Sections
project - Research and innovation
MIXED - Multi-actor and transdisciplinary development of efficient and resilient MIXED farming and agroforestry systems
MIXED - Multi-actor and transdisciplinary development of efficient and resilient MIXED farming and agroforestry systems
Context
MIXED explores the benefits of mixed farming and agroforestry systems (MiFAS) to climate, environment, and society in general and support the further development of such systems. The assumption is that MiFAS have the potential to be both efficient and resilient and at the same time and provide eco-system services for the benefit of society and the environment. The different networks (organic and conventional farmers) have different knowledge and experience that others can benefit from. In MIXED, we create the opportunity for farmers to learn from each other and for researchers to learn from and generate new knowledge from undertaking research together with farmers. The project works with these groups of farmers and develop networks across Europe covering a wide range of different mixed agricultural and agroforestry systems. Joint activities between researchers and farmers will create valuable scientific knowledge about the methods and systems, how best to facilitate a wider take-up of MiFAS across Europe and how policies can support this.
MiFAS come in many shapes and dimensions – operating within a field, a farm, between farms or even in an entire landscape or food-chain. The concept aims at optimizing the use of resources through collaboration and diversified production (crops, trees, animals) where the different enterprises benefit from each other. Resources can be used more efficiently in MiFAS, for example, by using crops, grasslands and woody vegetation to feed and shelter animals and fertilise fields with manure from the animals, as well as provide benefits such as sequester carbon in the system and improve biodiversity.
Objectives
MIXED supports the development of European Mixed Farming and Agroforestry Systems (MiFAS) that optimize efficiency and resource use, reduce GHG emissions, and show greater resilience to climate change by considering agronomic, technical, environmental, economic, institutional, infrastructure and social advantages and constraints. The project will assess impacts of MiFAS at farm, landscape and value chains level, in collaboration with networks of farmers, and support the transition to MiFAS through farmer-to-farmer exchange of knowledge and decision support at farm and policy level.
Objectives
see objectives in English
Activities
• Co-creation of knowledge and innovations for enhanced Mixed Farming and Agroforestry Systems (MiFAS)
• Development of efficient and resilient MiFAS and assessment of effects of MiFAS on environment, climate change resilience and other ecosystem services
• Decision-support for MiFAS to ease farmers’ transition to MiFAS
• Estimations at multiple scales of consequences of the introduction of MiFAS for the development of supporting policies
• Communication of MiFAS and dissemination of project results
Additional comments
Who: MIXED consists of 19 partners from 10 different EU countries, with Aarhus University, Department of Agroecology in Denmark, as the coordinator of the project. MIXED is using a multi-actor approach whereby various stakeholders will be involved throughout the project.
Where: MIXED involves 10 networks of farmers that practice or are in the process of transforming to MiFAS across Europe, including Austria, Denmark, France, Germany, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Switzerland, The Netherlands, and United Kingdom.
What: Systems such as different forms of organic and non-organic agroforestry, land/manure/nutrients as well as grazing exchange between arable and livestock farmers, (re)wetting of arable land in livestock arable land exchange and agrotourism are all represented in the MIXED networks.
When: The project duration is from October 2020 and 4 years onwards.
Additional information
MIXED involves networks of farmers that practice or are in the process of transforming to MiFAS. Systems such as different forms of organic and non-organic agroforestry, land/manure/nutrients as well as grazing exchange between arable and livestock farmers, (re)wetting of arable land in livestockarable land exchange and agrotourism are all represented in the MIXED networks.
Project details
- Main funding source
- Horizon 2020 (EU Research and Innovation Programme)
- Type of Horizon project
- Multi-actor project
Location
- Main geographical location
- Østjylland
EUR 6 999 508.00
Total budget
Total contributions including EU funding.
Project keyword
- Aquaculture
- Arable crops
- Organic farming
- Agro-ecology
- Crop rotation/crop diversification/dual-purpose or mixed cropping
- Biodiversity and nature
- Climate change (incl. GHG reduction, adaptation and mitigation, and other air related issues)
- Competitiveness/new business models
- Farm diversification
- Forestry
- Landscape/land management
- Soil
Resources
Audiovisual materials
- MIXED Youtube
- MIXEDInterviews E1 | Sylvain Quiédeville | FiBL
- MIXEDInterviews E2 | Fergus Younger | SAOS
- Grazing Cereals Webinar 2 | United Kingdom
- MIXEDInterviews E3 | Pip Nicholas Davies | Aberystwyth University | WP1 Leader
- MIXEDInterviews E4 | Tommy Dalgaard | Aarhus University | Project Meeting Denma…
- MIXEDInterviews E5 | Francesco Accatino | INRAE | WP3 Landscape level
- MIXEDInterviews E6 | Simon Moakes | Aberystwyth University | MiFAS
- MIXEDInterviews E7 | Miranda Meuwissen | Wageningen University | WP6 Multiscale…
- MIXEDInterviews E8 | Tommy Dalgaard | Aarhus University | Understand the MIXED …
- MIXEDInterviews E9 | Christine Watson | SRUC | Farm level
- Agroof SCOP – March 2023 with Benoit GEORGES, pig farmer
- Cupper usage – as a feast to the eyes - Austrian Network
- Sheep grazing winter cereals for winter fodder and soil quality in mixed system…
- Impact of hedgerows on crop production, soil properties and weeds in organic mi…
- Animal welfare, environmental and climate impact of organic pig-willow silvopas…
- Assessment of oak silvopastoral agroforestry systems (Montado) in Portugal
- A framework for efficiency and resilience assessment of MIXED systems
- Utilising winter forage and integrating livestock on to arable farms has many b…
- Get to know one of the H2020 MIXED network in France
- MIXEDInterviews E10 | Marie Trydeman Knudsen | Aarhus University | Value chains
- H2020 MIXED | Swiss network | New harvesting mechanization
- The Montado system and the Portuguese network of H2020 MIXED
- The management of the peatland - learn more with the German network of MIXED pr…
- Livestock and trees – learn about pigs and poplar from a Danish MIXED farmer
- Understanding MIXED farming and agroforestry systems
35 Practice Abstracts
Establishing the online platform: "Povești de Argeș" as support for encouraging partnerships and cooperation between local producers and regaining mutual trust between producers and consumers.
