIS to track land cover, vegetation health, and water dynamics, enabling adaptive management and long-term impact assessment. Drones provide high-resolution data and flexibility, complementing satellites by filling spatial and temporal gaps. The approach emphasizes accessibility using open tools like QGIS and Google Earth Engine, and low-cost drone tech to support uptake by small municipalities or civil groups. Capacity-building is central, with trainings and workshops enabling stakeholders to collect, process, and interpret spatial data. The NBS site serves as a practical, scalable model of how geospatial tools and collaboration can advance effective and inclusive nature-based solutions.
Challenges
- Expert knowledge is required to interpret remote sensing data
- Cloud cover limits the usability of optical satellite imagery
- Technical and financial barriers hinder small stakeholders' access
- Data integration issues affect consistency across different sources
- Institutional gaps and regulations can delay effective implementation
Resources
- Open or commercial satellite imagery for regular environmental monitoring
- GIS and image processing software like QGIS or GEE
- Trained personnel with expertise in remote sensing and analysis
- Sufficient computing infrastructure for data storage and processing
- Institutional support to integrate results into decision-making processes
Traditional use of synthetic insecticides poses risks to both agriculture and food systems. They can harm human health through exposure or contaminated food, and pests are developing resistance, reducing their effectiveness. In oilseed rape, the cabbage stem flea beetle (CSFB) has become a major threat, especially in the UK and northern Europe. Since neonicotinoids were withdrawn, farmers rely on pyrethroids, yet resistance is now widespread. Reducing synthetic insecticide use must be balanced with effective pest control and crop protection, aligning with the One Health approach. EU policy, including Directive 2009/128/EC, promotes sustainable pesticide use and encourages farmers to adopt integrated pest management (IPM) strategies that are more resilient and environmentally sound.
Implementing regenerative practices can enhance crop resilience to pests, but it’s essential to anticipate trade-offs. Practices like reduced tillage, habitat creation, crop diversification, and organic amendments foster a farm ecosystem that works with nature. These measures can strengthen crops, promote beneficial insects, and improve pest tolerance. However, leaving residues on the soil surface may increase slug pressure.
Healthier soils build stronger plants.
Regenerative agriculture improves soil structure and fertility through compost, cover crops, and minimal disturbance. Healthy soils support robust plant growth, making crops less attractive to pests.
Rotations break pest cycles.
Many pests target specific crops. Rotating crops interrupts pest life cycles and naturally reduces their populations.
Beneficial insects reduce pest pressure.
Parasitoids and other allies thrive in no-till systems, where they overwinter in the soil and help control pests.
Lower reliance on costly inputs.
Reducing pesticide use cuts costs and protects beneficial insects.
Regenerative pest management leads to fewer outbreaks, stronger crops, and a more resilient farm system.
Additional information
The Rothamsted Research Large-Scale Rotation Experiment (LSRE) is testing multiple Nature-Based Solution (NBS) interventions, such as crop rotations, diversified cropping, minimal/zero tillage, and organic amendments, applied in different combinations to assess their impact on crop protection and resilience. A key focus is the natural suppression of pests. LSRE monitors the synergies and trade-offs of these approaches, as well as their effects on crop yield, establishment, and condition. Pest dynamics require long-term monitoring. Since LSRE began, reduced tillage systems have seen increased populations of parasitoids that target oilseed rape pests. Other Rothamsted trials show that intercropping reduces pollen beetle damage, while companion planting (e.g., using turnip rape as a trap crop alongside oilseed rape) helps divert pests. LSRE is studying these interactions across contrasting systems. Off-crop habitat management also plays a role, flower-rich margins or in-field strips of companion crops support biocontrol and biodiversity, reducing pest larvae and highlighting the benefits of plant diversification.
Challenges
- Direct drilling is required if using a minimum or zero till approach. This can, over time cause compaction of soil.
- Zero/Min tillage not always appropriate for all soil types.
- Introducing companion plants can be costly due to seed costs and require additional costs for implementation.
- Companion plants may counteract the efforts of one pest but could result in attracting other pests (e.g., clover is a deterrent for CSFB but attracts slugs).
Resources
- A direct drill
- A plan for crop rotations and understanding of what companion plants will work with the chosen crops in relation to pests.
- Knowledge to manage the outcomes of diverting pest attention.
Traditional use of synthetic insecticides poses risks to both agriculture and food systems. They can harm human health through exposure or contaminated food, and pests are developing resistance, reducing their effectiveness. In oilseed rape, the cabbage stem flea beetle (CSFB) has become a major threat, especially in the UK and northern Europe. Since neonicotinoids were withdrawn, farmers rely on pyrethroids, yet resistance is now widespread. Reducing synthetic insecticide use must be balanced with effective pest control and crop protection, aligning with the One Health approach. EU policy, including Directive 2009/128/EC, promotes sustainable pesticide use and encourages farmers to adopt integrated pest management (IPM) strategies that are more resilient and environmentally sound.
