EU CAP Network Workshop on LEADER and Social Resilience
Over 70 LEADER stakeholders came together to discuss LAG’s role in strengthening social resilience in rural communities, and share examples of crisis preparedness and response.
- Programming period: 2023-2027
Page contents
- Date: 16-17 June 2026
- Location: Kaunas, Lithuania
- Organisers: EU CAP Network (CAP Implementation Contact Point)
- Participants: 71 participants from 23 EU Member States, including Local Action Groups (LAGs), Managing Authorities (MAs), National Networks (NN), university and research, local authorities, non-governmental organisations, and the European Commission (EC) - DG AGRI.
- Outcomes: Sharing of experiences and relevant initiatives among participants; in-depth understanding of the concepts relating to social resilience, disinformation, and crisis preparedness and response linked to security and civil defence preparedness, climate change, disinformation, and migration; collection of 14 good practice examples (posters) and summary of relevant background literature, networking and new contacts made by participants for future cooperation.
Web page: EU CAP Network Workshop on LEADER and Social Resilience | EU CAP Network
Day 1 (16 June 2026)
Welcome and introduction
The event focused on LAGs’ role in strengthening social resilience in rural communities in the context of the ‘triple challenge’ - ecological, economic, and social - and allowed the participants to share experiences of LAGs and civil society that are effectively and efficiently using both internal (improved local governance, local networking, community engagement) and external (including funding, cooperation with local, regional, national authorities and other LAGs) resources to improve social resilience, crisis preparedness, and crisis response.
Participants were welcomed by Susan Grieve (EU CAP Network) and Kristina Indriošienė (Ministry of Agriculture, Lithuania), who stressed that in Lithuania social resilience is not an abstract concept, but part of daily reality, as rural areas are facing various challenges. She noted that rural social resilience is about building trust and working together, and LEADER has a considerable role in making this happen.
Peter Toth (EU CAP Network) explained the focus of the event – on crises related to climate events, migration and displacement, security and civil defence, and disinformation – as well as the planned working method. He stressed that the main aim of the workshop was to give participants the opportunity to learn and prepare for actual crises.
Introduction, Peter Toth, EU CAP Network
(PDF – 790.77 Ko)
Interaction among the participants started early, with a short ice-breaker conducted by Veronika Korcekova (EU CAP Network), asking participants which keywords they associate with the concept of social resilience. ‘Community’, ‘cooperation’, ‘sustainability’ and ‘safety’ were the most frequently mentioned words. In terms of expected ‘take-aways’, most participants were looking for practical examples and new contacts for potential partnerships and cooperation.
Iwona Lisztwan (EC - DG AGRI, Unit B.3.) delivered a presentation on framing and context of the issue. Quoting the EC President, Ms Lisztwan emphasised that Europe has been ‘in a fight’ in recent years, facing multiple crises related to health, security, and climate change, coupled with economic consequences and the negative impact of disinformation on trust and social capital. She emphasised the role of LEADER and its networks - which number more than 120 000 members across Europe - in addressing these challenges, particularly through cooperation and the exchange of experiences.
Overview and context, Iwona Lisztwan, DG AGRI, European Commission
(PDF – 513.88 Ko)
Paolo Cesarini (European Digital Media Observatory (EDMO), European University Institute) explained the ‘disinformation’ phenomenon as part of an ‘information disorder’ with a potential to cause public harm by eroding trust in institutions, changing the public perception of reality, and impacting crisis response by societies. Countering disinformation first requires a clear understanding of its actors (those who produce disinformation), the techniques it uses, its content, reach and effects. A successful response requires a ‘whole-of-society’ approach, with free media, a resilient democracy, better prepared public institutions, and more online transparency. EDMO is supporting and coordinating fact-checking activities, and has a wide reach thanks to several hubs across Europe and collaborations with partner institutions and civil society organisations.
Understanding disinformation, Paolo Cesarini, European Digital Media Observatory (EDMO) and School of Transnational Governance, European University Institute
(PDF – 1.95 Mo)
Prof. Elena Pisani (Associate Professor with the University of Padova, Italy) provided an overview of relevant concepts linked to social resilience, crisis preparedness and crisis responses. Communities’ capacity to withstand, adapt to, and transform in response to various crises is key, while institutions and their supportive relationships to communities also play an important role. Social resilience is not a static characteristic but a dynamic process, where communities can make use of different types of capital (social, cultural, human, economic, natural, or built) to respond to stresses or shocks of different intensities or durations. Social resilience can also be examined through the lens of the various stages that communities go through when confronted with stressors or crises: preparing, withstanding, recovering, and adapting or transforming.
Social resilience, crisis preparedness and crisis response – an overview of relevant concepts, Professor Elena Pisani, University of Padova, Italy
(PDF – 1.82 Mo)
Panel discussion
Marie Permingeat (EU CAP Network) moderated a panel discussion during which stakeholders shared their views.