The platform was designed in such a way as to present, in a unitary and easy-to-follow format, the products and services offered by local operators, which would facilitate the identification of cooperation opportunities between producers as well as the unique access of consumers to the range of products and services that can be found on the territory of the Tinutul Posadelor LAG.
The process of developing the content of the platform required direct involvement of the agents of the local economy who, together with the experts of the project team, penciled the content of the platform that tells the story of local products and services. The systemic and unitary approach to the content creation process allowed the recognition and assumption of the set of common values that define the territory of the platform: respect for local traditions; quality; mutual support.
Practical recommendations to develop a platform to promote local products and services:
- Working directly with local producers to learn the story of their business
- Technical support for building the platform's digital infrastructure
- Support from a communication expert to create attractive local product stories.
The main benefits of the platform:
- Facilitating access to the full range of products and services offered by the local economy
- Creating a favorable environment for cooperation and exchange between local producers
- Assuming the set of common values that defining the platform' membership
- Encouraging consumption from local sources.
Establishing the online platform: "Povești de Argeș" as support for encouraging partnerships and cooperation between local producers and regaining mutual trust between producers and consumers.
The platform was designed in such a way as to present, in a unitary and easy-to-follow format, the products and services offered by local operators, which would facilitate the identification of cooperation opportunities between producers as well as the unique access of consumers to the range of products and services that can be found on the territory of the Tinutul Posadelor LAG.
The process of developing the content of the platform required direct involvement of the agents of the local economy who, together with the experts of the project team, penciled the content of the platform that tells the story of local products and services. The systemic and unitary approach to the content creation process allowed the recognition and assumption of the set of common values that define the territory of the platform: respect for local traditions; quality; mutual support.
Practical recommendations to develop a platform to promote local products and services:
- Working directly with local producers to learn the story of their business
- Technical support for building the platform's digital infrastructure
- Support from a communication expert to create attractive local product stories.
The main benefits of the platform:
- Facilitating access to the full range of products and services offered by the local economy
- Creating a favorable environment for cooperation and exchange between local producers
- Assuming the set of common values that defining the platform' membership
- Encouraging consumption from local sources.
After years of specialization, the reintegration of livestock into apple (or other fruit) orchards is a challenge. The following steps for the best how-to-get-started can be recommended based on the Apple Hen experience of recent years:
- Be aware of regulatory constraints (guidelines marketing channels (e.g. direct application of manure in orchards), regulatory guidelines (e.g. number of hens which is considered as threshold for “commercial egg production”)
- Provide an animal friendly mobile stable (examples in the Apple Hen handbook), the size of the barn should be adapted to the number of hens, available manpower, marketing opportunities and own consumption of eggs.
- Feed costs have a major impact on profit - consider the unfortunately often contradictory aspects of cost-effective feed and covering nutritional requirements at the same time. Make sure that the feed has a suitable structure and size in addition to adequate ingredients, depending on the type of laying hen (pullets, spent laying hens). Take care not to overstress spent laying hens: Hens are creatures of habit - after buying in, make sure the feed and drinkers are similar to those on the original farm!
- Design attractive egg cartons
- Take advantage of local training courses on organic poultry farming to get a trained eye for the needs of the laying hens.
After years of specialization, the reintegration of livestock into apple (or other fruit) orchards is a challenge. The following steps for the best how-to-get-started can be recommended based on the Apple Hen experience of recent years:
- Be aware of regulatory constraints (guidelines marketing channels (e.g. direct application of manure in orchards), regulatory guidelines (e.g. number of hens which is considered as threshold for “commercial egg production”)
- Provide an animal friendly mobile stable (examples in the Apple Hen handbook), the size of the barn should be adapted to the number of hens, available manpower, marketing opportunities and own consumption of eggs.
- Feed costs have a major impact on profit - consider the unfortunately often contradictory aspects of cost-effective feed and covering nutritional requirements at the same time. Make sure that the feed has a suitable structure and size in addition to adequate ingredients, depending on the type of laying hen (pullets, spent laying hens). Take care not to overstress spent laying hens: Hens are creatures of habit - after buying in, make sure the feed and drinkers are similar to those on the original farm!
- Design attractive egg cartons
- Take advantage of local training courses on organic poultry farming to get a trained eye for the needs of the laying hens.
To develop an understanding of the current state of mixed farming in Europe a participatory back casting approach was implemented in the MIXED project to identify possible transition pathways to future sustainable mixed farming systems. “Back casting” sets targets at a future date based on expert judgment, best available technologies, and other factors, with technical pathways subsequently developed for achieving those targets by working backwards in time towards the present. It is a problem-solving approach which enables stakeholders to set priorities, rank solutions and identify steps that need to be taken (and when) to reach desired outcomes.
The back casting workshops were conducted in all 10 countries participating in the MIXED project. In total 13 workshops took place in the UK (Scotland), Austria, France (2), Germany (2), Denmark (2), Portugal, Poland, Switzerland, Romania, and The Netherlands.
The following six broad themes of challenges were identified from the workshop outputs:
• Technical issues
• Knowledge and skills
• Farm business
• Supply chain
• Policy
• Cultural challenges
Each of these individual challenges is further divided into sub-categories. The full report and overview of categories can be found here:
https://projects.au.dk/fileadmin/projects/mixed/MIXED_D1.1.pdf
Outputs from the back casting workshops are extremely important for not only providing context for the development of mixed farming and agroforestry in Europe but they also provide alternative future pathways and scenarios for testing in the various activities in MIXED.
To develop an understanding of the current state of mixed farming in Europe a participatory back casting approach was implemented in the MIXED project to identify possible transition pathways to future sustainable mixed farming systems. “Back casting” sets targets at a future date based on expert judgment, best available technologies, and other factors, with technical pathways subsequently developed for achieving those targets by working backwards in time towards the present. It is a problem-solving approach which enables stakeholders to set priorities, rank solutions and identify steps that need to be taken (and when) to reach desired outcomes.