Implementing regenerative practices can enhance crop resilience to pests, but it’s essential to anticipate trade-offs. Practices like reduced tillage, habitat creation, crop diversification, and organic amendments foster a farm ecosystem that works with nature. These measures can strengthen crops, promote beneficial insects, and improve pest tolerance. However, leaving residues on the soil surface may increase slug pressure.
Healthier soils build stronger plants.
Regenerative agriculture improves soil structure and fertility through compost, cover crops, and minimal disturbance. Healthy soils support robust plant growth, making crops less attractive to pests.
Rotations break pest cycles.
Many pests target specific crops. Rotating crops interrupts pest life cycles and naturally reduces their populations.
Beneficial insects reduce pest pressure.
Parasitoids and other allies thrive in no-till systems, where they overwinter in the soil and help control pests.
Lower reliance on costly inputs.
Reducing pesticide use cuts costs and protects beneficial insects.
Regenerative pest management leads to fewer outbreaks, stronger crops, and a more resilient farm system.
Additional information
The Rothamsted Research Large-Scale Rotation Experiment (LSRE) is testing multiple Nature-Based Solution (NBS) interventions, such as crop rotations, diversified cropping, minimal/zero tillage, and organic amendments, applied in different combinations to assess their impact on crop protection and resilience. A key focus is the natural suppression of pests. LSRE monitors the synergies and trade-offs of these approaches, as well as their effects on crop yield, establishment, and condition. Pest dynamics require long-term monitoring. Since LSRE began, reduced tillage systems have seen increased populations of parasitoids that target oilseed rape pests. Other Rothamsted trials show that intercropping reduces pollen beetle damage, while companion planting (e.g., using turnip rape as a trap crop alongside oilseed rape) helps divert pests. LSRE is studying these interactions across contrasting systems. Off-crop habitat management also plays a role, flower-rich margins or in-field strips of companion crops support biocontrol and biodiversity, reducing pest larvae and highlighting the benefits of plant diversification.
Challenges
- Direct drilling is required if using a minimum or zero till approach. This can, over time cause compaction of soil.
- Zero/Min tillage not always appropriate for all soil types.
- Introducing companion plants can be costly due to seed costs and require additional costs for implementation.
- Companion plants may counteract the efforts of one pest but could result in attracting other pests (e.g., clover is a deterrent for CSFB but attracts slugs).
Resources
- A direct drill
- A plan for crop rotations and understanding of what companion plants will work with the chosen crops in relation to pests.
- Knowledge to manage the outcomes of diverting pest attention.
Viruses are a serious threat to seed potato cultivation, often causing deformities and yield loss in affected plants. Symptoms include leafroll and mosaic patterns on the leaves. To identify and remove infected plants, seed potato growers carry out field inspections throughout the growing season. If too many infected plants are found, the crop may be rejected by the certification authority (Dutch: NAK).
These viruses are primarily spread by aphids, which transmit the virus by piercing the plant. To prevent this, farmers spray insecticides and mineral oil onto the crops. However, an increasing number of these products have been banned in recent years, making it more difficult to protect the plants effectively. As a result, alternative methods are being explored, such as covering the potato crop with straw to reduce aphid pressure. In this study, not only straw but also fresh grass and grass-clover were used. This choice was made because straw requires nitrogen to decompose. The aim of the study is to find out whether grass and grass-clover have the same effect on aphid populations as straw.
Reducing the use of synthetic fertilizers is a key priority for seed potato growers. One specific area for improvement is the additional application of mineral nitrogen used to help break down straw. When straw is applied to reduce aphid pressure in the field, it competes with the potato plant for nitrogen, as straw decomposition consumes nitrogen from the soil. This study explores whether grass-clover and/or fresh grass could serve as effective alternatives to straw. These options are evaluated alongside the traditional method of using mineral oil. The research also investigates whether intercropping different types of green manures between the potato ridges can offer a natural solution to virus problems. The green manure begins growing earlier than the potato plant, so aphids may settle on the green manure instead, potentially reducing the risk of virus transmission to the crops.
Additional information
The research begins by exploring why certain practices are used in Dutch seed potato cultivation, and what drives growers to make these choices. These decisions are discussed with both farmers and advisors. The next challenge is to determine whether the same goals can be achieved using alternative methods, while also reducing the input of minerals. This involves raising awareness among growers about the importance of limiting mineral use to protect water quality. By monitoring nitrogen uptake by the crop at multiple points during the growing season, we gain a clearer understanding of the process and of the impact of inter-row green manures or straw/grass covers on the potato crop. With these insights, growers can adjust their management throughout the season, helping to minimize potential yield losses due to reduced mineral input.
