project - Research and innovation

Valorising and balancing the ecosystem service benefits offered by legumes, and legume-based cropped systems

Project identifier: 2024HE_101135512_LegumES
Ongoing | 2024 - 2027 Portugal, Spain, Italy, Germany, France, Hungary, Slovenia, Denmark, Belgium, North Macedonia, Switzerland and the United Kingdom
Ongoing | 2024 - 2027 Portugal, Spain, Italy, Germany, France, Hungary, Slovenia, Denmark, Belgium, North Macedonia, Switzerland and the United Kingdom

Contexte

In many food cultures, legumes have historically provided the main source of dietary protein or serve as a necessary supplement to other complementary protein sources, for humans and farmed animals. Across Europe the production and consumption of legumes and legume-based products has been low but is now increasing, though whether these foods are derived from ‘home-grown’ legumes (i.e., cultivated within the EU) is much less-likely. Hence, the potential environmental and economic benefits of legumes are not necessarily being realized ‘at home’. It is, therefore, important that plant-based foods and feeds are delivered by legumes which are home-grown, since high import dependency means the multi-environmental and socio-economic benefits of legumes are forfeited. It is also important to note that as legumes are underutilized crops across Europe, the best-agronomic practices for legumes are not always carried out, and this leads to limited yields, and lower yield stability compared to cereals. Hence, where legume agronomy can be optimized, this can cascade to other following crops in the system, through soil fertility and function, and quality benefits, allowing the potential of diversified legume-based cropping systems to be fully realized.

While the potential multifunctional Ecosystem Services benefits of legumes are well known and complex, realizing these in practice has proven difficult. Yet, these benefits are well positioned to address the three existential crisis facing humanity: climate change, biodiversity loss, and nutritional provision. Hence, Ecosystem Services monitoring is critical, though challenging, and requires that there is strict definition of the Ecosystem Services being monitored, and their underpinning Ecosystem Services indicators. In addition, monitoring approaches must be robust and flexible to ensure uptake and application of Ecosystem Services indicators monitoring across scales both spatial and temporal. 

Objectives

The overall aim of legumES is to share, showcase, co-develop, and implement the knowledge, key agronomic practices, methodologies, and tools which will allow optimized legume-based systems, and valorisation of the ecosystem services benefits provided. Hence, the project will ensure: 1, the uptake of best practices in agrobiodiverse legume-based cropped systems; 2, the uptake of methodologies and tools to quantify and balance the environmental and economic ecosystem service benefits provided by legumes; 3, that the Ecosystem Services benefits and cost offered by legumes are quantified across scales from field, farm, regional, national, and global levels; and 4, Ecosystem Services will be assessed to identify those conditions which are able to meet the EU targets: to decrease agrichemical inputs and losses, combat climate change, reverse biodiversity loss, and ensure the best nutritional provisioning.

Activities

LegumES propose a set of strategic and fully inclusive multi-actor driven solutions, supported by the delivery of practical methodologies, and tools to help inform how legumes and legume-based crop systems should be deployed and monitored to realize diversified legume-based cropping systems in the EU and Associated countries. Our state-of-the-art framework will also account how the environmental benefits of legume- based crop production may be best-balanced with the economic consequences of alternative land use scenarios. LegumES will therefore also diversify legume research to include crops, ecosystem services, contexts, and scales not yet well studied, to provide the agroecological knowledge-base farmers need to amplify their potential benefits. 

The legumES approach is founded on the implementation of ‘Action-Research’ and Ecosystem Services-Design’ Frameworks. This multi-actor approach aims to balance and harmonize across scales the ES benefits offered by legume-based food- and feed-systems. Initially, the multi-actor approach will provide an overview of current system design and an overall socio-economic and pedoclimatic situation analysis, as informed by evidence and reviews. This will also provide insight into the opportunities and barriers for the methods and tools to be used in Ecosystem Services, and underpinning ecosystem service indicator accounting. Collectively, this will provide a framework for system valorization, and for system components in isolation and in combinations. The Outcomes Framework will comprise ‘Route Maps’ which define how best Ecosystem Services monitoring and evaluation may be mainstreamed; that is, identifying the specific activities, scenarios and facilitating agents which are necessary to realize optimized legume-based systems in practice, and regular monitoring of the Ecosystem Services benefits they provide. 

More specifically, LegumES brings together existing knowledge, methodologies, tools, historic data, and wider stakeholder fora to establish a robust and practical framework to monitor and valorize the Ecosystem Services provided by legumes.  WP1 and WP2 are built on a MAA foundation to facilitate co-learning and co-creation through multiactor engagement and capacity building for increased legume cultivation, processing, and consumption. WP3-5 are built on the concept of the three pillars of sustainability, which are: ‘economics’, ‘social structure’ and ‘environment’. These will conduct an environmental, economic, and policy assessment of legume-based cropped systems. Allied these 2 concepts will allow the creation and development of new methodologies and tools (WP6) to support the quantification of legumes ES through. 