The back casting workshops were conducted in all 10 countries participating in the MIXED project. In total 13 workshops took place in the UK (Scotland), Austria, France (2), Germany (2), Denmark (2), Portugal, Poland, Switzerland, Romania, and The Netherlands.
The following six broad themes of challenges were identified from the workshop outputs:
• Technical issues
• Knowledge and skills
• Farm business
• Supply chain
• Policy
• Cultural challenges
Each of these individual challenges is further divided into sub-categories. The full report and overview of categories can be found here:
https://projects.au.dk/fileadmin/projects/mixed/MIXED_D1.1.pdf
Outputs from the back casting workshops are extremely important for not only providing context for the development of mixed farming and agroforestry in Europe but they also provide alternative future pathways and scenarios for testing in the various activities in MIXED.
The MIXED network in the Netherlands has focused on collaboration between dairy and arable farmers in the northeast of the Netherlands (province of Drenthe). In one case four farmers collaborate, and in another it is two farms. The farmers have been interested in how to:
1. improve their rotations through establishing a joint rotation system;
2. explore the degree of circularity in the region and how they could improve this through collaboration between farms; and
3. quantify impacts of cooperation in terms of economy as well as soil quality.
Working with the farmers on these topics resulted in the following experiences and lessons learned:
1. In this region, the sandy soils are relatively poor. Creating joint rotation schemes enables soils to recover. Joint rotation also enables to include grassland as part of the rotation. This improves the quality of grass.
2. Exploring the degree of circularity in the region increases awareness about the value of regional cooperation. Calculations can for instance be done with regard to fodder crops and manure.
3. Quantifying impacts of cooperation in terms of economy as well as soil quality gives a basis to agree on mutual payments (if any) and land exchange ratios.
In addition to the above farmers also see benefits in cooperation regarding other resources, such as contract work.
The MIXED network in the Netherlands has focused on collaboration between dairy and arable farmers in the northeast of the Netherlands (province of Drenthe). In one case four farmers collaborate, and in another it is two farms. The farmers have been interested in how to:
1. improve their rotations through establishing a joint rotation system;
2. explore the degree of circularity in the region and how they could improve this through collaboration between farms; and
3. quantify impacts of cooperation in terms of economy as well as soil quality.
Working with the farmers on these topics resulted in the following experiences and lessons learned:
1. In this region, the sandy soils are relatively poor. Creating joint rotation schemes enables soils to recover. Joint rotation also enables to include grassland as part of the rotation. This improves the quality of grass.
2. Exploring the degree of circularity in the region increases awareness about the value of regional cooperation. Calculations can for instance be done with regard to fodder crops and manure.
3. Quantifying impacts of cooperation in terms of economy as well as soil quality gives a basis to agree on mutual payments (if any) and land exchange ratios.
In addition to the above farmers also see benefits in cooperation regarding other resources, such as contract work.
In the MIXED project, a framework is needed to give a general context to all the activities, including participatory workshops, data collections, and modelling. The framework includes conceptual tools for studying the transition to Mixed Farming and Agroforestry Systems (MiFAS) and for assessing its performance. Transition to improved MiFAS is expected to be key to climate-change adaptation and to promote farming systems not only merely focused on food production, but also on other ecosystem services, while being financially attractive, efficient in resource use, and resilient to fluctuating environmental and socio-economic conditions. Assessing the performance of a MiFAS is an important condition for promoting and guiding its transition, therefore, the MIXED framework provides ways of assessing environmental, economic, and social aspects, along with aspects related to resilience and efficiency. First, the framework defines the concept of ‘mixedness’ at different levels: farm, landscape, value chain, country, Europe. Thereafter, it explains
• The transition to MiFAS at all levels along with barriers and enables to transition
• The concepts of sustainability, efficiency, and resilience.
The framework may be adapted and applied to other projects or initiatives that address transformation to more efficient and resilient production systems in complex, multidisciplinary and multidimensional system.
Read more https://projects.au.dk/fileadmin/projects/mixed/MIXED_D6.1.pdf
In the MIXED project, a framework is needed to give a general context to all the activities, including participatory workshops, data collections, and modelling. The framework includes conceptual tools for studying the transition to Mixed Farming and Agroforestry Systems (MiFAS) and for assessing its performance. Transition to improved MiFAS is expected to be key to climate-change adaptation and to promote farming systems not only merely focused on food production, but also on other ecosystem services, while being financially attractive, efficient in resource use, and resilient to fluctuating environmental and socio-economic conditions. Assessing the performance of a MiFAS is an important condition for promoting and guiding its transition, therefore, the MIXED framework provides ways of assessing environmental, economic, and social aspects, along with aspects related to resilience and efficiency. First, the framework defines the concept of ‘mixedness’ at different levels: farm, landscape, value chain, country, Europe. Thereafter, it explains
• The transition to MiFAS at all levels along with barriers and enables to transition
• The concepts of sustainability, efficiency, and resilience.
The framework may be adapted and applied to other projects or initiatives that address transformation to more efficient and resilient production systems in complex, multidisciplinary and multidimensional system.
Read more https://projects.au.dk/fileadmin/projects/mixed/MIXED_D6.1.pdf
Changeable weather patterns, including flooding and droughts, over recent years have raised Scottish farmers’ interest in sourcing alternative forage options beyond their usual grazing and silage land. Over the last 5 or 6 years, a number of arable farms in Scotland have linked up with graziers to try this approach. Winter cereals appear very resilient to being hard grazed by sheep and recover well, with experience so far showing little adverse impact on yields or crop and soil characteristics. Grazing does need to be undertaken early enough to limit potential damage to crop growing points, the latest successful experience we have is having finished grazing by mid-March. Winter cereals have been intensively “mob” grazed over a few days, or more extensively grazed over several weeks or even months. This has been done on crops that have variously been sown early, specifically to graze them early (pre-Christmas), or to hold back forward crops that were sown at typical drilling dates by grazing in the New Year. All approaches seem to work well with no obvious downsides reported. A trustworthy relationship between the arable farmer and the grazier will need to be developed, and any financial criteria agreed. Winter wheat, barley and oats have all shown excellent feed value profiles. Some Network farmers grazing their winter cereals with sheep report reductions in seed rates and N fertilizer usage and others indicate lower disease levels with potential to reduce fungicide use.
