Evaluation of best practice projects from Tuscany, 2014-2022 RDP, second catalogue

Evaluation of the 2014–2022 RDP of the region of Tuscany required the production of two catalogues of best practices (Report D1 in 2021 and Report D2 in 2023). Their aim is to highlight the projects considered most significant and with the best results to substantiate assessment findings from ongoing and ex post evaluations.

The analysis of best practices (BP) is presented as an evaluation tool for public policies seeking innovation and positive change. The catalogue strengthens the description and communication of programme results, and it encourages reflection on positive experiences to generate knowledge for the next programming cycle. Through BP analysis, the evaluation process contributes both to reporting on programme action and to improving future programming based on lessons learned.

A qualitative-quantitative approach is used, combining both primary and secondary data and framed in a 'grounded theory' evaluation approach. BP projects are identified and analysed through case studies using judgement parameters proposed by the evaluator and shared with the Managing Authority. This approach is intended to provide examples to potential beneficiaries on optimal resource use and to add qualitative evidence supporting the overall judgement on the RDP. It also allows strengths and weaknesses of programming aspects (e.g. purpose of support, bureaucratic process, timing) to be highlighted through beneficiary testimony. A limitation is that part of this survey was conducted remotely. As a result, where the on-site visit was missing, the methodology could not be applied optimally.

Considering the overall effectiveness of the interventions, the evaluation concludes that most of the 40 selected BPs achieve high levels of relevance (29), reproducibility (23) and effectiveness (23). Positive ratings are mainly related to the ability to stimulate new initiatives and to respond concretely to market, supply chain, and territorial problems. Medium-high scores for innovation (20), sustainability (20) and integration (21) are associated with initiatives testing new development solutions compatible with local specificities and opportunities. During observation, the evaluator noted that beneficiaries are not always fully aware of their obligations for monitoring and evaluation. There can be limited focus on making RDP-supported investments visible through programme communication tools or through the catalogue, as many beneficiaries rely on their own channels (especially social media).

Recommendations emphasise using best practices to refine calls for proposals and guide future interventions, simplifying procedures, and maintaining high‑quality data systems. Greater dissemination of results and learning from successes and failures is advised, alongside strengthening evaluation culture through awareness, capacity building and territorial coordination. A third catalogue and more in‑person data collection are also recommended.