Challenges
- Minimizing pesticide dependency: Achieving a significant reduction in pesticide use, including the near elimination of aphid control agents and oils for virus prevention.
- Reducing fertilizer inputs: Lower reliance on chemical fertilizers while maintaining crop performance.
- Restoring productivity: Recovery of previously lost yields and enhanced farm resilience and operational efficiency.
- Boosting biodiversity: Decreased chemical inputs contribute to improved biodiversity and reduced ecological impact during cultivation.
- Enhancing water quality: Reduced leaching of agrochemicals leads to better water quality at the regional scale.
Resources
- Nitrogen sampling at the beginning and end of the growing season.
- Crop development assessments at several points during the season.
- Evaluation of plant differences and stem counts to determine the impact of each treatment.
- Yield measurement and size grading per plot.
- Virus monitoring during the season and through post-harvest tuber inspections.
Viruses are a serious threat to seed potato cultivation, often causing deformities and yield loss in affected plants. Symptoms include leafroll and mosaic patterns on the leaves. To identify and remove infected plants, seed potato growers carry out field inspections throughout the growing season. If too many infected plants are found, the crop may be rejected by the certification authority (Dutch: NAK).
These viruses are primarily spread by aphids, which transmit the virus by piercing the plant. To prevent this, farmers spray insecticides and mineral oil onto the crops. However, an increasing number of these products have been banned in recent years, making it more difficult to protect the plants effectively. As a result, alternative methods are being explored, such as covering the potato crop with straw to reduce aphid pressure. In this study, not only straw but also fresh grass and grass-clover were used. This choice was made because straw requires nitrogen to decompose. The aim of the study is to find out whether grass and grass-clover have the same effect on aphid populations as straw.
Reducing the use of synthetic fertilizers is a key priority for seed potato growers. One specific area for improvement is the additional application of mineral nitrogen used to help break down straw. When straw is applied to reduce aphid pressure in the field, it competes with the potato plant for nitrogen, as straw decomposition consumes nitrogen from the soil. This study explores whether grass-clover and/or fresh grass could serve as effective alternatives to straw. These options are evaluated alongside the traditional method of using mineral oil. The research also investigates whether intercropping different types of green manures between the potato ridges can offer a natural solution to virus problems. The green manure begins growing earlier than the potato plant, so aphids may settle on the green manure instead, potentially reducing the risk of virus transmission to the crops.
Additional information
The research begins by exploring why certain practices are used in Dutch seed potato cultivation, and what drives growers to make these choices. These decisions are discussed with both farmers and advisors. The next challenge is to determine whether the same goals can be achieved using alternative methods, while also reducing the input of minerals. This involves raising awareness among growers about the importance of limiting mineral use to protect water quality. By monitoring nitrogen uptake by the crop at multiple points during the growing season, we gain a clearer understanding of the process and of the impact of inter-row green manures or straw/grass covers on the potato crop. With these insights, growers can adjust their management throughout the season, helping to minimize potential yield losses due to reduced mineral input.
Challenges
- Minimizing pesticide dependency: Achieving a significant reduction in pesticide use, including the near elimination of aphid control agents and oils for virus prevention.
- Reducing fertilizer inputs: Lower reliance on chemical fertilizers while maintaining crop performance.
- Restoring productivity: Recovery of previously lost yields and enhanced farm resilience and operational efficiency.
- Boosting biodiversity: Decreased chemical inputs contribute to improved biodiversity and reduced ecological impact during cultivation.
- Enhancing water quality: Reduced leaching of agrochemicals leads to better water quality at the regional scale.
Resources
- Nitrogen sampling at the beginning and end of the growing season.
- Crop development assessments at several points during the season.
- Evaluation of plant differences and stem counts to determine the impact of each treatment.
- Yield measurement and size grading per plot.
- Virus monitoring during the season and through post-harvest tuber inspections.
Planty Organic is a long-term farming experiment that began in 2012 at the SPNA experimental farm in Kollumerwaard. It focuses on organic crop production using only plant-based inputs. Instead of animal manure or synthetic fertilizers, the system uses legumes, cover crops, green manures, and "cut-and-carry" plant material to feed the soil. The main crops include potatoes, pumpkins, grains, and grass-clover.
Planty Organic began with a question from a group of organic arable farmers in the Northern clay region of the Netherlands: How can we make better use of nitrogen in organic farming—and improve efficiency without relying on animal manure or synthetic fertilizers? That question sparked the start of the Planty Organic experiment in 2012. The research uses a crop plan typical for the region—potatoes, pumpkins, carrots, grains, and grass-clover—supported by green manures. What makes it unique is its commitment to plant-based inputs only. For the first 10 years, no minerals or manure were added. Instead, grass-clover was harvested and returned to the field as fertilizer—a method known as “cut and carry.” After this initial period, compost and bokashi were introduced into the system. However, even today, no animal manure or synthetic fertilizers are used—staying true to the plant-based approach that inspired the project.