Changeable weather patterns, including flooding and droughts, over recent years have raised Scottish farmers’ interest in sourcing alternative forage options beyond their usual grazing and silage land. Over the last 5 or 6 years, a number of arable farms in Scotland have linked up with graziers to try this approach. Winter cereals appear very resilient to being hard grazed by sheep and recover well, with experience so far showing little adverse impact on yields or crop and soil characteristics. Grazing does need to be undertaken early enough to limit potential damage to crop growing points, the latest successful experience we have is having finished grazing by mid-March. Winter cereals have been intensively “mob” grazed over a few days, or more extensively grazed over several weeks or even months. This has been done on crops that have variously been sown early, specifically to graze them early (pre-Christmas), or to hold back forward crops that were sown at typical drilling dates by grazing in the New Year. All approaches seem to work well with no obvious downsides reported. A trustworthy relationship between the arable farmer and the grazier will need to be developed, and any financial criteria agreed. Winter wheat, barley and oats have all shown excellent feed value profiles. Some Network farmers grazing their winter cereals with sheep report reductions in seed rates and N fertilizer usage and others indicate lower disease levels with potential to reduce fungicide use.
Changeable weather patterns, including flooding and droughts, over recent years have raised Scottish farmers’ interest in sourcing alternative forage options beyond their usual grazing and silage land. Grazing winter cereals like barley, wheat, and oats with sheep may prove to be one such option. Trials over three years at SRUC Aberdeen, in northeast Scotland, and on participating farms, showed that these crops offer high feed value, often surpassing values for "good silage" in D-values (> 90%), metabolisable energy (> 14 MJ kg-1 DM) and crude protein (~25-30% of DM). Winter cereals also handle grazing well, showing no significant yield loss or detriment to soil health with no reduction in VESS score and evidence of increased earthworm abundance at grazed sites. Grazing can be intensive ("mob grazing") or more extended, with no major issues reported but should be performed before stem extension (GS30) to avoid damage to the growing ear. Some farmers have even seen reduced seed and fertilizer costs, and lower disease pressure, offering the potential to cut fungicide use. Importantly, on a logistical level, building trust between arable farmers and graziers, and agreeing on financial terms, is key to success. This system can help farmers improve cost efficiency, diversify forage options, and integrate livestock with cropping systems without sacrificing productivity.
Changeable weather patterns, including flooding and droughts, over recent years have raised Scottish farmers’ interest in sourcing alternative forage options beyond their usual grazing and silage land. Grazing winter cereals like barley, wheat, and oats with sheep may prove to be one such option. Trials over three years at SRUC Aberdeen, in northeast Scotland, and on participating farms, showed that these crops offer high feed value, often surpassing values for "good silage" in D-values (> 90%), metabolisable energy (> 14 MJ kg-1 DM) and crude protein (~25-30% of DM). Winter cereals also handle grazing well, showing no significant yield loss or detriment to soil health with no reduction in VESS score and evidence of increased earthworm abundance at grazed sites. Grazing can be intensive ("mob grazing") or more extended, with no major issues reported but should be performed before stem extension (GS30) to avoid damage to the growing ear. Some farmers have even seen reduced seed and fertilizer costs, and lower disease pressure, offering the potential to cut fungicide use. Importantly, on a logistical level, building trust between arable farmers and graziers, and agreeing on financial terms, is key to success. This system can help farmers improve cost efficiency, diversify forage options, and integrate livestock with cropping systems without sacrificing productivity.
The project, MIXED, has developed a supportive guide - the Handbook of indicators - to be used in the collection of farm level data across all work areas in MIXED.
The list of indicators in the Handbook includes basic agronomic and environmental indicators, and indicators developed to measure integration from the point of view of the farming system. The indicators and data collection points described in the Handbook addresses soil, crop, livestock, environmental impacts, economics, social aspects, the position of farmers in respective value chains and efficiency and resilience of Mixed farming and agroforestry systems (MiFAS).
The process of making the Handbook of indicators
Indicators of resilience and efficiency at farm level were collected and discussed among the researchers responsible for analysing mixed farming systems in the project. After extending this into a first list of indicators among the authors - the list was discussed, refined, and prioritized according to relevance for efficiency and resilience of MIFAS and the needs of project partners.
The Handbook is a base for data collection in MIXED
The Handbook is not a full and completely comprehensive list of any indicators you might think about, it is a base for data collection. In many cases there will be a need for adaptation to the individual MiFAS situation - each MIFAS has its own specificities and additional indicators may be necessary.
Read the full description of "Handbook of indicators and methodology for assessing changes in system functioning, farm management for efficiency and resilience”: https://projects.au.dk/fileadmin/ingen_mappe_valgt/PDFs/MIXED_D2.2.pdf
The project, MIXED, has developed a supportive guide - the Handbook of indicators - to be used in the collection of farm level data across all work areas in MIXED.
The list of indicators in the Handbook includes basic agronomic and environmental indicators, and indicators developed to measure integration from the point of view of the farming system. The indicators and data collection points described in the Handbook addresses soil, crop, livestock, environmental impacts, economics, social aspects, the position of farmers in respective value chains and efficiency and resilience of Mixed farming and agroforestry systems (MiFAS).
The process of making the Handbook of indicators
Indicators of resilience and efficiency at farm level were collected and discussed among the researchers responsible for analysing mixed farming systems in the project. After extending this into a first list of indicators among the authors - the list was discussed, refined, and prioritized according to relevance for efficiency and resilience of MIFAS and the needs of project partners.