Project details
Main funding source
Horizon Europe (EU Research and Innovation Programme)
Type of Horizon project
Multi-actor project
Project acronym
LegumES
CORDIS Fact sheet
Project contribution to CAP specific objectives
  • SO3. Farmer position in value chains
  • SO4. Agriculture and climate mitigation
  • Protecting food and health quality
  • Fostering knowledge and innovation
Project contribution to EU Strategies
  • Achieving climate neutrality
  • Reducing nutrient losses and the use of fertilisers, while maintaining soil fertility
  • Improving management of natural resources used by agriculture, such as water, soil and air

EUR 4 619 172.50

Total budget

Total contributions including EU funding.

EUR 4 619 172.50

EU contribution

Any type of EU funding.

5 Practice Abstracts

Problem                   

Legumes are often regarded as non-profitable crops due to their lower and highly volatile yield, due to pests and weed control. 

Solution                   

Introducing legumes as part of a crop-rotation can supply a variety of benefits called “ecosystem services”; which could be more accurately quantified by assessing the legume impact over the whole crop rotation, rather than just as a single crop.

 Benefits 

Legumes in crop-rotation systems provide a suite of ecosystem benefits, including improvements in crop diversification, encouraging natural nutrient cycling, reducing pollution, and supporting pollinating, and other beneficial insects.

Practical recommendation 

Use leguminous main crops and cover crops as a:

  • ‘green manure’ prior to high nitrogen (N)-fertiliser demanding crops;
  • sacrificial green manure, grown then mown between cash-crop (cereal) rows; and,
  • prior to high nitrogen (N) fertiliser demanding crops. 
Geographical Location

Perugia

Problem                   

Intercropping winter peas with barley could prevent legume canopy collapse and competition from weeds. There is limited knowledge, however, of the sowing ratios and agronomy that improve performance of winter pea-barley intercrops in Scotland. 

Solution                   

We trialled multiple winter pea and barley cultivars in different sowing densities and ratios, soil cultivation, fertiliser and other inputs to detect the best outcomes for yield, weed and pest control. 

Benefits 

Highest grain yields and lowest weed cover were achieved with sowing densities of 1.25x standard densities (pea+barley), >50% std. density barley in the mix, and 75% of the standard nitrogen level for barley, indicating potential costs and benefits when maximizing winter pea performance.

Practical recommendation 

  • In Northern UK, winter legume-cereal crops can be sown within a suitable weather window in the autumn (September – November).
  • Crops can be sown into ploughed or unploughed soil, although yields tend to be lower with direct drilled crops.
  • Select varieties that are more likely to coincide in their maturity timings, using information from industry recommended lists of crop varieties.
  • Winter survival and competitiveness of the main commercial pea varieties can be problematic but novel germplasm selected for intercropping offers improvements in future.
  • Highest grain yields and lowest weed cover can be achieved with sowing densities of 1.25x standard densities (pea+barley), and 75% of the standard nitrogen level for barley.
  • Pre-emergence herbicide reduces early weed competition but is rarely needed after crop establishment; protection of the pea crop against bird damage can be important for crop establishment.
  • Split fertiliser treatments are applied at sowing (Sept-Nov) and during barley tillering (March-May), at 50-75% of the standard nitrogen rate for barley.
  • Monitor crop development, and pest and disease incidence, although the latter was low in our 3 years of tria
Geographical Location

United Kingdom

Problem                   

In organic faba beans cultivation success is often determined by two main factors: effective weed management; and limiting the impact of diseases.

Solution                   

According to experience in the Swiss pedoclimate, intercropping faba beans with oats can increase yield resilience for winter- and spring-sown crops. This is achieved through the ability of intercrops to reduce weed and pest pressure. The total yield also tends to be higher with mixed crops compared to monocrops; since both oats and beans are harvested (together). 

Benefits 

In this intercrop, oats quickly germinate to establish soil cover, reducing (late) weed growth; and reducing aphid numbers, which also serve as virus vectors. Oats has a more ‘neutral’ impact environmentally on the crop rotation compared to other cereal crops; better suppressing weeds; even when mechanical weed control (harrowing) is not possible due to unfavourable conditions. Also, if other (cereal) crop fail, oats can compensate for this loss. 