One of the main challenges with plant-based fertilization is the mismatch between nitrogen supply and crop demand over time. This imbalance can lead to significantly lower yields for certain crops. We currently lack detailed knowledge about the optimal timing and methods for applying plant-based fertilizers. Understanding how to synchronize nutrient release with crop needs is crucial for improving performance and reliability in fully plant-based systems.
Additional information
Within the trans4num project, we are exploring how plant-based fertilization can shape the future of sustainable farming. Several ongoing experiments are helping us better understand its impact:
- Microbial research with Wageningen University - Wageningen University is studying our fields to compare the microbiological effects of plant-based nutrition with those of conventional organic farming systems.
- On-farm implementation with over 20 farmers - Since 2022, more than 20 arable farmers have started applying our knowledge to improve their use of cover crops—supported by one of the Netherlands' largest farmer cooperatives. Their advisors play a key role in sharing practical results.
- Pioneering fully plant-based farming - A small number of organic farmers have now fully transitioned to plant-based nutrition. At the moment, this is the only known method that enables 100% vegan-certified food production.
- Farm of the Future - We’ve launched a new long-term field experiment called The Farm of the Future, where we apply this knowledge in a conventional arable farming system.
The benefits
No Animal By-Products: Plant-based fertilizers contain no liquid manure, bone meal, or blood meal. This greatly reduces the risk of contamination with pathogens, hormones, or antibiotics.
Healthier Soil and More Biodiversity: These fertilizers feed soil life by providing organic matter that supports beneficial microbes. Materials like vegetable compost and cover crops help build a living, resilient soil with better water retention and natural disease resistance.
Less Dependence on Livestock: Using plants and organic waste as fertilizer reduces reliance on animal manure, an important advantage in regions like the Netherlands, where organic manure is costly.
Lower Risk of Nutrient Leaching: Unlike synthetic fertilizers or liquid manure, many plant-based fertilizers release nutrients slowly, allowing crops to absorb them over time and reducing the risk of groundwater contamination.
Planty Organic is a long-term farming experiment that began in 2012 at the SPNA experimental farm in Kollumerwaard. It focuses on organic crop production using only plant-based inputs. Instead of animal manure or synthetic fertilizers, the system uses legumes, cover crops, green manures, and "cut-and-carry" plant material to feed the soil. The main crops include potatoes, pumpkins, grains, and grass-clover.
Planty Organic began with a question from a group of organic arable farmers in the Northern clay region of the Netherlands: How can we make better use of nitrogen in organic farming—and improve efficiency without relying on animal manure or synthetic fertilizers? That question sparked the start of the Planty Organic experiment in 2012. The research uses a crop plan typical for the region—potatoes, pumpkins, carrots, grains, and grass-clover—supported by green manures. What makes it unique is its commitment to plant-based inputs only. For the first 10 years, no minerals or manure were added. Instead, grass-clover was harvested and returned to the field as fertilizer—a method known as “cut and carry.” After this initial period, compost and bokashi were introduced into the system. However, even today, no animal manure or synthetic fertilizers are used—staying true to the plant-based approach that inspired the project.
One of the main challenges with plant-based fertilization is the mismatch between nitrogen supply and crop demand over time. This imbalance can lead to significantly lower yields for certain crops. We currently lack detailed knowledge about the optimal timing and methods for applying plant-based fertilizers. Understanding how to synchronize nutrient release with crop needs is crucial for improving performance and reliability in fully plant-based systems.
Additional information
Within the trans4num project, we are exploring how plant-based fertilization can shape the future of sustainable farming. Several ongoing experiments are helping us better understand its impact:
- Microbial research with Wageningen University - Wageningen University is studying our fields to compare the microbiological effects of plant-based nutrition with those of conventional organic farming systems.
- On-farm implementation with over 20 farmers - Since 2022, more than 20 arable farmers have started applying our knowledge to improve their use of cover crops—supported by one of the Netherlands' largest farmer cooperatives. Their advisors play a key role in sharing practical results.
- Pioneering fully plant-based farming - A small number of organic farmers have now fully transitioned to plant-based nutrition. At the moment, this is the only known method that enables 100% vegan-certified food production.
- Farm of the Future - We’ve launched a new long-term field experiment called The Farm of the Future, where we apply this knowledge in a conventional arable farming system.
The benefits
No Animal By-Products: Plant-based fertilizers contain no liquid manure, bone meal, or blood meal. This greatly reduces the risk of contamination with pathogens, hormones, or antibiotics.
Healthier Soil and More Biodiversity: These fertilizers feed soil life by providing organic matter that supports beneficial microbes. Materials like vegetable compost and cover crops help build a living, resilient soil with better water retention and natural disease resistance.