The Handbook is a base for data collection in MIXED
The Handbook is not a full and completely comprehensive list of any indicators you might think about, it is a base for data collection. In many cases there will be a need for adaptation to the individual MiFAS situation - each MIFAS has its own specificities and additional indicators may be necessary.
Read the full description of "Handbook of indicators and methodology for assessing changes in system functioning, farm management for efficiency and resilience”: https://projects.au.dk/fileadmin/ingen_mappe_valgt/PDFs/MIXED_D2.2.pdf
Combining wide hedgerows with pasture-based livestock rearing in agroforestry makes a more diverse system. The true biodiversity of such system will not only be the species sown and planted on the area, but the sum of species supported in the habitat.
Ongoing observational studies of bird species on a Danish organic pig farm with agroforestry shows that trees do increase the diversity and number of breeding birds in the area. The observations found both bird species associated with trees, and bird species associated with open areas. Providing wide hedgerows does not only benefit the livestock with shade, skin care and enhance exploration opportunities. Also, the natural biodiversity benefits from the diverse environment supporting more insects and bird species.
Agroforestry will in general improve biodiversity compared to monoculture farmland practices. However, the type and management of agroforestry will have a great impact on the true effect, as a tall monoculture forest with nonnative tree species will support relatively few species. A biodiversity high impact hedgerow should contain a variety of native tree species. If same species are planted in clusters, they will support each other and limit the management of nearby faster growing trees. Furthermore, clustering the trees will make a larger habitat for species specific insects and birds. The recommended size of clusters will depend on the chosen species, e.g. smaller and/or slow-growing trees and bushes should have bigger clusters, were as fast-growing trees have less demand for clustering. Biodiversity high impact hedgerows can still contain some fast-growing nonnative species for the sake of fast implementation, nurse trees and providing high value habitat for the livestock.
Combining wide hedgerows with pasture-based livestock rearing in agroforestry makes a more diverse system. The true biodiversity of such system will not only be the species sown and planted on the area, but the sum of species supported in the habitat.
Ongoing observational studies of bird species on a Danish organic pig farm with agroforestry shows that trees do increase the diversity and number of breeding birds in the area. The observations found both bird species associated with trees, and bird species associated with open areas. Providing wide hedgerows does not only benefit the livestock with shade, skin care and enhance exploration opportunities. Also, the natural biodiversity benefits from the diverse environment supporting more insects and bird species.
Agroforestry will in general improve biodiversity compared to monoculture farmland practices. However, the type and management of agroforestry will have a great impact on the true effect, as a tall monoculture forest with nonnative tree species will support relatively few species. A biodiversity high impact hedgerow should contain a variety of native tree species. If same species are planted in clusters, they will support each other and limit the management of nearby faster growing trees. Furthermore, clustering the trees will make a larger habitat for species specific insects and birds. The recommended size of clusters will depend on the chosen species, e.g. smaller and/or slow-growing trees and bushes should have bigger clusters, were as fast-growing trees have less demand for clustering. Biodiversity high impact hedgerows can still contain some fast-growing nonnative species for the sake of fast implementation, nurse trees and providing high value habitat for the livestock.
In Denmark, MIXED is working with a subgroup of 8-15 farmers, practicing a mix of livestock and crop production, situated in a watershed with shallow estuaries and groundwater reservoirs for drinking water extraction, vulnerable to nitrogen leaching (168,000 Ha), where farmers are required to reduce the nitrate leaching significantly. Together with MIXED they will investigate ways of doing that with focus on a new biorefinery technology combined with biogas production and sustainable grassland management.
The bio-refinery technology can transform grass to a high-quality protein, e.g. to be used for a growing organic pig and poultry production (SuperGrassPork) independent of imported soybean based protein, and with two by-products - a fibre-pulp for ruminant fodder, and a ‘juice’ that can also be used for biogas production and bio-based fertilisers for fodder and cash crops. The group of farmers are part of a larger initiative – a collaboration between Aarhus University, local municipalities, farmers and bio-based industries, with the objective to support local food production, a more circular economy, and at the same time protect environment and reduce climate impacts.
It is expected that MIXED will help farmers to reduce the nitrate leaching, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, while increasing efficiency as well as resilience by reducing the areas with cereals and replace it with grass and clover grass for a more diverse range of products, and other types of land use. Thereby it can serve as an enabler for a more sustainable agricultural production, including potentials for more organic farming, and a more diverse agricultural landscapes.
Read more: https://cutt.ly/7DUgqcE
In Denmark, MIXED is working with a subgroup of 8-15 farmers, practicing a mix of livestock and crop production, situated in a watershed with shallow estuaries and groundwater reservoirs for drinking water extraction, vulnerable to nitrogen leaching (168,000 Ha), where farmers are required to reduce the nitrate leaching significantly. Together with MIXED they will investigate ways of doing that with focus on a new biorefinery technology combined with biogas production and sustainable grassland management.
The bio-refinery technology can transform grass to a high-quality protein, e.g. to be used for a growing organic pig and poultry production (SuperGrassPork) independent of imported soybean based protein, and with two by-products - a fibre-pulp for ruminant fodder, and a ‘juice’ that can also be used for biogas production and bio-based fertilisers for fodder and cash crops. The group of farmers are part of a larger initiative – a collaboration between Aarhus University, local municipalities, farmers and bio-based industries, with the objective to support local food production, a more circular economy, and at the same time protect environment and reduce climate impacts.
It is expected that MIXED will help farmers to reduce the nitrate leaching, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, while increasing efficiency as well as resilience by reducing the areas with cereals and replace it with grass and clover grass for a more diverse range of products, and other types of land use. Thereby it can serve as an enabler for a more sustainable agricultural production, including potentials for more organic farming, and a more diverse agricultural landscapes.
