Good Practice - Project

Our Footprint: More than 1 000 actions to benefit biodiversity

Community-led nature restoration project in Finland helps hundreds of people and dozens of communities benefit from improved environmental quality.
  • CAP Implementation
  • - Programming period: 2014-2022
    South Karelia, Finland
    - Programming period: 2014-2022
    South Karelia, Finland

    General information

    RDP Priority
    • P6. Social inclusion and local development
    RDP Focus Area
    • 6B: Local development
    RDP Measure
    • M07: Basic services & village renewal
    Beneficiary type
    • Non-governmental organisation

    Summary

    This biodiversity-focused project in Finland’s South Karelia region successfully raised environmental awareness and inspired over 1 200 residents and summer visitors to take concrete action for nature. Through village events and expert-led nature walks, participants learned how to boost biodiversity in their own surroundings. Five municipalities established recreational nature sites, including a transformed landfill in Savitaipale, a traditional landscape in Lappeenranta and a bird-friendly marsh in Taipalsaari. Bumblebee monitoring confirmed that even short-term actions can positively impact biodiversity.

    Over 1 000 individual nature actions were completed, such as creating meadows, building birdhouses and insect hotels and removing invasive species. The project’s inclusive and practical approach, supported by its Instagram account '@meidanjalkemme', encouraged widespread participation and collaboration. It also fostered strong partnerships with municipalities and organisations, becoming a model for future environmental projects.

    Overall, the project demonstrated how community-driven, creative and well-communicated environmental efforts can lead to lasting change and recognition.

    Results

    • Five regional biodiversity sites were supported: a meadow in Luumäki, a nature and art site on a former landfill in Savitaipale, a traditional landscape in Lappeenranta, a dry sunny habitat in Lemi and a swamp paradise in Taipalsaari. Bumblebee monitoring showed remarkable results in just one year, with populations increasing significantly at the restored sites.
    • More than 1 000 people were directly engaged through events and volunteer activities, while media coverage and social media outreach reached hundreds of thousands.
    • 30 village info sessions and nature walks were organised, and over 1 000 biodiversity actions were completed, including meadow creation, birdhouse and insect hotel construction, and invasive species removal. More than 1 000 meadow seed packets were distributed, and 15 meadow sites were established or maintained.
    • Events focused on improving terrestrial and aquatic habitats.
    • A regional invasive species action achieved widespread engagement, long-term impact and new partnerships across sectors.

    Resources

    Small sign and seed packet shared with community

    Context

    Nature restoration represents an opportunity for EU funding systems, as each euro invested by the EU in land restoration can yield significant economic returns of up to EUR 38. Hence, funding from the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), including its LEADER component, can help Member States optimise the economic potential of nature restoration actions. Prospects are plentiful for LEADER groups to implement good practices in community-led rural development projects that restore nature.

    South Karelia is a forested area located in Eastern Finland on the shore of the country’s largest lake, Saimaa. Biodiversity loss and its impact on human well-being were a cause for concern among nature conservationists in South Karelia. The project was planned through extensive cooperation with residents and municipalities in the area, with residents and municipalities involved in the project activities from the planning stage onward. A survey of residents explored how their villages could be revitalised and what kind of actions people would be willing to take to protect nature. This attracted 120 responses and around 20% provided their contact details to express interest in a potential project.

    This context confirmed a need for the project. Residents wanted to improve biodiversity, but needed information and guidance, which the project offered in a practical and inspiring way. Five municipal territories were to be networked thanks to this good practice project.

    Objectives

    The main community-led development idea was for rural residents to learn to see the benefits of diverse nature, extending beyond natural values. The work done for nature in the project would also improve the area’s quality of life for local communities through a sense of community created by the various events and volunteer activities. Specific project goals centred on:

    • Raising environmental awareness among residents and summer visitors in the Lappeenranta region by highlighting the mutual benefits of biodiversity for people and nature.
    • Encouraging concrete actions to prevent biodiversity loss and improve local ecosystems.
    • Establishing a public biodiversity site and hosting a nature event in each of the five municipalities, along with 20 nature walks and village info sessions.
    • 100 biodiversity-enhancing actions by individuals and associations.