Less Dependence on Livestock: Using plants and organic waste as fertilizer reduces reliance on animal manure, an important advantage in regions like the Netherlands, where organic manure is costly.
Lower Risk of Nutrient Leaching: Unlike synthetic fertilizers or liquid manure, many plant-based fertilizers release nutrients slowly, allowing crops to absorb them over time and reducing the risk of groundwater contamination.
Satellite monitoring enables a cost effective solution to understanding the spatial variation throughout a large NBS site. It provides an effective way of monitoring effects after applying a NBS, and enables better and more precise understanding of the potential of applying a NBS on a regional scale.
In the trans4num Decision Support Tool, we focus on the effects of introducing NBS across an entire region. In the Danish site this region contains more than 40.000 fields. Here a primary focus is on the spatial effect of the NBS, where the effect of decisions is highly affected by aspatial component. This requires deep understanding of the spatial variation of the arable land in the region. Satellite monitoring provides a crucial input to this understanding, and can help in measuring the actual effect of implementing a NBS across the region. In order to understand the context of a large region, it is key to know the crops on individual fields on every growth season, an application where satellite monitoring is a very efficient tool to provide insights on the most important crops.
Manual data collection, like soil sampling, at individual fields is at best sparse, and with varying degree of details across farms. Data collected withdrones, enables very precise high resolution data, however the cost of collecting data, makes it very hard to obtain for large regions, especially in atemporal context, where data has to be fetched throughout the growth seasons. Remote sensing makes the trade-off whereprecision and spatial resolution is sacrificed for high temporal resolution, and complete spatial coverage. This makes a perfect match for the regional scale at which the trans4num Decision Support Tool operates. Here the focus is not on optimization within a specific field or farm, but at a regional scale. Hence the high resolution from more precise sources like UAV monitoring is of no to little benefit.
Additional information
Aarhus University and Cordulus provides a satellite monitoring pipeline targeted towards the regional scale NBS sites in the trans4num project. The data is directly targeted towards the NBS decision support tool being developed in the project. Many of the existing work and tools for satellite monitoring are focused on the monitoring of field or farm level variation of fields. In trans4num the focus has been shifted towards monitoring of large regions, which introduces a requirement for a very effective pipeline and processing chain, but which in turn also enables a smaller focus on individual details in the collected data. The satellite imagery works as a key input to the Decision Support Tool, for it to function effectively. The Decision Support Tool, is capable of describing spatial variation based on tabular values, manually collected field data and low resolution nitrogen leaching maps, however a more detailed spatial effect of introducing NBS solutions can be extracted through the use of satellite imagery.
Challenges
- The access to large quantities of ground truth data is required in order to generate effective monitoring algorithms. This is due to the fact that we monitor large regions, and have large quantities of low resolution input data available, but data driven models also require a lot of targets in order to generalize.
- The noise in satellite imagery primarily from clouds introduce significant challenges for automated analysis.
The remote sensing satellite data enables time series monitoring of crop health at the scale, and provides important inputs on the spatial variation in growth of individual crops, throughout several growth seasons, providing detailed insights throughout the case areas.
Satellite monitoring enables a cost effective solution to understanding the spatial variation throughout a large NBS site. It provides an effective way of monitoring effects after applying a NBS, and enables better and more precise understanding of the potential of applying a NBS on a regional scale.
In the trans4num Decision Support Tool, we focus on the effects of introducing NBS across an entire region. In the Danish site this region contains more than 40.000 fields. Here a primary focus is on the spatial effect of the NBS, where the effect of decisions is highly affected by aspatial component. This requires deep understanding of the spatial variation of the arable land in the region. Satellite monitoring provides a crucial input to this understanding, and can help in measuring the actual effect of implementing a NBS across the region. In order to understand the context of a large region, it is key to know the crops on individual fields on every growth season, an application where satellite monitoring is a very efficient tool to provide insights on the most important crops.
Manual data collection, like soil sampling, at individual fields is at best sparse, and with varying degree of details across farms. Data collected withdrones, enables very precise high resolution data, however the cost of collecting data, makes it very hard to obtain for large regions, especially in atemporal context, where data has to be fetched throughout the growth seasons. Remote sensing makes the trade-off whereprecision and spatial resolution is sacrificed for high temporal resolution, and complete spatial coverage. This makes a perfect match for the regional scale at which the trans4num Decision Support Tool operates. Here the focus is not on optimization within a specific field or farm, but at a regional scale. Hence the high resolution from more precise sources like UAV monitoring is of no to little benefit.