Jarosław Rżany (LAG Suwalsko Sejneńska, Poland) explained how his LAG’s approach to social resilience has changed in recent years due to its geographical location at a sensitive border area (the Suwałki Corridor), as well as various other crises. Since COVID-19, resilience and preparedness have become the centre of the LAG’s activities, and this has continued following the arrival of Ukrainian refugees due to the war. The LAG’s Local Development Strategy for the 2023-2027 period focuses on social resilience, and includes specific actions related to training and capacity building for crisis preparedness, energy security, and practical skills, as well as a strong emphasis on working directly with people.
Santa Harjo-Ozoliņa (LAG Biedrība Alūksnes lauku partnerība, Latvia) explained that in her LAG’s territory – in a region bordering Russia - civil defence has become a part of everyday life since the war in Ukraine broke out. Preparedness and the understanding that safety depends on one’s own initiative are key. The LAG contributes to the development of the civil defence system in Latvia through awareness-raising, training sessions, workshops, and cooperation. It also contributes to coordinated crisis responses by mapping relevant local resources and organising training in local communities.
According to Leila Benabdallah (Mediterranean Youth Council, France), different organisations, such as LAGs and youth organisations, should work together to deal with the multiple and interconnected crises we are facing. In her experience, what starts as an environmental crisis – working on water scarcity, access to water, and illegal wells in the Mediterranean – can become a social issue affecting whole communities. Working in silos is not an option.
Prof. Elena Pisani noted that multi-level governance aspects should be part of improving the social resilience and crisis preparedness of local rural communities. The local, national, and also the EU levels have key roles to play in providing the appropriate institutional responses.
Both Santa Harjo Ozolina and Jarosław Rżany emphasised the importance of cooperation and looking at one’s territory through a regional lens. Latvian LAGs are working to improve Eastern Border Cooperation within the Baltic area, while the Suwalsko Sejneńska LAG established cross-border cooperation with a neighbouring region in Lithuania. They are currently working to understand the health care systems better on both sides of the border, and plan to extend this cooperation to civil defence systems.
The panellists emphasised that where local rural communities have trust in the LAG and the authorities, disinformation is not a major issue. In case disinformation starts spreading in small rural communities, direct and private connections are important, as well as following the LAG’s advice to refer to the authorities’ and municipal official websites. Providing immediate crisis responses is key, but this must be coupled with long-term solutions.
Social resilience, crisis preparedness and crisis response – Getting to know each other, sharing experiences
Working in groups, participants mapped their experiences related to social resilience, crisis preparedness, and crisis responses. Specific initiatives and projects were discussed in terms of the stage they related to (prepare, withstand, recover, or adapt) and the resources used (local or external). Jointly reflecting on the examples presented, participants also discussed how relevant initiatives could have been better developed or implemented.
The initiatives discussed included: crisis response planning and the Training: Hope + Courage Collective (Ireland), EcoReady Masuria (Poland), the Daia Climate Adaptation Pilot Project (Romania), and other initiatives by LAGs related to security, the response to the COVID-19 crisis, and social and integration services for refugees.
Check the posters available on the event page for more details on various initiatives by LAGs.
Project visits
Participants in the event visited two LAG territories, where they were introduced to a variety of initiatives.
At the Vilkaviškis LAG, which borders the Russian Federation, social resilience and rapid response capacity are particularly important for local communities. Within this area, LEADER support is used to renovate community buildings, which can be adapted into multifunctional facilities in times of crisis. Additionally, local communities actively cooperate with the Red Cross, jointly organising training on emergency preparedness.
In the Gudkaimis Community, an impressive half of the village residents are members of the community organisation. The community established an independent living home for people with various addictions, a community house with a small museum, and a children’s day care centre. They also provide landscaping and maintenance services (e.g. grass cutting, ploughing gardens, snow removal in winter).
Sūduva LAG, located near the Suwałki Corridor, also places strong emphasis on strengthening community resilience. Bagotoji Community established a multifunctional centre, built a football stadium, founded a children’s day care centre, and provides transport services.
A local brass band demonstrated how culture could contribute to social resilience and community cohesion. The band has been active for more than 60 years and provides musical education and meaningful free-time activity to local children, serving as the main hub for the 11th generation of local musicians.
Day 2 (17 June 2026)
LEADER and LAGs in action – World Café
On the second day, participants discussed social resilience, crisis preparedness and crisis responses using practical examples of real initiatives and projects. The format allowed participants to contribute to discussions around four themes. A short summary of the conclusions in each theme is presented below. Detailed information about each initiative is available in individual posters here.