Read more: https://cutt.ly/7DUgqcE
Agroforestry systems for pig farms represent 1% of pig farms in France. But under social and policy pressure, the obligation of free-range becomes more and more present in certified productions. But a single pasture without tree poses different questions in terms of resilience: lack of animal protection, problem of soil erosion, lack of intrinsic forage resources… All farmers are concerned by the problem of protecting trees in the presence of pigs, whatever the density of pigs by hectare. It also concerns all kind of trees: young trees plantation or mature trees, alone, in hedge or in clump. During the project, we realised some surveys in different regions and tested some new kinds of protection, such as the Cactus Protector, produced by a Spanish enterprise. all farmers are concerned by the problem of protecting trees in the presence of pigs. The cost depends of the fence size. A fence height of 70 cm seems sufficient, but with a circumference of 1m60 for young trees at least. It cost less than 10 euros but you have to add the stems (3 units). For the mature trees, a height of 40 cm could be enough to protect the bark.
Agroforestry systems for pig farms represent 1% of pig farms in France. But under social and policy pressure, the obligation of free-range becomes more and more present in certified productions. But a single pasture without tree poses different questions in terms of resilience: lack of animal protection, problem of soil erosion, lack of intrinsic forage resources… All farmers are concerned by the problem of protecting trees in the presence of pigs, whatever the density of pigs by hectare. It also concerns all kind of trees: young trees plantation or mature trees, alone, in hedge or in clump. During the project, we realised some surveys in different regions and tested some new kinds of protection, such as the Cactus Protector, produced by a Spanish enterprise. all farmers are concerned by the problem of protecting trees in the presence of pigs. The cost depends of the fence size. A fence height of 70 cm seems sufficient, but with a circumference of 1m60 for young trees at least. It cost less than 10 euros but you have to add the stems (3 units). For the mature trees, a height of 40 cm could be enough to protect the bark.
In Portugal the MIXED project is implemented by ISA-UL, CONSULAI and a network of farmers practicing Mixed Farming and Agroforestry Systems, in particular the Montado, a UNESCO protected Mediterranean mixed system, comprising agroforestry activities and extensive livestock production. The Montado system is dominated by scattered oak trees (Q. suber, Q. ilex, Q. rotundifolia), associated with pastures, forages, or feed crops. The livestock (beef cattle, sheep, goats and/or pigs) is characterised by low stocking rates, adapted to the poor soils and unfavourable climate conditions.
Farmers joined the MIXED network in Portugal with a motivation of sharing experiences and improving their practices. Climate change and soil degradation, as well as poor crop management practices, have opened the floor to the decline of the Montado, due to low organic matter contents, soil erosion, and the proliferation of pests. A new paradigm is required to adapt to climate change, while ensuring the economic viability and environmental sustainability of the farms. The PT network aims at restoring and modernising the Montado ecosystem, by working in collaboration with farmers, researchers, policymakers and other stakeholders. The main objective is to find solutions for the future and develop more sustainable management practices, with the interests of stakeholders at all levels of the value chain.
The network integrates 15 farms, with over 20.000 hectares of farmland in the Alentejo region, south of Portugal. The aim is to share experiences and improve practices to be both efficient and resilient, increasing economic returns and providing eco-system services for the benefit of society and the environment. Read more: https://cutt.ly/IDUplhe
In Portugal the MIXED project is implemented by ISA-UL, CONSULAI and a network of farmers practicing Mixed Farming and Agroforestry Systems, in particular the Montado, a UNESCO protected Mediterranean mixed system, comprising agroforestry activities and extensive livestock production. The Montado system is dominated by scattered oak trees (Q. suber, Q. ilex, Q. rotundifolia), associated with pastures, forages, or feed crops. The livestock (beef cattle, sheep, goats and/or pigs) is characterised by low stocking rates, adapted to the poor soils and unfavourable climate conditions.
Farmers joined the MIXED network in Portugal with a motivation of sharing experiences and improving their practices. Climate change and soil degradation, as well as poor crop management practices, have opened the floor to the decline of the Montado, due to low organic matter contents, soil erosion, and the proliferation of pests. A new paradigm is required to adapt to climate change, while ensuring the economic viability and environmental sustainability of the farms. The PT network aims at restoring and modernising the Montado ecosystem, by working in collaboration with farmers, researchers, policymakers and other stakeholders. The main objective is to find solutions for the future and develop more sustainable management practices, with the interests of stakeholders at all levels of the value chain.
The network integrates 15 farms, with over 20.000 hectares of farmland in the Alentejo region, south of Portugal. The aim is to share experiences and improve practices to be both efficient and resilient, increasing economic returns and providing eco-system services for the benefit of society and the environment. Read more: https://cutt.ly/IDUplhe
In the MIXED project, the hypothesis is that the development of more Mixed Farming and Agroforestry Systems (MiFAS) is key to delivering multiple needs. Researchers, advisors and farmers will work together with other actors in the rural environment to demonstrate this in selected collaborative networks of farmers in 10 countries across Europe, serving as showcases for successful implementation of MiFAS.
Multi-actor approach: In each of the 10 countries the project is implemented by a national team of researchers, a network coordinator (NGO, farmers’ organization, or consultancy), and a network/group of farmers practicing. Project activities aimed at developing MiFAS involves research pilots at farm level as well as landscape level and value chains. Furthermore, the activities aimed at developing decision support for farm level as well as policy level will in the process address stakeholders at multiple levels.
Participatory approach: Co-creation of knowledge and innovations is fundamental in MIXED. The project involves a series of workshops with the networks of farmers focussed on bottlenecks and solutions. Through the workshops small-scale action research projects supporting the development and implementation of MiFAS will be identified and implemented by farmers.
Farmer-to-farmer dissemination: To facilitate that the knowledge generated by farmers will be made available to other farmers, the national teams will document this in videos, photos and storytelling made available at the project website and through various social media as well as through field days and stakeholder workshops.
Read more on co-creation of knowledge and innovation in MIXED: https://cutt.ly/yDUi2SM
In the MIXED project, the hypothesis is that the development of more Mixed Farming and Agroforestry Systems (MiFAS) is key to delivering multiple needs. Researchers, advisors and farmers will work together with other actors in the rural environment to demonstrate this in selected collaborative networks of farmers in 10 countries across Europe, serving as showcases for successful implementation of MiFAS.