Additional information
Aarhus University and Cordulus provides a satellite monitoring pipeline targeted towards the regional scale NBS sites in the trans4num project. The data is directly targeted towards the NBS decision support tool being developed in the project. Many of the existing work and tools for satellite monitoring are focused on the monitoring of field or farm level variation of fields. In trans4num the focus has been shifted towards monitoring of large regions, which introduces a requirement for a very effective pipeline and processing chain, but which in turn also enables a smaller focus on individual details in the collected data. The satellite imagery works as a key input to the Decision Support Tool, for it to function effectively. The Decision Support Tool, is capable of describing spatial variation based on tabular values, manually collected field data and low resolution nitrogen leaching maps, however a more detailed spatial effect of introducing NBS solutions can be extracted through the use of satellite imagery.
Challenges
- The access to large quantities of ground truth data is required in order to generate effective monitoring algorithms. This is due to the fact that we monitor large regions, and have large quantities of low resolution input data available, but data driven models also require a lot of targets in order to generalize.
- The noise in satellite imagery primarily from clouds introduce significant challenges for automated analysis.
The remote sensing satellite data enables time series monitoring of crop health at the scale, and provides important inputs on the spatial variation in growth of individual crops, throughout several growth seasons, providing detailed insights throughout the case areas.
Transforming agricultural practices—or entire farming systems—may seem ambitious or even utopian. However, the trans4num approach promotes a stepwise, reflective and iterative process to integrate nature-based solutions(NBS). This method benefits individual farm sites and cumulatively contributes to a broader shift from linear to circular nutrient management.
Intensive farming systems are increasingly challenged by persistent environmental issues such as nutrient runoff, soil degradation, and declining biodiversity. Traditional nutrient management practices often fail to address these challenges adequately, resulting insignificant negative ecological impacts that extend beyond the farm. By integrating NBS such as cover crops, riparian buffer strips, and agroforestry, farmers have the opportunity to recycle nutrients effectively, improve soil fertility, and mitigate environmental damage. A key challenge is that no single solution can be universally applied; each farm has unique characteristics such as soil type, climate, and existing management practices. A range of locally adapted strategies is necessary to generate meaningful, cumulative changes that pave the way for a transformation from linear to circular nutrient management. Moreover, there is a critical need for a stepwise and reflective approach. Each intervention must be evaluated to ensure it contributes not only to local improvements but also to the transformation toward circular nutrient management. This methodical progression helps prevent missteps and ensures that the innovations adopted are both effective and sustainable over the long term.
Adopting a stepwise approach in nutrient management offers several significant benefits for both individual farm operations and the broader agricultural community. It creates a dynamic network among farmers, advisors, and other stakeholders who share a common interest in sustainable practices.
Additional information
A Gradual Yet Transformative Approach
The trans4num project embodies an incremental yet transformative approach to rethinking nutrient management. Our strategy is built on the recognition that agricultural systems are inherently complex and that achieving radical change requires a gradual, well-monitored process. Rather than pursuing an abrupt overhaul, trans4num promotes a series of deliberate, small-scale innovations that cumulatively drive circular nutrient management transformation.
Local Implementation & Empirical Trial Sites
At the heart of the trans4num approach is the implementation of NBS at trial sites. These sites serve as living laboratories where local knowledge and innovative practices are harnessed to create tailored solutions that meet specific environmental and operational needs. By starting at a manageable scale, farmers can experiment with NBS such as cover crops or constructed wetlands, gather empirical data, and adjust practices accordingly before wider adoption.
Stepwise Adaptation & Scalable Innovation
Innovation in trans4num is built on incremental steps—each designed as part of a larger system shift toward circular nutrient management. Small transitions, from initial trials to broader implementation, build momentum by showing real-world benefits. The framework reflects on short-term barriers (like resource limits or knowledge gaps) and deeper lock-ins (such as entrenched practices or weak governance). This dynamic, stepwise approach helps ensure lasting impact. As local solutions prove effective, they can be adapted and scaled to other regions, multiplying their influence. By combining adaptability with a long-term vision, trans4num supports both immediate improvements and deeper, structural transformation in nutrient management.
Challenges
- Address lock-ins and reflect to drive real change in nutrient management.
Resources
- Build networks, share knowledge, and support NBS to scale across farming systems
Transforming agricultural practices—or entire farming systems—may seem ambitious or even utopian. However, the trans4num approach promotes a stepwise, reflective and iterative process to integrate nature-based solutions(NBS). This method benefits individual farm sites and cumulatively contributes to a broader shift from linear to circular nutrient management.
Intensive farming systems are increasingly challenged by persistent environmental issues such as nutrient runoff, soil degradation, and declining biodiversity. Traditional nutrient management practices often fail to address these challenges adequately, resulting insignificant negative ecological impacts that extend beyond the farm. By integrating NBS such as cover crops, riparian buffer strips, and agroforestry, farmers have the opportunity to recycle nutrients effectively, improve soil fertility, and mitigate environmental damage. A key challenge is that no single solution can be universally applied; each farm has unique characteristics such as soil type, climate, and existing management practices. A range of locally adapted strategies is necessary to generate meaningful, cumulative changes that pave the way for a transformation from linear to circular nutrient management. Moreover, there is a critical need for a stepwise and reflective approach. Each intervention must be evaluated to ensure it contributes not only to local improvements but also to the transformation toward circular nutrient management. This methodical progression helps prevent missteps and ensures that the innovations adopted are both effective and sustainable over the long term.