Practical recommendation 

  • Seed mix: a good mix to start is 80-90 % of faba beans, and 30-40 % Oats. % = of usual monocrops stand density.
  • Sowing seed mix at 12 cm row distance, seeding depth 3-4 cm, 4-5 cm in sandy soil. (This is for Switzerland; and needs optimised for other countries/regions).
  • Synthetic nitrogen (N) fertiliser is not required to facilitate production/N accumulation (by legume crop).
  • Autumn-sown oats and beans will ripen at the same time. Spring-sowing requires late-maturing oat varieties for simultaneous ripening with the faba bean.
  • Oats N-content may be reduced (compared to monocropped oats), due to limited N-fertiliser use.
  • The combine harvester needs adjusted to harvest the main cash crop, i.e., faba bean.
  • The proportion of legumes in the harvest can vary (averaged between 50-60 % over the years, with large fluctuations)The proportion of oats needs optimised for your conditions by experience.
Geographical Location

Schweiz/Suisse/Svizzera

Problem                   

Climate change impacts are causing unpredictable and extreme weather across Europe. Assuring protein yield potential demands adaptive cropping strategies.

Solution                   

To use winter- and spring-sown mixtures, harvested either as grain or whole crop (silage) - depending on the climatic effects experienced.

Benefits 

Protein yield is safeguarded using whole-crop, when grain yields may be compromised., although use of whole-crop may be limited to consumptions by ruminants. Benefits are therefore easier to realise in mixed farming systems (e.g., which include cows, and sheep); and/or where whole crop ‘biorefining’ is used. 

Practical recommendation 

  • High protein yields were obtained using either:
    • winter-sown faba (field) bean and wheat harvested as whole-crops; or,
    • spring-sown pea and wheat harvested as grain.
  • The protein yields were up to 2x that achieved by average monocrops.
  • Highest protein yields were obtained without synthetic nitrogen fertiliser use (50 kg/ha avoided).
Geographical Location

United Kingdom

Problem                   

Poor growth and so yield of pulse crops such as pea (Pisum sativum L.) and field bean (Vicia faba L.) due to low levels of root nodulation as a function of low rhizobia numbers in soil.

Solution                   

Application of a molecular diagnostic method can quantify the number of pea- and bean- rhizobia in soil; with low population numbers indicating a limitation to crop performance and yield.

Benefits 

With the number of rhizobia in-soil known, this potentially yield-limiting factor can be identified or excluded. If rhizobia numbers are low, high-performing (elite) rhizobia from commercial sources should be applied to seed before sowing.

Practical recommendation 

  • Molecular diagnostics demands specific equipment, and expertise, and need carried out by professional service providers including: the Processors and Growers Research Organisation (Roger Vickers; roger@pgro.org); and/or the James Hutton Institute (pete.iannetta@hutton.ac.uk).
  • If rhizobia numbers are low a relatively low-cost remedy (even without the molecular diagnostic test), is the application of high performing (‘elite’) rhizobia to seed before sowing.
  • Elite rhizobia should be purchased from high quality commercial providers e.g., Legume Technology Ltd, www.legumetechnology.co.uk
Geographical Location

United Kingdom

Contacts

Project email

Project coordinator

  • UNIVERSIDADE CATOLICA PORTUGUESA

    Project coordinator

Project partners

  • THE JAMES HUTTON INSTITUTE

    Project partner

  • ADAS

    Project partner

  • TERRES INOVIA

    Project partner

  • SEGES INNOVATION PS

    Project partner

  • UNIVERSITA DEGLI STUDI DI PERUGIA

    Project partner

  • LEIBNIZ-ZENTRUM FUER AGRARLANDSCHAFTSFORSCHUNG

    Project partner

  • POTSDAM-INSTITUT FUR KLIMAFOLGENFORSCHUNG

    Project partner

  • UNIVERSIDADE DE AVEIRO

    Project partner

  • CREATIVE MINDS

    Project partner

  • ITC – Innovation Technology Cluster Murska Sobota

    Project partner

  • ESSRG

    Project partner

  • INSTITUT JOZEF STEFAN

    Project partner

  • DIL DEUTSCHES INSTITUT FUR LEBENSMITTELTECHNIK

    Project partner

  • AGRI KULTI

    Project partner

  • ALFRED-WEGENER-INSTITUT

    Project partner

  • ASOCIACION APRISCO DE LAS CORCHUELAS

    Project partner

  • SOLINTAGRO

    Project partner

  • AG FUTURA TECHNOLOGII DOOEL SKOPJE

    Project partner

  • ARCADIA INTERNATIONAL GEIE

    Project partner

  • EIDGENOESSISCHES DEPARTEMENT FUER WIRTSCHAFT, BILDUNG UND FORSCHUNG

    Project partner

  • Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL

    Project partner