Multi-actor approach: In each of the 10 countries the project is implemented by a national team of researchers, a network coordinator (NGO, farmers’ organization, or consultancy), and a network/group of farmers practicing. Project activities aimed at developing MiFAS involves research pilots at farm level as well as landscape level and value chains. Furthermore, the activities aimed at developing decision support for farm level as well as policy level will in the process address stakeholders at multiple levels.
Participatory approach: Co-creation of knowledge and innovations is fundamental in MIXED. The project involves a series of workshops with the networks of farmers focussed on bottlenecks and solutions. Through the workshops small-scale action research projects supporting the development and implementation of MiFAS will be identified and implemented by farmers.
Farmer-to-farmer dissemination: To facilitate that the knowledge generated by farmers will be made available to other farmers, the national teams will document this in videos, photos and storytelling made available at the project website and through various social media as well as through field days and stakeholder workshops.
Read more on co-creation of knowledge and innovation in MIXED: https://cutt.ly/yDUi2SM
The project MIXED has completed an initial introductory review of research projects and the wider literature on the topic of mixed farming and agroforestry in Europe.
The result of this thorough literature study is a comprehensive catalogue, which can be used as a go-to resource for the further work in the MIXED project. The catalogue can also be used as a solid starting point by other projects within mixed farming and agroforestry as a field of research.
The present catalogue contains a database of literature bibliography of 882 records and a Project Matrix of 52 projects and their focus areas. Even though the content of the database is comprehensive, the catalogue cannot be considered as a complete list.
A point worth paying attention to when reviewing the existing literature, is that mixed farming and agroforestry is a very broad concept and the complexity surrounding its definition can pose challenges on the selection between what is included and what is not. As an example, organic farming systems often are within the definition of a mixed system but may not identify themselves as such. For that reason, there may be further relevant research projects that are not included in the present catalogue – not because such research projects were discarded, but because of differences in terminology and categorisation and therefore may not have been identified.
Furthermore, 22 projects from France were discarded from the analysis, because the dissemination of the research projects were not available in English, which highlights another potential barrier for knowledgebase sharing in the broad field of mixed farming and agroforestry.
Read more https://projects.au.dk/fileadmin/projects/mixed/MIXED_D3.1.pdf
The project MIXED has completed an initial introductory review of research projects and the wider literature on the topic of mixed farming and agroforestry in Europe.
The result of this thorough literature study is a comprehensive catalogue, which can be used as a go-to resource for the further work in the MIXED project. The catalogue can also be used as a solid starting point by other projects within mixed farming and agroforestry as a field of research.
The present catalogue contains a database of literature bibliography of 882 records and a Project Matrix of 52 projects and their focus areas. Even though the content of the database is comprehensive, the catalogue cannot be considered as a complete list.
A point worth paying attention to when reviewing the existing literature, is that mixed farming and agroforestry is a very broad concept and the complexity surrounding its definition can pose challenges on the selection between what is included and what is not. As an example, organic farming systems often are within the definition of a mixed system but may not identify themselves as such. For that reason, there may be further relevant research projects that are not included in the present catalogue – not because such research projects were discarded, but because of differences in terminology and categorisation and therefore may not have been identified.
Furthermore, 22 projects from France were discarded from the analysis, because the dissemination of the research projects were not available in English, which highlights another potential barrier for knowledgebase sharing in the broad field of mixed farming and agroforestry.
Read more https://projects.au.dk/fileadmin/projects/mixed/MIXED_D3.1.pdf
Test and demonstration of adapted harvesting mechanization:
1. Bosco olivespeed - is a net-harvester, originally developed for olive harvest. Michael Fässler a MIXED-corefarmer proposed to import and test this harvester for the Swiss MIXED system due to the following reasons: Big increase in efficiency, replacement of hand-harvest; High fruit quality due to soft catch on the net; Manageable by few people (3-4); Can be used in steep terrain.
2. STIHL SP-452 - Motorized, portable shaker by STIHL was not known by the Swiss network and presented at a MIXED corefarmer-meeting. Several corefarmers showed interest in testing this machine. Allows shaking of single trees/branches by one person. Could supplement hand-harvesting and increase efficiency of smaller scale production.
Demonstration day at Ruedi Obrist’s farm on the 7. of August: The “bosco olivespeed” and the “STIHL SP 452” were showed and demonstrated on young high-stem plum trees. Interested Farmers were invited by the corefarmers directly and via Hochstamm Suisse. Even though the field season was full on, 15-20 interested farmers showed up. Several trees were harvested, questions asked and already further lending/exchange of the machines was organized by the farmers.
Conclusion: The new mechanization allows harvesting with small groups of 3-5 people (big mechanization needs 15-20 people and is only efficient for big plots); “Bosco olivespeed” with correct tires can be used in steep terrain where by now only harvest by hand was feasibl; Trees up to 10-15 years can be harvested, older trees are probably too big for the “bosco olivespeed”; STIHL SP 452 caused damage to the bark of young plum and cherry trees. Improvements are developed and tested.
Test and demonstration of adapted harvesting mechanization:
1. Bosco olivespeed - is a net-harvester, originally developed for olive harvest. Michael Fässler a MIXED-corefarmer proposed to import and test this harvester for the Swiss MIXED system due to the following reasons: Big increase in efficiency, replacement of hand-harvest; High fruit quality due to soft catch on the net; Manageable by few people (3-4); Can be used in steep terrain.
2. STIHL SP-452 - Motorized, portable shaker by STIHL was not known by the Swiss network and presented at a MIXED corefarmer-meeting. Several corefarmers showed interest in testing this machine. Allows shaking of single trees/branches by one person. Could supplement hand-harvesting and increase efficiency of smaller scale production.
Demonstration day at Ruedi Obrist’s farm on the 7. of August: The “bosco olivespeed” and the “STIHL SP 452” were showed and demonstrated on young high-stem plum trees. Interested Farmers were invited by the corefarmers directly and via Hochstamm Suisse. Even though the field season was full on, 15-20 interested farmers showed up. Several trees were harvested, questions asked and already further lending/exchange of the machines was organized by the farmers.