Adopting a stepwise approach in nutrient management offers several significant benefits for both individual farm operations and the broader agricultural community. It creates a dynamic network among farmers, advisors, and other stakeholders who share a common interest in sustainable practices.
Additional information
A Gradual Yet Transformative Approach
The trans4num project embodies an incremental yet transformative approach to rethinking nutrient management. Our strategy is built on the recognition that agricultural systems are inherently complex and that achieving radical change requires a gradual, well-monitored process. Rather than pursuing an abrupt overhaul, trans4num promotes a series of deliberate, small-scale innovations that cumulatively drive circular nutrient management transformation.
Local Implementation & Empirical Trial Sites
At the heart of the trans4num approach is the implementation of NBS at trial sites. These sites serve as living laboratories where local knowledge and innovative practices are harnessed to create tailored solutions that meet specific environmental and operational needs. By starting at a manageable scale, farmers can experiment with NBS such as cover crops or constructed wetlands, gather empirical data, and adjust practices accordingly before wider adoption.
Stepwise Adaptation & Scalable Innovation
Innovation in trans4num is built on incremental steps—each designed as part of a larger system shift toward circular nutrient management. Small transitions, from initial trials to broader implementation, build momentum by showing real-world benefits. The framework reflects on short-term barriers (like resource limits or knowledge gaps) and deeper lock-ins (such as entrenched practices or weak governance). This dynamic, stepwise approach helps ensure lasting impact. As local solutions prove effective, they can be adapted and scaled to other regions, multiplying their influence. By combining adaptability with a long-term vision, trans4num supports both immediate improvements and deeper, structural transformation in nutrient management.
Challenges
- Address lock-ins and reflect to drive real change in nutrient management.
Resources
- Build networks, share knowledge, and support NBS to scale across farming systems
Soil organic matter (SOM) is ~50% carbon; the rest includes nutrients like N, P, S, O, and H that support microbial life. Microbial activity enhances soil structure, water retention, aeration, and root growth, making SOM a vital nutrient reservoir. Most carbon is stored in soils, so soil organic carbon (SOC) plays a key role in climate regulation. Yet, SOC is easily lost through conventional farming, which disrupts soil structure and hinders carbon replacement. Effective land management is essential to make soils reliable carbon sinks. However, knowledge gaps remain about which practices, or combinations, best enhance SOC. Promising options include reduced tillage, perennial crops, cover cropping, managed grazing, manure or compost application, and residue retention. The impact of any NBS depends on how it's combined with others. Rothamsted's LSRE tests systems integrating compost, cover crops, reduced tillage, and perennials.
Even small increases in SOM and SOC benefit soil health, boosting water and nutrient use efficiency, soil structure, and biodiversity (e.g. earthworms). In the global north, carbon-rich soils must be responsibly managed. Globally, soils (mainly agricultural) could sequester over a billion additional tons of carbon per year. Nature-Based Solutions (NBS), like those tested in Rothamsted's LSRE, support SOC and SOM through practices such as reduced tillage, residue retention, compost and manure application, and leys in crop rotations. These practices enhance microbial activity and nutrient cycling, contributing to long-term soil and planetary health. NBS create favorable conditions for sustaining soil function and resilience. SOM is typically measured via Loss on Ignition (burning off organic matter), while SOC is more precisely assessed using the Dumas method (dry combustion), which quantifies CO₂ released by heating soil in oxygen-rich air.
Additional information
The Rothamsted Research Large-Scale Rotation Experiment (LSRE) tests multiple Nature-Based Solutions (NBS), such as crop rotations, diversified cropping, minimal/zero tillage, and organic amendments, applied in combinations to assess their effects on soil properties, especially SOC and SOM. LSRE monitors synergies, trade-offs, crop yields, and fertilizer use efficiency. SOC must be measured over time, as weather causes seasonal fluctuations. While all treatments showed short-term SOC decreases, long-term results highlight the consistent benefits of NBS, confirming the value of long-term trials. SOC often rises in rotation phases with NBS input (e.g. compost) and falls in others; thus, benefits are assessed at the full-system level. After six years, the top five systems for SOC all combined compost with reduced tillage, even on sandy soils with limited storage capacity. Larger impacts are expected at the clay soil LSRE site. Managing SOC requires strategies like reduced tillage, cover crops, livestock integration, compost, and residue retention—all of which enhance SOM, soil structure, and ecosystem services like water retention and reduced input loss.
Challenges
- LSRE does not include livestock integration, so not representative of a mixed system.
- Challenges in removing cover crops and perennial lays without tillage.