    Activities

    The project Our Footprint realised more than 1 000 actions for biodiversity. These activities were realised through the participation of local residents, which produced excellent results. They involved reaching out to people, guiding and inspiring them to take concrete action to benefit nature and to participate in implementing these actions.

    Core project action listened to residents’ needs and adapted biodiversity measures to the interests of local communities. Another important step was enabling nature action by providing inspiring tools to get started, such as grass seeds or materials for building birdhouses and insect hotels.

    Community-led actions realised 30 village information events and nature walks. During these, people came up with ideas for biodiversity actions to be realised in the area. The project organised several events across different municipalities to increase knowledge about nature and biodiversity, including an event focused on improving the living conditions of waterfowl and another specialised event on improving the living conditions of hole-nesting bird species.

    During a forest excursion, participants gained practical insight into the possibilities of continuous cultivation forestry for integrating biodiversity.

    Risks of harmful effects of net fishing on the Saimaa ringed seal and other organisms in Lake Saimaa were highlighted through the Verkko ei valitse (‘The Net Does Not Differentiate’) campaign.

    Active, inspiring and practical communication across multiple channels, mostly on Instagram (@meidanjalkemme), was a key part of the project. Residents were also encouraged to share their own nature actions on social media. Indirectly, through communication, the project reached hundreds of thousands of people (through media such as the newspapers Maaseudun Tulevaisuus and Etelä-Saimaan Sanomat, Radio Tempo and Instagram). Extremely successful cooperation took place during the communication actions.

    A biodiversity site open to everyone was created in all five municipalities in the project area to highlight the opportunities available to residents for biodiversity action. In addition, a larger nature event planned and realised by local residents took place in each municipality. All in all, more than 1 000 different nature actions, large and small, such as building birdhouses, establishing a meadow, arranging a nature event and combating invasive species, were realised during the project period.

    Main results

    • The project successfully established five biodiversity sites across the Lappeenranta region, each tailored to local conditions: a meadow in Luumäki, a nature and art site on a former landfill in Savitaipale, a traditional landscape in Lappeenranta, a dry sunny habitat in Lemi and a swamp paradise in Taipalsaari. Bumblebee monitoring showed remarkable results in just one year, with nature increasing significantly at the restored sites.
    • Large resident-driven nature events were held in each municipality, with one attracting over 700 participants. In total, 30 village info sessions and nature walks were organised, and over 1 000 biodiversity actions were completed, including meadow creation, birdhouse and insect hotel construction, and invasive species removal. More than 1 000 meadow seed packets were distributed, and 15 meadow sites were established or maintained.
    • Special events focused on improving habitats for birds and waterfowl, and a forestry-themed excursion was held. Additionally, four signs warning about the dangers of net fishing to Saimaa ringed seals were installed in collaboration with municipalities and the Finnish Association for Nature Conservation.
    • More than 1 000 people were directly engaged through events and volunteer activities, while media coverage and social media outreach reached hundreds of thousands.
    • The project’s success was recognised with a landscape action award from the rural women’s advisory organisation for southern Finland.
    • Another notable good practice outcome was the launch of a regional invasive species project, which demonstrated how community-driven, inclusive environmental action can lead to widespread engagement, long-term impact and new partnerships across sectors.

    Key lessons

    • The project significantly improved environmental awareness among local and summer residents in the Lappeenranta region, highlighting how biodiversity enhances both community well-being and the area's appeal.
    • Its hands-on, visible approach inspired individuals, associations, and municipalities to take voluntary action, resulting in new nature sites and a stronger sense of community. Residents also began using nature-based imagery, such as meadow seed mixes, in their own communications and branding.
    • Hundreds of people and dozens of communities were inspired by the practical examples to take their own actions to benefit nature, from establishing meadows to building birdhouses.
    • The concrete, visible actions created a ripple effect: people were inspired to act independently for biodiversity, both outside the project and after the project period.
    • The project implementation method proved successful and has inspired others to undertake similar activities in different parts of Finland.
    There is plenty of negative news about climate change and biodiversity loss. People are happy to go out and do something concrete to get a chance to have a positive impact on it. Henri Niiranen (project leader), Our Footprint: more than 1 000 actions to benefit biodiversity