Climate crisis and extreme weather events:
- Alberto Santos (LAG Alentejo Central, Portugal) talked about the involvement of rural youth in supporting climate resilience;
- Szilvia Bencze (LAG Homoród-Küküllő LEADER Association, Romania) presented a climate adaptation pilot project (related to water retention) in Daia.
Additionally, LAGs shared their own examples of how they play an active role in climate resilience. In relation to climate adaptation, examples include using ERASMUS+ funding for non-formal education on climate protection, or convincing mayors to cooperate on developing climate adaptation strategies. In the case of extreme weather events, LAGs in various countries helped support fire prevention or first response to floods, including coordination or fundraising.
Security and civil defence:
- Jeanette Uner (LAG Leader Folkungaland, Sweden) described her LAGs’ activities related to civil emergency capacity building;
- Jolanta Wrotkowska (LAG Ujscie Baryczy, Poland) shared information on the LAG’s 'citizen crisis resilience network'.
A key success factor identified was the LAG’s knowledge of local stakeholders’ needs, the trust in the LAG as a cooperation partner, and its connections and cooperation with relevant local and regional authorities. Both initiatives included the preparation of guidance to improve the crisis preparedness of the local communities, which in the Polish case was complemented by a regional outreach resulting from the cooperation of LAGs. Both these documents are available in the Resources section of the event page.
Migration and displacement:
- Markéta Dvořáková (LAG Brdy-Vltava, Czechia) described the activities coordinated by the Czech National LAG Network related to community support to Ukrainian refugees;
- Matthias Wagner (LAG Leipziger Muldenland, Germany) described the housing network for refugees in the Leipzig Muldenland.
The relevance of LAGs as key actors with strong knowledge of local stakeholders was highlighted; however, being able to prioritise migrants amongst all the LAGs' topics can be a challenge, as they are highly dependent on funding or external implementers. The participatory and bottom-up approach was seen as a success factor in the design and implementation of the projects, with securing long-term funding an essential element of the sustainability of the initiatives.
Disinformation and media literacy:
- Catherine Lane (SECAD – Local Development Companies Network, Ireland) presented the Community Connection project;
- Martina Chapman (EDMO) described the #BeElectionSmart initiative - an EU-wide pre-election campaign - coordinated by EDMO.
Participants concluded that disinformation arises from tensions, frustrations, and grievances, and feeds off systematic inequalities and a fractured online environment. Response to it must be structured, and at the correct moment in time. Most importantly, it must use existing infrastructure, networks, and relationships, and be delivered by trusted stakeholders at the local level.
Conclusions from the discussions
Participants then took part in a simulation exercise, working on developing responses to imaginary – but realistic - crisis situations related to the three key topics of the workshop: climate change and extreme weather events, migration and displacement, and security and civil defence. Disinformation was addressed as the fourth, cross-cutting challenge linked to all the other themes.
The exercise sparked intense discussions and exchanges and generated interesting outcomes:
- Trust emerged as an essential element of both the immediate crisis response and for any medium- or long-term activities, regardless of the specific topics. Locals’ trust in the LAG may be particularly important if the LAG takes part in the coordination of the immediate response, allowing it to build bridges between the local communities and the local, regional, or national authorities. It is also key when communicating about the specific crisis situation.
- Peer-to-peer connections, mapping of skills and relevant knowledge, and seeing the opportunity in a crisis were mentioned particularly in the context of a migration challenge. Refugees may also be considered as an opportunity for the local economy, once the immediate crisis response has been achieved and basic needs have been met.
- The self-sufficiency/autonomy of rural communities was emphasised in the context of reducing dependency on external support during crises: how rural communities can act independently when needed, using local resources, skills, and networks to maintain essential services and support vulnerable residents until external assistance becomes available.
- The social capital built by the LAG is an important resource for both crisis responses and strengthening social resilience and preparedness. Trust and social capital – in terms of links with and among local stakeholders from all sectors, as well as with institutions external to the LAG territory – play a role not only in crisis response but also when addressing disinformation.
- When countering disinformation, LAGs should not invest all their resources in this activity, but rather focus on the disinformation that had the most disruptive impact locally. The involvement of experts, working with relevant authorities, and meetings with locals in their communities are important in this context.
- LAGs cannot do everything alone, but they can effectively contribute to crisis response when they focus on what they can do best: working together with other stakeholders and using their strong connections in the local communities.
- Beyond involvement in the immediate crisis response, there are various options for LAGs to contribute to strengthening crisis preparedness and social resilience. These include developing specific projects, strengthening local and regional partnerships with relevant stakeholders (e.g. local and regional authorities, NGOs, municipalities, businesses, volunteers), organising awareness-raising and capacity building, and making social resilience and preparedness one of their strategic priorities.
Participants agreed that the networks the LAG is involved in and the trust of the local communities in the LAG are the most essential elements without which crisis response, crisis preparedness, and building social resilience would not be feasible.