Conclusion: The new mechanization allows harvesting with small groups of 3-5 people (big mechanization needs 15-20 people and is only efficient for big plots); “Bosco olivespeed” with correct tires can be used in steep terrain where by now only harvest by hand was feasibl; Trees up to 10-15 years can be harvested, older trees are probably too big for the “bosco olivespeed”; STIHL SP 452 caused damage to the bark of young plum and cherry trees. Improvements are developed and tested.
Traditional orchards and old fruit varieties are riches in themselves! They provide us with wonderful fruit, culinary value, beautify our home gardens and landscape, and provide habitats for many animals, thus contributing to the conservation of increasingly endangered species. It is therefore worth considering establishing a traditional orchard with old fruit varieties.
The first step in setting up an orchard is planning it. Where is the best place to plant the trees, at what distance from each other, in what arrangement? We only plant trees once in many years, so this first step requires a particularly high level of attention. In this case, it is better not to be self-taught and to seek the advice of an experienced planter. This will ensure that the seedlings go to the right place and enjoy good growing conditions. It is important, for example, to consider the position of the trees in relation to housing or outbuildings, as well as the protection of the trees from strong winds or frost.
The choice of varieties should be based on the end use of the fruit and the adaptation of the variety to the climatic conditions of the region. Let us ask ourselves, what do we want to use the fruit for? To eat fresh? For preserves? Or for drying? Each variety has its own properties, and depending on what we want to use the fruit for, we have a choice of different varieties.
In Poland, there are more than 500 varieties of apple, so there is plenty to choose from! There are orchard nurseries and associations which specialise in the cultivation of old fruit varieties and offer grafting scions or buds. But it is also worth going into the field and looking for old, sometimes abandoned fruit trees, from which scions and buds can also be taken and grafted onto younger rootstocks.
Traditional orchards and old fruit varieties are riches in themselves! They provide us with wonderful fruit, culinary value, beautify our home gardens and landscape, and provide habitats for many animals, thus contributing to the conservation of increasingly endangered species. It is therefore worth considering establishing a traditional orchard with old fruit varieties.
The first step in setting up an orchard is planning it. Where is the best place to plant the trees, at what distance from each other, in what arrangement? We only plant trees once in many years, so this first step requires a particularly high level of attention. In this case, it is better not to be self-taught and to seek the advice of an experienced planter. This will ensure that the seedlings go to the right place and enjoy good growing conditions. It is important, for example, to consider the position of the trees in relation to housing or outbuildings, as well as the protection of the trees from strong winds or frost.
The choice of varieties should be based on the end use of the fruit and the adaptation of the variety to the climatic conditions of the region. Let us ask ourselves, what do we want to use the fruit for? To eat fresh? For preserves? Or for drying? Each variety has its own properties, and depending on what we want to use the fruit for, we have a choice of different varieties.
In Poland, there are more than 500 varieties of apple, so there is plenty to choose from! There are orchard nurseries and associations which specialise in the cultivation of old fruit varieties and offer grafting scions or buds. But it is also worth going into the field and looking for old, sometimes abandoned fruit trees, from which scions and buds can also be taken and grafted onto younger rootstocks.
The farmers in the MIXED network in the province of Drenthe in the Netherlands have already been collaborating for many years; their collaboration is based on mutual trust and principles of sharing, i.e. it is not based on purely financial interests.
Best practices:
1. Farmers jointly discuss new rotation options, such as crops that can be used for building materials.
2. Farmers openly discuss possible positive and negative implications of joint rotations, such as implications for soil quality.
Challenges:
1. Most extension experts and consultants are specialized into one sector, e.g dairy farming. There is insufficient knowledge on mixed farming systems.
2. With joint crop rotations, crop management planning is becoming more complex.
Opportunities:
1. Regional cooperation between dairy and arable farmers can fit in the concept of regional circularity. The concept of regional cooperation therefore receives increasing attention from society and policy.
Farmers perceive programs such as MIXED as very useful as they enable to work on tailor-made research questions, such as economic and soil quality implications of joint rotations in the NL network
The farmers in the MIXED network in the province of Drenthe in the Netherlands have already been collaborating for many years; their collaboration is based on mutual trust and principles of sharing, i.e. it is not based on purely financial interests.
Best practices:
1. Farmers jointly discuss new rotation options, such as crops that can be used for building materials.
2. Farmers openly discuss possible positive and negative implications of joint rotations, such as implications for soil quality.
Challenges:
1. Most extension experts and consultants are specialized into one sector, e.g dairy farming. There is insufficient knowledge on mixed farming systems.
2. With joint crop rotations, crop management planning is becoming more complex.
Opportunities:
1. Regional cooperation between dairy and arable farmers can fit in the concept of regional circularity. The concept of regional cooperation therefore receives increasing attention from society and policy.
Farmers perceive programs such as MIXED as very useful as they enable to work on tailor-made research questions, such as economic and soil quality implications of joint rotations in the NL network
Contacts
Project coordinator
-
AARHUS UNIVERSITET
Project coordinator
Project partners
-
AARHUS UNIVERSITET
Project partner
-
FiBL, Switzerland
Project partner
-
Aberystwyth University
Project partner
-
Wageningen University
Project partner
-
SRUC, UK
Project partner
-
INRAE, France
Project partner
-
IUNG-PIB, Poland
Project partner
-
Institute of Agricultural Economics, Romania
Project partner
Institute of Agricultural Economics, Romania - Camelia Gavrilescu cami_gavrilescu@yahoo.com Researcher -
Innovation Centre for Organic Farming (ICOEL)
Project partner
-
AGROOF, France
Project partner
-
CONSULAI, Portugal
Project partner
-
ISA-UL, Portugal
Project partner
-
SAOS, UK
Project partner
-
IFLS, Germany
Project partner
-
FSK Juchowo, Poland
Project partner
-
ARGE Donaumoss, Germany
Project partner
-
Hochstamm Suisse, Switzerland
Project partner
-
GAL-TP, Romania
Project partner