- Over-reliance onglysophate.
- Extreme weather and establishing cover crops in time for growing season.
Resources
- Direct drilling machinery appropriate to soil type.
- Access to livestock manure and/or livestock plus livestock infrastructure.
- Access to green compost.
- Appropriate varieties for diversified cropping rotations.
Soil organic matter (SOM) is ~50% carbon; the rest includes nutrients like N, P, S, O, and H that support microbial life. Microbial activity enhances soil structure, water retention, aeration, and root growth, making SOM a vital nutrient reservoir. Most carbon is stored in soils, so soil organic carbon (SOC) plays a key role in climate regulation. Yet, SOC is easily lost through conventional farming, which disrupts soil structure and hinders carbon replacement. Effective land management is essential to make soils reliable carbon sinks. However, knowledge gaps remain about which practices, or combinations, best enhance SOC. Promising options include reduced tillage, perennial crops, cover cropping, managed grazing, manure or compost application, and residue retention. The impact of any NBS depends on how it's combined with others. Rothamsted's LSRE tests systems integrating compost, cover crops, reduced tillage, and perennials.
Even small increases in SOM and SOC benefit soil health, boosting water and nutrient use efficiency, soil structure, and biodiversity (e.g. earthworms). In the global north, carbon-rich soils must be responsibly managed. Globally, soils (mainly agricultural) could sequester over a billion additional tons of carbon per year. Nature-Based Solutions (NBS), like those tested in Rothamsted's LSRE, support SOC and SOM through practices such as reduced tillage, residue retention, compost and manure application, and leys in crop rotations. These practices enhance microbial activity and nutrient cycling, contributing to long-term soil and planetary health. NBS create favorable conditions for sustaining soil function and resilience. SOM is typically measured via Loss on Ignition (burning off organic matter), while SOC is more precisely assessed using the Dumas method (dry combustion), which quantifies CO₂ released by heating soil in oxygen-rich air.
Additional information
The Rothamsted Research Large-Scale Rotation Experiment (LSRE) tests multiple Nature-Based Solutions (NBS), such as crop rotations, diversified cropping, minimal/zero tillage, and organic amendments, applied in combinations to assess their effects on soil properties, especially SOC and SOM. LSRE monitors synergies, trade-offs, crop yields, and fertilizer use efficiency. SOC must be measured over time, as weather causes seasonal fluctuations. While all treatments showed short-term SOC decreases, long-term results highlight the consistent benefits of NBS, confirming the value of long-term trials. SOC often rises in rotation phases with NBS input (e.g. compost) and falls in others; thus, benefits are assessed at the full-system level. After six years, the top five systems for SOC all combined compost with reduced tillage, even on sandy soils with limited storage capacity. Larger impacts are expected at the clay soil LSRE site. Managing SOC requires strategies like reduced tillage, cover crops, livestock integration, compost, and residue retention—all of which enhance SOM, soil structure, and ecosystem services like water retention and reduced input loss.
Challenges
- LSRE does not include livestock integration, so not representative of a mixed system.
- Challenges in removing cover crops and perennial lays without tillage.
- Over-reliance onglysophate.
- Extreme weather and establishing cover crops in time for growing season.
Resources
- Direct drilling machinery appropriate to soil type.
- Access to livestock manure and/or livestock plus livestock infrastructure.
- Access to green compost.
- Appropriate varieties for diversified cropping rotations.
Contacts
Project email
Project coordinator
-
UNIVERSITAET HOHENHEIM
Project coordinator
Project partners
-
Aarhus Univeristy
Project partner
Website Research institute -
Cordulus
Project partner
Website SME -
Forschunginstitut fur Biologischen Landbau Stiftung
Project partner
Website Research institute -
Highclere Consulting SRL
Project partner
Website SME -
Innovationscenter for Okologisk Landbrug
Project partner
Website Research institute -
Klimafonden Skive
Project partner
Website SME -
Pannon-Mag-Agrar KFT
Project partner
Website SME -
Pisztrang Kor Egyesulet
Project partner
Website Research institute -
Plan4All ZS
Project partner
Website NGO -
Rothamsted Research
Project partner
Website Research institute -
Stichting Proefboerderijen Noordelijke Akkerbouw
Project partner
Website Research institute -
Szechenyi Egyetem
Project partner
Website Research institute -
Wageningen University
Project partner
Website Research institute -
Agricultural Information Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Project partner
Website Research institute -
Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science
Project partner
Website Research institute -
Southwest University
Project partner
Website Research institute -
Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Project partner
Website Research institute -
Tsinghua University
Project partner
Website Research institute -
Center for Agri-Food Quality And Safety, Ministry of Agriculture And Rural Affairs
Project partner
Website Research institute -
Research Center for Rural Economy, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs
Project partner
Website Research institute -
China Agricultural University
Project partner
Website Research institute